Systematic underestimation resulting from measurement error in score-based ecological indices

Biological Conservation

Volumn 157, Issue , 2013, Pages 266-276

  Gorrod, Emma J ^a,b   Bedward, Michael ^b   Keith, David A ^b,c   Ellis, Murray V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT AND HERITAGE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Indices; Measurement error; Scoring thresholds; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DATA PROCESSING; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; INDEX METHOD; PARAMETERIZATION; THRESHOLD; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VEGETATION TYPE; WOODLAND;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 84870316430     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Archaux F., Gosselin F., Berges L., Chevalier R. Effects of sampling time, species richness and observer on the exhaustiveness of plant censuses. J. Veg. Sci. 2006, 17:299-306.
2. Australian National Audit Office, 2007. The Auditor-General Audit Report No. 21 2007-2008. Regional Delivery Model for the Natural Heritage Trust and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. Australian National Audit Office, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, ACT.
3. Benson D. Native vegetation of the Penrith 1:100 000 map sheet. Cunninghamia 1992, 2:541-596.
4. Burgman M.A. Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York.
5. Burgman M.A., Breininger D.R., Duncan B.W., Ferson S. Setting reliability bounds on habitat suitability indices. Ecol. Appl. 2001, 11:70-78.
6. Chatfield C. Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 1995, 158:419-466.
7. Cohen J. The cost of dichotomization. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1983, 7:249-253.
8. Cohen M.J., Lane C.R., Reiss K.C., Surdick J.A., Bardi E., Brown M.T. Vegetation based classification trees for rapid assessment of isolated wetland condition. Ecol. Ind. 2005, 5:189-206.
9. De Ornellas P., Milner-Gulland E.J., Nicholson E. The impact of data realities in conservation planning. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144:1980-1988.
10. DEC, 2005. BioBanking - A Biodiversity Offsets and Banking Scheme. Conserving and Restoring Biodiversity in NSW. Working Paper. New South Wales Department of Environment and Conservation, Sydney. December 2005.
11. DEC, 2006. Reviewed interim vegetation condition benchmarks (published 8 August 2006) New South Wales Department of Environment and Conservation, Sydney. August 2006.
12. DECC, 2008a. BioBanking Assessment Methodology, July 2008. NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change, Sydney, NSW.
13. DECC, 2008b. Reviewed Interim Vegetation Condition Benchmarks, October 2008. NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change, Sydney.
14. DNR, 2007. Native Vegetation Regulation 2005 Environmental Outcomes Assessment Methodology. New South Wales Department of Natural Resources, Sydney, 22 February 2007. Originally Published 18th November 2005 and Amended 21st July 2006, 24th November 2006 and 2nd March 2007.
15. Dolph C.L., Sheshukov A.Y., Chizinski C.J., Vondracek B., Wilson B. The Index of Biological Integrity and the bootstrap: can random sampling error affect stream impairment decisions?. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 10:527-537.
16. DSE, 2004. Vegetation Quality Assessment Manual (Version 1.3), October 2004. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, East Melbourne, Victoria.
17. DSE, 2006. Bush Broker: Native Vegetation Credit Registration and Trading. Information Paper. Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.
18. DSE, 2008. BushTender: Rethinking Investment for Native Vegetation Outcomes. The Application of Auctions for Securing Private Land Management Agreements. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, East Melbourne, Victoria.
19. Fore L.S., Karr J.R., Conquest L.L. Statistical properties of an Index of Biological Integrity used to evaluate water resources. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1994, 51(5):1077-1087.
20. Gibbons, P., Ayers, D., Seddon, J., Doyle, S., Briggs, S., 2005. BioMetric, a Terrestrial Biodiversity Assessment Tool for the NSW Property Vegetation Plan Developer, Operational Manual. Version 1.8. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation, c/- CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Canberra.
21. Gibbons P., Briggs S., Ayers D., Seddon J., Doyle S., Cosier P., McElhinny C., Pelly V., Roberts K. An operational method to assess impacts of land clearing on terrestrial biodiversity. Ecol. Ind. 2009, 9:26-40.
22. Gibbons, P., Ayers, D., Seddon, J., Doyle, S., Briggs, S., 2008. BioMetric 2.0, A Terrestrial Biodiversity Assessment Tool for the NSW Native Vegetation Assessment Tool, Operational Manual, July 2008. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation, c/- CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Canberra, ACT.
23. Gibbs J.P., Droege S., Eagle P. Monitoring populations of plants and animals. Bioscience 1998, 48:935-940.
24. Gorrod, E.J., 2011. Evaluating the Ecological and Operational Basis of Vegetation Condition Assessments. PhD Thesis, University of Melbourne.
