Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cellulose nanofibers

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 7, Issue , 2012, Pages 3555-3565

  de Lima, Renata ^a   Feitosa, Leandro Oliveira ^a   Maruyama, Cintia Rodrigues ^a   Barga, Mariana Abreu ^a   Yamawaki, Patrícia Cristina ^a   Vieira, Isolda Jesus ^a   Teixeira, Eliangela M ^b   Corrêa, Ana Carolina ^b   Caparelli Mattoso, Luiz Henrique ^b   Fraceto, Leonardo Fernandes ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOROCABA   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^c SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cotton; Curaua; Environmental nanotechnology; Nanotoxicology

Indexed keywords

BROWN COTTON NANOFIBER; CELLULOSE NANOFIBER; CURAUA NANOFIBER; GREEN COTTON NANOFIBER; NANOFIBER; RUBY COTTON NANOFIBER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WHITE COTTON NANOFIBER;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; COMET ASSAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COTTON; CYTOTOXICITY TEST; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FIBER LENGTH; FIBROBLAST CULTURE; GENOTOXICITY; LYMPHOCYTE CULTURE; MOUSE; NANOTOXICOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ONION; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRODUCT SAFETY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

3T3 CELLS; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; CELLULOSE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; COMET ASSAY; COTTON FIBER; DNA DAMAGE; HUMANS; LEUKOCYTES, MONONUCLEAR; MICE; MITOTIC INDEX; MUTAGENICITY TESTS; NANOFIBERS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; ONIONS; SEEDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ALLIUM CEPA; ANIMALIA; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 84870362129     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S30596     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. de Souza Lima MM, Borsali R. Rodlike cellulose microcrystals: structure, properties, and applications. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2004;25(7):771-787.
2. Eichhorn SJ, Baillie CA, Zafeiropoulos N, etal. Review: Current international research into cellulosic fibres and composites. J Mater Sci. 2001;36(9):2107-2131.
3. Teixeira EM, Lotti C, Corrêa AC, Teodoro KB, Marconcini JM, Mattoso LH. Thermoplastic corn starch reinforced with cotton cellulose nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011;120(4):2428-2433.
4. Chau CF, Wu SH, Yen GC. The development of regulations for food nanotechnology. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2007;18(5):269-280.
5. Bouwmeester H, Dekkers S, Noordam MY, etal. Review of health safety aspects of nanotechnologies in food production. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009;53(1):52-62.
6. Nafee N, Schneider M, Schaefer UF, Lehr CM. Relevance of the colloidal stability of chitosan/PLGA nanoparticles on their cytotoxicity profile. Int J Pharm. 2009;381(2):130-139.
7. Herzog E, Casey A, Lyng FM, Chambers G, Byrne HJ, Davoren M. A new approach to the toxicity testing of carbon-based nanomaterials-the clonogenic assay. Toxicol Lett. 2007;174(1-3):49-60.
8. Pisanic TR 2nd, Blackwell JD, Shubayev VI, Fiňones RR, Jin S. Nanotoxicity of iron oxide nanoparticle internalization in growing neurons. Biomaterials. 2007;28(16):2572-2581.
9. Ng CT, Li JJ, Bay BH, Yung LYL. Current studies into the genotoxic effects of nanomaterials. J Nucleic Acids. 2010;2010:pii:947859.
10. Landsiedel R, Kapp MD, Schulz M, Wiench K, Oesc F. Genotoxicity investigations on nanomaterials: methods, preparation and characterization of test material, potential artifacts and limitations-many questions, some answers. Mutat Res. 2009;681(2-3):241-258.
11. Kumari M, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N. Genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in Allium cepa. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407(19): 5243-5246.
12. Panda KK, Achary VM, Krishnaveni R, etal. In vitro biosynthesis and genotoxicity bioassay of silver nanoparticles using plants. Toxicol In Vitro. 2011;25(5):1097-1105.
13. Fachinetto JM, Ourique AF, Lubini G, Tedesco SB, Silva AC, Beck RC. Tretinoin-loaded polymeric nanocapsules: evaluation of the potential to improve the antiproliferative activities on Allium cepa root-tip compared to the free drug. Latin American Journal of Pharmacy. 2008;27(5):668-673.
