Valuation of housing and neighbourhood attributes for city centre location: A case study in Santiago

Habitat International

Volumn 39, Issue , 2013, Pages 62-74

  Torres, Ignacia ^a   Greene, Margarita ^a   Ortúzar, J de D ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Efficient designs; Re population of urban centres; Residential choice; Stated choice experiments

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; LOCATION DECISION; NEIGHBORHOOD; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; URBAN AREA; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

CHILE; METROPOLITANA;

EID: 84870551094     PISSN: 01973975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Armstrong P.M., Garrido R.A., Ortúzar J.de D. Confidence intervals to bound the value of time. Transportation Research 2001, 37E:143-161.
2. Bierlaire M. BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. Proceedings 3rd Swiss transportation research conference 2003, Ascona, March.
3. Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W., Swait J.D., Williams M., Louviere J.J. A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 1996, 18:243-253.
4. Bradley M.A., Daly A.J. Estimation of logit choice models using mixed stated preference and revealed preference information. Understanding travel behaviour in an era of change 1997, Pergamon, Oxford. P.R. Stopher, M. Lee-Gosselin (Eds.).
5. Carrión F. Centros Históricos de América Latina y El Caribe 2001, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Quito, (in Spanish).
6. Caussade S., Ortúzar J.de D., Rizzi L.I., Hensher D.A. Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates. Transportation Research 2005, 39B:621-640.
7. Cherchi E., Ortúzar J.de D. Empirical identification in the mixed logit model: analysing the effect of data richness. Networks and Spatial Economics 2008, 8:109-124.
8. Espino R., Ortúzar J.de D., Román C. Confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures in mode choice models. Networks and Spatial Economics 2006, 6:81-96.
9. Foster V., Mourato S. Testing for consistency in contingent ranking experiments. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2002, 44:309-328.
10. Goett A., Hudson K., Train K. Costumer choice among retail energy suppliers: the willingness-to-pay for service attributes. Energy Journal 2000, 21:1-84.
11. Greene M., Mora R., Berríos E., Alvarez L. Estamos poblando el centro? Un análisis del subsidio de renovación urbana 2011, Working Paper, School of Architecture, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, (in Spanish).
12. Greene M., Ortúzar J.de D. Willingness to pay for social housing attributes: a case study from Chile. International Planning Studies 2002, 7:55-87.
13. Hanley N., Wright R.E., Adamowicz W. Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics 1998, 11:413-428.
14. Henry G.T. Practical sampling 1990, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
15. Hensher D. The sensitivity of the valuation of travel time savings to the specification of unobserved effects. Transportation Research 2001, 37E:129-142.
16. Hensher D., Shore N., Train K. Households' willingness to pay for water service attributes. Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, 32:509-531.
17. Iglesias P., Greene M., Ortúzar J.de D. On the perception of safety in low income neighbourhoods: using digital images in a stated choice experiment. Choice modelling: The state of the art and the state of practice 2012, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham. S. Hess, A.J. Daly (Eds.).
18. INE Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda 2002, Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas, Santiago, Chile, (in Spanish).
19. Jara-Díaz S.R. Transport economic theory 2007, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
20. McFadden D. The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics 1974, 3:303-328.
21. Munizaga M., Correia R., Jara-Díaz S.R., Ortúzar J.de D. Valuing time with a joint mode choice-activity model. International Journal of TransportEconomics 2006, 33:69-86.
22. Newman O. Creating defensible space 1996, Center for Urban Policy Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, D.C.
23. Ortúzar J.de D., Martínez F.J., Varela F.J. Stated preferences in modelling accessibility. International Planning Studies 2000, 5:65-85.
24. Ortúzar J.de D., Rodriguez G. Valuing reductions in environmental pollution in a residential location context. Transportation Research 2002, 7D:407-427.
25. Ortúzar J.de D., Willumsen L.G. Modelling transport 2011, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. 4th ed.
26. Revelt D., Train K. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choice of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics 1998, 80:647-657.
27. Rojas E. Old cities, new assets: Preserving Latin America's urban heritage 1999, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C.
28. Rojas E. Volver al Centro: La Recuperación de Areas Urbanas Centrales 2004, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C., (in Spanish).
29. Rose J.M., Bliemer M.C.J. Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs. Transport Reviews 2009, 29:587-617.
30. Sandor Z., Wedel M. Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers' prior beliefs. Journal of Marketing Research 2001, 38:430-444.
31. Sillano M., Ortúzar J.de D. Willingness-to-pay estimation with mixed logit models: some new evidence. Environment and Planning 2005, 37A:525-550.
32. Train K. Discrete choice methods with simulation 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed.
33. Train K., Revelt D., Ruud P. Mixed logit estimation routine for panel data 1999, GAUSS Code, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
34. Walker J.L. Mixed logit (or logit kernel) model: dispelling misconceptions of identification. Transportation Research Record 2002, 1805:86-98.