A graphical objegt display improves anesthesiologists' performance on a simulated diagnostic task

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 37-44

  Blike, George T ^a   Surgenor, Stephen D ^a   Whalen, Kate ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Anesthesia safety; Critical events; Graphic data display; Human factors; Integrated display; Object display; Patient monitoring

Indexed keywords

ANAPHYLAXIS; ANESTHESIST; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DISPLAY SYSTEM; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOVOLEMIA; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LUNG EMBOLISM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MONITOR; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHOCK; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; ANESTHESIOLOGY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HEART SURGERY;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER MONITORS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MEASUREMENT ERRORS; PATIENT MONITORING;

GRAPHICAL OBJECT DISPLAY; SHOCK ETIOLOGY; TOUCH SCREEN MONITOR;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DATA DISPLAY; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; SHOCK; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0032590256     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009914019889     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Runciman W, Sellen A et al. Errors, incidents and accidents in anaesthesia. Anaesth Int Care 1993; 21 (5): 506-519
2. Pierce E. Reducing preventable anesthetic mishaps: A need for greater risk management initiatives. ASA Newsletter 1985
3. Emergency Care Research Institute. Deaths during general anesthesia. J Health Care Technol 1985; 1: 155-175
4. Gaba D, Maxwell M, DeAnda A. Anesthetic mishaps -breaking the chain of accident evolution. Anesthesiology 1987; 66: 670-676
5. Nagel DC. Human error in aviation operations. In: Wiener EL, Nagel DC, eds. Human factors in aviation. New York: Academic Press 1988
6. Williamson AM, Feyer A. Behavioural epidemiology as a tool for accident research. J Occup Accid 1990; 12: 207-222
7. Webb RK, Currie M, Morgan C et al. The Australian incident monitoring study: An analysis of 2000 reports. Anaesth Int Care 1993; 21: 520-528
8. Forrest J, Cahalan M et al. Multicenter study of general anesthesia. II. Results. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 262-268
9. Gaba D. Human error in dynamic medical domains. Hum Error Med 1994: 197-224
10. Cook R, Potter S, Woods D et al. Evaluating the human engineering of microprocessor controlled operating room devices. J Clin Monit 1991; 7: 217-226
11. Cook R, Woods D. Operating at the sharp end. Hum Error Med 1994; 13: 255-310
12. Zinser K, Frischenschlager F. Multimedial push into power. IEEE Spectrum 1994: 44-48
13. Vicente KJ, Moray N, Lee JD, Rasmussen J et al. Evaluation of a rankine cycle display for nuclear power plant monitoring and diagnosis. Hum Factors 1996; 38 (3): 506-521
14. Weinger M, Smith N. Vigilance, alarms, and integrated monitoring systems: Anesthesia equipment. In Ehrenwerth J, ed. New York: Moseby 1993: 371-379
15. Siegle J, Farrell E, Goldwyn R et al. The surgical implications of physiologic patterns in myocardial infarction shock. Anesthesiology 1991; 72: 126-141
16. Weinger M, Gurushanthaiah K et al. Visual display format affects the ability of anesthesiologists to detect acute physiologic changes. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 1184-1193
17. Gaba D. Crisis management in anesthesiology. New York: Churchill Livingstone 1994
18. Westenskow D. An integrated graphic display improves detection and identification of critical events during anesthesia. J Clin Monit 1997; 13: 249-259
19. Cook R. Adapting to new technology in the operating room. Human Factors 1996; 38 (4): 593-613
20. Hancock P, Flach J et al. Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1995
21. Rasmussen J, Vicente KJ et al. Evaluation of a rankine cycle display for nuclear power plant monitoring and diagnosis. Human Factors 1996; 38 (3): 506-521