Towards a cognitive-based approach to distributed requirement elicitation processes

WER 2005 - 8th Workshop on Requirements Engineering, Workshop em Engenharia de Requisitos

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 75-86

  Aranda, Gabriela N ^a   Vizcaíno, Aurora ^b   Cechich, Alejandra ^a   Piattini, Mario ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL COMAHUE   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY; COGNITIVE STYLES; COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL; ELICITATION TECHNIQUES; GLOBAL SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; REQUIREMENT ELICITATION; REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION;

REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 84870464979     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Aranda, G., Cechich, A., Vizcaíno, A., and Castro-Schez, J.J. Using fuzzy sets to analyse personal preferences on groupware tools. In X Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación, CACIC 2004. San Justo, Argentina, October (2004) 549-560.
2. Aranda, G., Vizcaíno, A., Cechich, A., and Piattini, M. A Cognitive Perspective for Choosing Groupware Tools and Elicitation Techniques in Virtual Teams. In International Conference on Computational Science and its Applications (ICCSA 2005). Singapore: © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, May (2005) 1064-1074. (Pubitemid 41313923)
3. Aranda, G., Vizcaíno, A., Cechich, A., and Piattini, M. A Cognitive-Based Approach to Improve Distributed Requirement Elicitation Processes. Accepted in 4th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI'05). Irvine, USA, August (2005).
4. Blank, G.D., Roy, S., Sahasrabudhe, S., Pottenger, W.M., and Kessler, G.D., Adapting Multimedia for Diverse Student Learning Styles. The Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 18(3), (2003) 45-58.
5. Bostrom, R.P., Olfman, L., and Sein, M.K. The Importance of Individual Differences in End-User Training: The Case for Learning Style. In 1988 ACM SIGCPR Conference. Maryland, April (1988) 133-141.
6. Chiew, V. and Wang, Y. From Cognitive Psychology to Cognitive Informatics. In Second IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics, ICCI'03. London, UK, August (2003) 114-120.
7. Damian, D. and Zowghi, D. The impact of stakeholders geographical distribution on managing requirements in a multi-site organization. In IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering, RE'02. Essen, Germany, September (2002) 319-328.
8. Davis, A., Software Requirements: Objects, Functions and States. Upper Saddle River. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, (1993).
9. Felder, R. and Silverman, L., Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education, 78(7), (1988) 674-681.
10. Goetz, R. and Rupp, C. Psychotherapy for System Requirements. In Second IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI'03). London, England, August (2003) 75-80.
11. Hickey, A.M. and Davis, A. Requirements Elicitation and Elicitation Technique Selection: A Model for Two Knowledge-Intensive Software Development Processes. In 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS), January (2003) 96-105.
12. Hickey, A.M. and Davis, A.M. Elicitation Technique Selection: How do experts do it? In International Joint Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE03). Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press, September (2003) 169- 178.
13. Lloyd, W., Rosson, M.B., and Arthur, J. Effectiveness of Elicitation Techniques in Distributed Requirements Engineering. In 10th Anniversary IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering, RE'02. Essen, Germany, September (2002) 311-318.
14. Loucopoulos, P. and Karakostas, V., System Requirements Engineering. International series in Software Engineering, Mc Graw-Hill. New York, NY, USA, (1995).
15. Martín, A., Martinez, C., Martinez, N., Aranda, G., and Cechich, A. Classifying Groupware Tools to Improve Communication in Geographically Distributed Elicitation. In IX Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación, CACIC 2003. La Plata, Argentina, October (2003) 942-953.
16. Miller, J. and Yin, Z., A Cognitive-Based Mechanism for Constructing Software Inspection Teams. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30(11), (2004) 811-825. (Pubitemid 40055831)
17. Moallem, M. The Implications of Research Literature on Learning Styles for the Design and Development of a Web-Based Course. In International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2002. Auckland, New Zealand, December (2002) 71-74.
18. SWEBOK, Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge, Software Engineering Coordinating Committee IEEE Computer Society, (2004).
19. Thomas, L., Ratcliffe, M., Woodbury, J., and Jarman, E. Learning styles and performance in the introductory programming sequence. In 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Cincinnati, Kentucky, USA, February (2002) 33-37. (Pubitemid 34991344)
20. Wang, Y. On Cognitive Informatics. In First IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics, ICCI'02. Calgary, Alberta, Canada, August (2002) 34-42.
21. Wu, C.C., Dale, N.B., and Bethel, L.J. Conceptual Models and Cognitive Learning Styles in Teaching Recursion. In Twenty-ninth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Atlanta, Georgia, United States, February (1998) 292 - 296. (Pubitemid 128574585)