Stated preferences in modelling accessibility

International Planning Studies

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 65-85

  Ortuzar J D D ^a   Martinez F J ^b   Varela, F J ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; PLANNING METHOD; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 0034025469     PISSN: 13563475     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135634700111828     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anas, A. (1982) Residential Location Markets and Urban Transportation (London: Academic Press.)
2. Anas, A. (1995) Capitalisation of urban travel improvements into residential and commercial real estate: simulations with a unified model of housing, travel and shopping choices, Journal of Regional Science 35, pp.351-375.
3. Ben-Akiva, M. & Lerman, S.R. (1979) Disaggregate travel and mobility-choice models and measures of accessibility, in: D.A. Hensher & P.R. Stopher (Eds) Behavioural Travel Modelling (London: Croom Helm).
4. Bradley, M.A. & Daly, A.J. (1997) Estimation of logit choice models using mixed stated-preference and revealed-preference information, in: P. Stopher & M. Lee-Gosselin (Eds) Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change (Oxford: Pergamon)
5. Cirillo, C., Daly, A.J. & Lindveld, K. (1996) Eliminating bias due to the repeated measurements problem in SP data, Proceedings 24th European Transport Forum, Brunel University, London.
6. Cropper, M.L., Leland, D. Kishor, N. & McConnell, K.E. (1993) Valuing product attributes using single market data: a comparison of hedonic and discrete choice approaches, The Review of Economic and Statistics, 75, pp. 225-232.
7. Dalvi, M.Q. & Martin, K.M. (1976) The measurement of accessibility: some preliminary results, Transportation, 5, pp. 17-42.
8. Daly, A.J. (1992) A Logit 3.2 User's Guide (The Hague: Hague Consulting Group).
9. Domencich, T. & McFadden, D. (1975) Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioural Analysis. (Amsterdam: North Holland).
10. Epple, D. (1987) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: estimating demand and supply functions for differentiated products, Journal of Political Economy, 95, pp. 59-80.
11. ESTRAUS (1989) Estudio Estratégico de Transporte del Gran Santiago. Final Report to the Executive Secretariat of the Urban Transport Commission (SECTU), Consortium SIGDO-KOPPER/CIS, Santiago [in Spanish].
12. Fowkes, A.S. & Wardman, M. (1988) The design of stated preference travel choice experiments, with special reference to interpersonal taste variations, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, XXII, pp. 27-44.
13. Gaudry, M.J.I, Jara-Díaz, S.R., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (1989) Value of time sensitivity to model specification, Transportation Research, 23B, pp. 151-158.
14. Greene, M., Iacobelli, A. & Ortúzar, J. de D. (1995) Subjective valuation of social housing attributes, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, University of Melbourne.
15. Hansen, W.G. (1959) How accessibility shapes land use, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, pp. 73-79.
16. Hanson, S. & Schwab, M. (1987) Accessibility and intraurban travel, Environment and Planning, 19, pp. 735-748.
17. Hunt, J.D., McMillan, J.D.P. & Abraham, J.E. (1996) Stated preference investigation of influences on attractiveness of residential locations, Transportation Research Record, 1466, pp. 17-35.
18. Jara-Díaz, S.R., Martínez, F.J. & Zurita, I. (1994) A microeconomic framework to understand residential location, Proceedings 22nd European Transport Forum, University of Warwick.
19. Jones, S.R. (1981) Accessibility Measures: A Literature Review. TRRL Report LR 967 (Crowthorne, England: Transport and Road Research Laboratory).
20. Kocur, G.T., Adler, T., Hyman, W. & Aunet, B. (1982) Guide to Forecasting Travel Demand with Direct Utility Assessment. Report No: UMTA-NH-11-0001-82, Urban Mass Transportation Administration (Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation).
21. Koenig, J.G. (1980) Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application, Transportation, 9, pp. 145-172.
22. Lerman, S.R. (1977) Location, housing, automobile ownership, and mode to work: a joint choice model, Transportation Research Record, 610, pp. 6-11.
