Evaluation of Graphic Cardiovascular Display in a High-Fidelity Simulator

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1403-1413

  Agutter, James ^a   Drews, Frank ^a   Syroid, Noah ^b   Westneskow, Dwayne ^b   Albert, Rob ^a   Strayer, David ^a   Bermudez, Julio ^a   Weinger, Matthew B ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c University of California San Diego   (United States)

^d VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAPHYLAXIS; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIST; ARTERIAL OXYGEN SATURATION; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION REACTION; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; DEVICE; DISPLAY SYSTEM; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEMODYNAMICS; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY; SIMULATOR; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0142212377     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000085298.03143.CD     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Runciman WB, Sellen A, Webb RK, et al. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study: errors, incidents and accidents in anaesthetic practice. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993;21:506-19.
2. Gaba DM, Maxwell M, DeAnda A. Anesthetic mishaps: breaking the chain of accident evolution. Anesthesiology 1987;66: 670-6.
3. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Long CD. Human error in anesthesia management: the quality of care in anesthesia. Springfield, IL: Thomas Books, 1980.
4. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Long CD, McPeek B. Preventable anesthesia mishaps: a study of human factors. Anesthesiology 1978;49:399-406.
5. Reason J. The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1990;327:475-84.
6. Goodstein LP. Discriminative display support for process operators: human detection and diagnosis of system failure. New York: Plenum, 1981.
7. Boff KR, Lincoln JE. Engineering Data Compendium: human perception and performance. Dayton, OH: Harry G. Armstrong Medical Research Laboratory, 1988.
8. Vicente KJ, Christoffersen K, Pereklita A. Supporting operator problem solving through ecological interface design. IEEE Trans Syst Mass Cybernet 1995;25:529-45.
9. Jungk A, Thull B, Hoeft A, Rau G. Evaluation of two new ecological interface approaches for the anesthesia workplace. J Clin Monit Comput 2000;16:243-58.
10. Jungk A, Thull B, Hoeft A, Rau G. Ergonomic evaluation of an ecological interface and a profilogram display for hemodynamic monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput 1999;15:469-79.
11. Effken JA, Kim NG, Shaw RE. Making the constraints visible: testing the ecological approach to interface design. Ergonomics 1997;40:1-27.
12. Vicente KJ. Ecological interface design: progress and challenges. Hum Factors 2002;44:62-78.
13. Ware C. Information visualization: perception for design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
14. Roscoe SN. Airborne displays for flight and navigation. Hum Factors 1968;10:321-32.
15. Gurushanthaiah K, Weinger MB, Englund CE. Visual display format affects the ability of anesthesiologists to detect acute physiologic changes: a laboratory study employing a clinical display simulator. Anesthesiology 1995;83:1184-93.
16. Triesman A. Preattentive processing in vision. Comput Vis Graphics Image Proc 1985;31:156-77.
17. Agutter J, Syroid ND, Drews FA, et al. Case study: graphic data display for cardiovascular system. IEEE Symp Inform Vis 2001: 163-8.
18. Wachter SB, Agutter J, Syroid N, et al. The employment of an iterative design process to develop a pulmonary graphical display. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:363-72.
19. Sharp T, Helmicki A. The application of the ecological interface design approach to neonatal intensive care medicine. Santa Monica, CA: HFES, 1998:350-4.