25. Gorrod E.J., Keith D.A. Observer variation in field assessments of vegetation condition: implications for biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Manage. Restor. 2009, 10:32-41.
26. Harper M.J., McCarthy M.A., van der Ree R., Fox J.C. Overcoming bias in ground-based surveys of hollow bearing trees using double sampling. For. Ecol. Manage. 2004, 190:291-300.
27. Hyatt E. Editorial. Ecol. Ind. 2001, 1:1-2.
28. Karr J. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 1981, 6:21-27.
29. Klimes L. Scale dependent variation in visual estimates of grassland plant cover. J. Veg. Sci. 2003, 14:815-821.
30. McCarthy M.A., Parris K.M., van der Ree R., McDonnell M.J., Burgman M.A., Williams N.S.G., McLean N., Harper M.J., Meyer R., Hahs A., Coates T. The habitat hectares approach to vegetation assessment: an evaluation and suggestions for improvement. Ecol. Manage. Restor. 2004, 5:24-27.
31. McGowan C.P., Runge M.C., Larson M.A. Incorporating parametric uncertainty into population viability analysis models. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144:1400-1408.
32. Milberg P., Bergstedt J., Fridman J., Odell G., Westerberg L. Observer bias and random variation in vegetation monitoring data. J. Veg. Sci. 2008, 19:633-644.
33. Moore J.L., Hauser C.E., Bear J.L., Williams S.G., McCarthy M.A. Estimating detection-effort curves for plants using search experiments. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21(2):601-607.
34. Murphy S.R., Lodge G.M. Ground cover in temperate native perennial grass pastures. I. A comparison of four estimation methods. Rangeland J. 2002, 24:288-300.
35. Niemi G.J., McDonald M.E. Application of ecological indicators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004, 35:89-111.
36. NSW Scientific Committee, 2009. Cumberland Plain Woodland in the Sydney Basin Bioregion - critically endangered ecological community listing. Final Determination. (dowlnloaded 22/9/2012). http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/determinations/cumberlandwoodlandsFD.htm.
37. Oliver I., Ede A., Hawes W., Grieve A. The NSW Environmental Services Scheme: results for the biodiversity benefits index, lessons learned and the way forward. Ecol. Manage. Restor. 2005, 6:197-205.
38. Parkes D., Newell G., Cheal D. Assessing the quality of native vegetation: The 'habitat hectares' approach. Ecological Management and Restoration 2003, 4:S29-S38.
39. Parysow P., Tazik D.J. Assessing the effect of estimation error on population viability analysis: an example using the black-capped vireo. Ecol. Model. 2002, 155:217-229.
40. Rayner L., Ellis M., Taylor J.E. Double sampling to assess the accuracy of ground-based surveys of tree hollows in eucalypt woodlands. Austral Ecol. 2011, 36(3):252-260.
41. Regan H.M., Colyvan M., Burgman M.A. A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12:618-628.
42. Ringvall A., Petersson H., Stahl G., Lamas T. Surveyor consistency in presence absence sampling for monitoring vegetation in a boreal forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 212:109-117.
43. Royston P., Altman D.G., Sauerbrei W. Dichotomising continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat. Med. 2006, 25:127-141.
44. Smith A.D. A study of the reliability of range vegetation estimates. Ecology 1944, 25:441-448.
45. Stoneham G., Chaudhri V., Ha A., Strappazzon L. Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2003, 47:477-500.
46. Sykes J.M., Horrill A.D., Mountford M.D. Use of visual cover assessments as quantitative estimators of some British woodland taxa. J. Ecol. 1983, 71:437-450.
47. Taylor B.L. The reliability of using Population Viability Analysis for risk classification of species. Conserv. Biol. 1995, 9(3):551-558.
48. ten Kate K., Inbar M. Biodiversity offsets. Conservation and Biodiversity Banking. A Guide to Setting up and Running Biodiversity Credit Trading Systems 2008, Earthscan, London. N. Carroll, J. Fox, R. Bayon (Eds.).
49. Tozer M. The native vegetation of the Cumberland Plain, western Sydney: systematic classification and field identification of communities. Cunninghamia 2003, 8:1-75.
50. US FWS, 1981. Standards for the Development of Habitat Suitability Index Models. ESM 103. Release 1-81. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
51. USDA FSA, 2006. Conservation Reserve Program Sign up 29 Environmental Benefits Index Factsheet. United States Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency, Washington, DC.
52. Van der Lee G.E.M., Van der Molen D.T., Van der Boogaard H.F.P., Van der Klis H. Uncertainty analysis of a spatial habitat suitability model and implications for ecological management of water bodies. Landscape Ecol. 2006, 21:1019-1032.
53. van Hees W.W.S., Mead B.R. Ocular estimates of understorey vegetation structure in a closed Picea glauca/Betula papyrifera forest. J. Veg. Sci. 2000, 11:195-200.
54. Vittoz P., Guisan A. How reliable is the monitoring of permanent vegetation plots? A test with multiple observers. J. Veg. Sci. 2007, 18:413-422.
55. Wainer H. Finding what is not there through the unfortunate binning of results: the Mendel effect. Chance 2006, 19:49-52.
56. Wilson K.A. Dealing with data uncertainty in conservation planning. Nat. Conserv. 2010, 8:145-150.