A simulation-based evaluation of a graphic cardiovascular display

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 105, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1303-1311

  Albert, Robert W ^a,d   Agutter, James A ^a,b   Syroid, Noah D ^a   Johnson, Ken B ^a   Loeb, Robert G ^c   Westenskow, Dwayne R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^d Applied Medical Visualizations   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DISPLAY SYSTEM; GRAPHICAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISPLAY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUNG ARTERY CATHETER; MEDICAL EXPERT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENT; SIMULATION; VERBALIZATION; WORKLOAD;

EID: 37349100104     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000282823.76059.ca     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Goodstein LP. Discriminative display support for process operators, human detection and diagnosis of system failure. New York: Plenum, 1981
2. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Long CD. Human error in anesthesia management. In: Gravenstein JS, Grundy BL, ed. The quality of care in anesthesia. Springfield, IL: Thomas Books, 1980:114-30
3. Vicente KJ, Christoffersen K, Pereklita A. Supporting operator problem solving through ecological interface design. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1995;25:529-45
4. Agutter J, Drews F, Syroid N, Westneskow D, Albert R, Strayer D, Bermudez J, Weinger MB. Evaluation of graphic cardiovascular display in a high-fidelity simulator. Anesth Analg 2003;97:1403-13
5. Drews FA, Westenskow DR. The right picture is worth a thousand numbers: data displays in anesthesia. Hum Factors 2006;48:59-71
6. Albert RW, Syroid ND, Zhang Y, Agutter J, Drews F, Strayer D, Hutchinson G, Westenskow D. Psychophysical scaling of a cardiovascular information display. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. Seattle, WA: IEEE, 2003:35-42
7. Travis D. Applying visual psychophysics to user interface design. Behav Inf Technol 1990;9:425-38
8. Triesman A. Preattentive processing in vision. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 1980;31:156-77
9. Wang Q, Cavanagh P, Green M. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Percept Psychophys 1994;56:495-500
10. Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research, human mental workload. Amsterdam, North-Holland: Elsevier Science, 1988
11. Marascuilo LA, McSweeney M. Nonparametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1977
12. Blike GT, Surgenor SD, Whalen K. A graphical object display improves anesthesiologists' performance on a simulated diagnostic task. J Clin Monit Comput 1999;15:37-44
13. Wachter SB, Agutter J, Syroid N, Drews F, Weinger MB, Westenskow D. The employment of an iterative design process to develop a pulmonary graphical display. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:363-72
14. Wachter SB, Johnson K, Albert R, Syroid N, Drews F, Westenskow D. The evaluation of a pulmonary display to detect adverse respiratory events using high resolution human simulator. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:635-42
15. Drews FA, Syroid N, Agutter J, Strayer DL, Westenskow DR. Drug delivery as control task: improving performance in a common anesthetic task. Hum Factors 2006;48:85-94
16. Syroid ND, Agutter J, Drews FA, Westenskow DR, Albert RW, Bermudez JC, Strayer DL, Prenzel H, Loeb RG, Weinger MB. Development and evaluation of a graphical anesthesia drug display. Anesthesiology 2002;96:565-75
17. Clayton MJ. Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educ Psychol 1997;17:373-86
18. Forrest FC, Taylor MA, Postlethwaite K, Aspinall R. Use of a high-fidelity simulator to develop testing of the technical performance of novice anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:338-44
19. Scavone BM, Sproviero MT, McCarthy RJ, Wong CA, Sullivan JT, Siddall VJ, Wade LD. Development of an objective scoring system for measurement of resident performance on the human patient simulator. Anesthesiology 2006;105:260-6
20. 2 rebreathing cardiac output and continuous thermodilution cardiac output in patients undergoing aortic reconstruction surgery. Anesthesiology 2003;99:283-8
21. 2 rebreathing. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004;18:563-72
22. 2 rebreathing indirect Fick technique for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output. J Clin Monit Comput 2000;16:361-74
23. 2 rebreathing cardiac output - operating principles of the NICO system. J Clin Monit Comput 1999;15:387-401
24. Mielck F, Buhre W, Hanekop G, Tirilomis T, Hilgers R, Sonntag H. Comparison of continuous cardiac output measurements in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003;17:211-16
25. 2 rebreathing after severe chest trauma. J Trauma 2001;51:849-53
26. Tachibana K, Imanaka H, Takeuchi M, Takauchi Y, Miyano H, Nishimura M. Noninvasive cardiac output measurement using partial carbon dioxide rebreathing is less accurate at settings of reduced minute ventilation and when spontaneous breathing is present. Anesthesiology 2003;98:830-7
27. Hotchkiss MA, Biddle C, Fallacaro M. Assessing the authenticity of the human simulation experience in anesthesiology. AANA J 2002;70:470-3