14. Ghosh M, Bandyopadhyay M, Mukherjee A. Genotoxicity of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles at two trophic levels: plant and human lymphocytes. Chemosphere. 2010;81(10):1253-1262.
15. De Lima R, Feitosa, L, Pereira AE, etal. Evaluation of the genotoxicity of chitosan nanoparticles for use in food packaging films. J Food Sci. 2010;75(6):89-96.
16. Klančnik K, Drobne D, Valant J, Dolenc Koce J. Use of a modified Allium test with nanoTiO2. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010;74(1): 85-92.
17. Ghodake G, Seo YD, Lee DS. Hazardous phytotoxic nature of cobalt and zinc oxide nanoparticles assessed using Allium cepa. J Hazard Mater. 2011;186(1):952-955.
18. Parida UK, Bindhani BK, Nayak P. Green synthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles using onion (Allium cepa) extract. World Journal of Nano Science and Engineering. 2011;1(4):93-98.
19. Dusinská M, Collins A, Kazimírová A, etal. Genotoxic effects of asbestos in humans. Mutat Res. 2004;553(1-2):91-102.
20. Dusinska M, Collins AR. The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene-environment interactions. Mutagenesis. 2008;23(3):191-205.
21. Collins AR, Oscoz AA, Brunborg G, etal. The comet assay: topical issues. Mutagenesis. 2008;23(3):143-151.
22. Azqueta A, Gutzkow KB, Brunborg G, Collins AR. Towards a more reliable comet assay: optimising agarose concentration, unwinding time and electrophoresis conditions. Mutat Res. 2011;724(1-2):41-45.
23. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989.
24. Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D, etal. Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2000;35(3):206-221.
25. Collins AR, Dobson VL, Dusinská M, Kennedy G, Stetina R. The comet assay: what can really tell us? Mutat Res. 1997;375(2):183-193.
26. Lovell DP, Omori T. Statistical issues in the use of the comet assay. Mutagenesis. 2008;23(3):171-182.
27. Kalia S, Dufresne A, Cherian BM, etal. Cellulose-based bio-and nanocomposites: a review. Int J Polym Sci. 2011;2011:Article ID 837875.
28. Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA, Sain M. Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review. Bio Resources. 2008;3(3):929-980.
29. Xiao YH, Zhang ZS, Yin MH, etal. Cotton flavonoid structural genes related to the pigmentation in brown fibers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;358(1):73-78.
30. Hua S, Wang X, Yuan S, etal. Characterization of pigmentation and cellulose synthesis in colored cotton fibers. Crop Sci. 2007;47(4): 1540-1546.
31. de Carvalho LP, dos Santos JW. Respostas correlacionadas do algodoeiro com a seleção para a coloração da fibra [Correlated responses to selection of cotton for dyeing fiber]. Pesq Agropec Bras. 2003;38:79-83. Portuguese.
32. Corrêa AC, Teixeira EM, Pessan LA, Mattoso LHC, Cellulose nanofibers from curaua fibers. Cellulose. 2010;17(6):1183-1192.
33. Teixeira EM, Corrêa AC, Manzoli A, Leite FL, Oliveira CR, Mattoso LH. Cellulose nanofibers from white and naturally colored cotton fibers. Cellulose. 2010;17(3):595-606.
34. Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D, etal. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater. 2009;8(7):543-557.
35. Odeigah PGC, Nurudeen O, Amund OO. Genotoxicity of oil field wastewater in Nigeria. Hereditas. 1997;126(2):161-167.
36. Antosiewicz D. Analysis of the cell cycle in root meristem of Allium cepa under the influence of ledakrin. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 1990;28(1-2):79-95.
37. Singh N, Manshian B, Jenkins GJ, etal. NanoGenotoxicology: the DNA damaging potential of engineered nanomaterials. Biomaterials. 2009; 30(23-24):3891-3914.
38. Rank J, Nielsen MH. A modified Allium test as a tool in the screening of genotoxicity of complex mixtures. Hereditas. 1993;118(1):49-53.
39. Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res. 1988;175(1):184-191.
40. Ostling O, Johanson KJ. Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984;123(1):291-298.
41. Dufresne A. Comparing the mechanical properties of high performances polymer nanocomposites from biological sources. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2006;6(2):322-330.
42. Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE. Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2(8):469-478.
43. Clift MJ, Foster EJ, Vanhecke D, etal. Investigating the interaction of cellulose nanofibers derived from cotton with a sophisticated 3D human lung cell coculture. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12(10): 3666-3673.