Enhancing learning through technology at the Kent State University College of Podiatric Medicine

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 491-498

  DiBacco, Priscilla M ^a   Hetherington, Vincent J ^b   Putman, David ^b  

^a MERCYHURST COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PODIATRY; REVIEW; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FACULTY; HUMANS; OHIO; PODIATRY; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84870514156     PISSN: 87507315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7547/1020491     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. MCCLURE A: Lecture capture: a fresh look. University Business Web site. April 2008. Available at: http://www.universitybusiness.com/viewarticle.aspx?articleid1/41043&p1/41. Accessed September 12, 2012.
2. KOLOWICH S: Fans and fears of "lecture capture." Inside Higher Education Web site. November 9, 2009. Available at: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/11/09/capture. Accessed September 12, 2012.
3. VON KONSKY BR, IVINS J, GRIBBLE SJ: Lecture attendance and web based lecture technologies: a comparison of student perceptions and usage patterns. Australasian J Educ Tech 25: 581, 2009.
4. MEDIASITE BY SONIC FOUNDRY. Available at: http://www.sonicfoundry.com. Accessed September, 12 2012.
5. CHARLTON BG: Lectures are an effective teaching method because they exploit human evolved "human nature" to improve learning. 2009. Available at: http://www.hedweb.com/bgcharlton/ed-lect.html. Accessed November 7, 2012.
6. MASSINGHAM P, HERRINGTON T: Does attendance matter? An examination of student attitudes, participation, performance and attendance. J Univ Teach Learn Pract 3: 3, 2006.
7. THE CRIMSON STAFF: Harvard should use new technology to make more course multimedia available online. The Harvard Crimson, February 14, 2006. Available at: http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref1/4511262. Accessed February 2006.
8. EDUCAUSE LEARNING INITIATIVE/ELI: DukeCapture: automated classroom lecture recording. May 2006. Available at: http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI5011.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2012.
9. DAVIS SJ, CONNELLY A, LINFIELD E: Lecture capture: making the most of face-to-face learning. Engineer Educ 4: 4, 2009.
10. ARULAMPALAM W, NAYLOR RA, SMITH J: Am I missing something? the effects of absence from class on student performance. November 2007. Available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/workingpapers/publications/twerp_820.pdf. Accessed November 2007.
11. BERTSCH TF, CALLAS PW, RUBIN A, et al: Effectiveness of lectures attended via interactive video conferencing versus in-person in preparing third-year internal medicine clerkship students for Clinical Practice Examinations (CPX). Teach Learn Med 19: 4, 2007.
12. Billings-Gagliardi S, Mazor KM: Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter? Acad Med 82 (suppl): S73, 2007.
13. CARDALL S, KRUPAT E, ULRICH M: Live lecture versus videorecorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Acad Med 83: 1174, 2008.
14. DAVIS J, CRABB S, ROGERS E, et al: Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomized controlled trial. Med Teach 30: 302, 2008.