23. Louviere, J.J. (1988) An experimental design approach to the development of conjoint-based choice simulation systems with an application to forecasting future retirement migration decisions, in: R.G. College & H. Timmermans (Eds) Behavioural Modelling in Geography and Planning (London: Croom Helm).
24. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A. & Swait, J. (in press) Stated Choice Methods and Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
25. Mackiewicz, A. & Ratajczak, W. (1996) Towards a new definition of topological accessibility, Transportation Research, 30B, pp. 47-79.
26. Martínez, F.J. (1992a) The BID-CHOICE land-use model: an integrated economic framework, Environment and Planning, 24A, pp. 871-885.
27. Martínez, F.J. (1992b) Towards the 5-stages land use-transport model, Selected Proceedings of the Sixth World Conference on Transportation Research, Lyon.
28. Martínez, F.J. (1995) Access: the transport-land use economic link, Transportation Research, 29B, pp. 457-470.
29. Martínez, F.J. & Donoso, P. (1995a) MUSSA model I: the theoretical framework, Proceedings of the Seventh World Conference on Transportation Research, Sydney.
30. Martínez, F.J. & Donoso, P. (1995b) MUSSA model II: the operational model, Proceedings of the Seventh World Conference on Transportation Research, Sydney.
31. McFadden, D. (1978) Modelling the choice of residential location, in: A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars & J.W. Weibull (Eds) Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
32. Miyamoto, K. & Kitazume, K. (1989) A land-use model based on random utility/rent-bidding analysis (RURBAN), Selected Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Transport Research, Yokohama.
33. Morris, J.M., Dumble, P.L. & Wigan, M.R. (1979) Accessibility indicators for transport planning, Transportation Research, 13, pp. 91-109.
34. Neuburger, H. (1971) User benefits in the evaluation of transport and land use plans, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, V, pp. 1-10.
35. Ortúzar, J. de D. (1994) Valor del Tiempo para Evaluatión de Proyectos. Executive Report to the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development, Department of Transport Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago [in Spanish].
36. Ortúzar, J. de D. (1996) Modelling route and multimodal choices with revealed and stated preference data, Proceedings 24th European Transport Forum, Brunel University, London.
37. Ortúzar, J. de D. & Garrido, R.A. (1994) A practical assessment of stated preference methods, Transportation, 21, pp. 289-305.
38. Ortúzar, J. de D., Ivelic, A.M., Malbrán, H. & Thomas, A. (1993) The 1991 Great Santiago origin-destination survey: methodological design and main results, Traffic Engineering and Control, 34, pp. 362-368.
39. Ortúzar, J. de D., Roncagliolo, D.A. & Velarde, U.C. (1997) Interactions and independence in stated preference modelling, Proceedings 25th European Transport Forum, Brunel University, London.
40. Ortúzar, J. de D. & Willumsen, L.G. (1994) Modelling Transport, 2nd Edn (Chichester: John Wiley).
41. Pearmain, D., Swanson, J., Kroes, E. & Bradley, M. (1991) Stated Preference Techniques: A Guide to Practice (London: Steer Davies Gleave and Hague Consulting Group).
42. Pooler, J.A. (1995) The use of spatial separation in the measurement of transportation accessibility, Transportation Research, 29A, pp. 421-427.
43. Rosen, S. (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition, Journal of Political Economy, 82, pp. 34-55.
44. Varela, F.J. (1997) Preferencias Declaradas en la Modelación de la Variable Accesibilidad, M.Sc. thesis, Department of Transport Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago [in Spanish].
45. Williams, H.C.W.L. (1976) Travel demand models, duality relations and user benefit analysis, Journal of Regional Science, 16, pp. 147-166.
46. Williams, H.C.W.L. (1977) On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit, Environment and Planning, 9A, pp. 285-344.
47. Williams, H.C.W.L. & Senior, M.L. (1978) Accessibility, spatial interaction and evaluation of land use transportation plans, in: A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars & J.W. Weibull (Eds) Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (Amsterdam: North Holland).
48. Wilson, A.G. (1967) A statistical theory of spatial distribution models, Transportation Research, 1, pp. 253-269.