Evaluation of an integrated graphical display to promote acute change detection in ICU patients

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 81, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 842-851

  Anders, Shilo ^a,b   Albert, Robert ^g   Miller, Anne ^a,b,c   Weinger, Matthew B ^a,b,f   Doig, Alexa K ^e   Behrens, Michael ^d   Agutter, Jim ^d,g  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^f VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g Medvis   (United States)

Author keywords

Human engineering; Intensive care; Man machine systems; Medical informatics

Indexed keywords

CHANGE DETECTION; DISPLAY DESIGNS; ELECTRONIC CHARTS; FULL DIVERSITY; GRAPHICAL DISPLAYS; GRAPHICAL INFORMATION; INFORMATION DISPLAY; INTENSIVE CARE; LOCAL INFLUENCE; MAIN EFFECT; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NASA-TLX; PATIENT INFORMATION; REPEATED MEASURES; USER CENTERED DESIGNS; WORK PRACTICES;

DESIGN; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; NASA; NURSING;

INFORMATION USE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISPLAY SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTEGRATED GRAPHICAL INFORMATION DISPLAY; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; NURSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATOR; TABULAR PATIENT INFORMATION DISPLAY; WORK EXPERIENCE; WORKLOAD;

ADULT; DATA DISPLAY; FEMALE; HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MEDICAL ERRORS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84870527263     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Christensen C., Grossman J., Hwang J. The Innovator's Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Health Care 2009, McGraw-Hill, New York.
2. Effken J., Loeb R., Kang Y., Lin Z. Clinical information displays to improve ICU outcomes. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77:765-777.
3. Ash J., Berg M., Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004, 11(2):104-112.
4. Miller A., Scheinkestel C., Steele C. The effects of information presentation on physicians' and nurses' decision-making in ICUs. Appl. Ergon. 2009, 40(4):753-761.
5. Agutter J., Drews F., Syroid N., Westenskow D., Albert R., Strayer D., et al. Evaluation of a graphic cardiovascular display in a high fidelity simulator. Anesth. Analg. 2003, 97:1403-1413.
6. Albert R., Agutter J., Syroid N., Johnson K., Loeb R., Westenskow D. Simulation based evaluation of a graphic cardiovascular display. Anesth. Analg. 2007, 105:1303-1311.
7. Syroid N.D., Agutter J., Drews F.A., Westenskow D.R., Albert R.W., Bermudez J.C., et al. Development and evaluation of a graphical anesthesia drug display. Anesthesiology 2002, 96(3):565-575.
8. Wachter S.B., Agutter J., Syroid N., Drews F., Weinger M.B., Westenskow D. The employment of an iterative design process to develop a pulmonary graphical display. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003, 10:363-372.
9. Blike G., Surgenor S., Whalen K. A graphical object display improves anesthesiologists performance on a simulated diagnostic task. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 1999, 15:37-44.
10. Sanderson P., Watson M., Russell W. Advanced patient monitoring displays: tools for continuous informing. Anesth. Analg. 2005, 101:161-168.
11. Hackos J., Redish J. User and Task Analysis for Interface Design 1998, Wiley, New York.
12. Rubin J. Handbook of Usability Testing 1994, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
13. Clayton M. Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educ. Psychol. 1997, 17(4):373-386.
14. Scavone B., Sproviero M., McCarthy R., Wong C., Sullivan J., Siddall V., et al. Development of an objective scoring system for measurement of resident performance on the human patient simulator. Anesth 2006, 105:260-266.
15. Clason D., Dormody T. Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. J. Agric. Educ. 1994, 35(4):31-35.
16. Hart S.G., Staveland L.E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Human Mental Workload 1988, 139-183. Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland. P.A. Hancock, N. Meshkati (Eds.).
17. Charabati S., Bracco D., Mathieu P., Hemmerling T. Comparison of four different display designs of a novel anaesthetic monitorning system, the Integrated Monitor of Anaesthesia (IMA). Br. J. Anaesth. 2009, 103(5):670-677.
18. Lewis J.R. IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 1995, 7(1):57-78.
19. Shneiderman S.B., Plaisant C. Designing the User Interface 2005, Pearson Addison Wesley, USA. 4th ed.
20. Howell D. Statistical Methods for Psychology 2001, Thomson Learning, Pacific Groove, CA. 5th ed.
21. Zhang Y., Drews F., Westenskow D., Foresti S., Agutter J., Bermudez J., et al. Effects of integrated graphical displays on situation awareness in anaesthesiology. Cogn. Technol. Work 2002, 4:82-90.
22. Gorges M., Staggers N. Evaluations of physiological monitoring displays: a systematic review. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2008, 22:45-66.