Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion

Journal of Vision

Volumn 12, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Kafaligonul, Hulusi ^a   Stoner, Gene R ^a  

^a SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross modal interactions; Motion perception; Motion processing; Multisensory; Temporal ventriloquism

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEARING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SOUND; TIME PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SOUND; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 84870278745     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/12.11.2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of Optical Society of America A, 2, 284-299.
2. Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004a). No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 185-194.
3. Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004b). The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology, 14, 257-262.
4. Alink, A., Euler, F., Galeano, E., Krugliak, A., Singer, W., & Kohler, A. (2012). Auditory motion capturing ambiguous visual motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 391.
5. Anstis, S. M. (1970). Phi movement as a subtraction process. Vision Research, 10, 1411-1430.
6. Anstis, S. M. (1980). The perception of apparent movement. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences, 290, 153- 168.
7. Bertelson, P., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 482-489.
8. Bours, R. J., Kroes, M. C., & Lankheet, M. J. (2009). Sensitivity for reverse-phi motion. Vision Research, 49, 1-9.
9. Braddick, O. J. (1980). Low-level and high level processes in apparent motion. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences, 290, 137-151.
10. Cavanagh, P. (1992). Attention-based motion perception. Science, 257, 1563-1565.
11. Chubb, C., & Sperling, G. (1989). Two motion perception mechanisms revealed through distancedriven reversal of apparent motion. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA, 86, 2985-2989.
12. Claeys, K. G., Lindsey, D. T., De Schutter, E., & Orban, G. A. (2003). A higher order motion region in human inferior parietal lobule: Evidence from fMRI. Neuron, 40, 451-452.
13. Emerson, R. C., Citron, M. C., Vaughn, W. J., & Klein, S. A. (1987). Nonlinear directionally selective subunits in complex cells of cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 58, 33-65.
14. Fendrich, R., & Corballis, P. M. (2001). The temporal cross-capture of audition and vision. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 719-725.
15. Freeman, E., & Driver, J. (2008). Direction of visual apparent motion driven solely by timing of a static sound. Current Biology, 18, 1262-1266.
16. Getzmann, S. (2007). The effect of brief auditory stimuli on visual apparent motion. Perception, 36, 1089-1103.
17. Hidaka, S., Manaka, Y., Teramoto, W., Sugita, Y., Miyauchi, R., Gyoba, J., et al. (2009). Alternation of sound location induces visual motion perception of a static object. PLoS ONE, 4(12), e8188.
18. Hidaka, S., Teramoto, W., Sugita, Y., Manaka, Y., Sakamoto, S., & Suzuki, Y. (2011). Auditory motion information drives visual motion perception. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e17499.
19. Ho, C. S., & Giaschi, D. E. (2009). Low- and high-level first-order random-dot kinematograms: Evidence from fMRI. Vision Research, 49, 1814-1824.
20. Howard, I. P., & Templeton, W. B. (1966). Human spatial orientation. London: Wiley.
21. Kafaligonul, H., & Stoner, G. R. (2010). Auditory modulation of visual apparent motion with short spatial and temporal intervals. Journal of Vision, 10(12):31, 1-13, http://www.journalofvision.org/ content/10/12/31, doi:10.1167/10.12.31. [PubMed] [Article]
22. Kayser, C., Petkov, C. I., & Logothetis, N. K. (2008). Visual modulation of neurons in auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1560-1574.
23. Kim, R., Peters, M. A. K., & Shams, L. (2011). 0+1>1: How adding noninformative sound improves performance on a visual task. Psychological Science, 23, 6-12.
24. Krekelberg, B., & Albright, T. D. (2005). Motion mechanisms in macaque MT. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 2908-2921.
25. Lakatos, P., Chen, C. M., O'Connell, M. N., Mills, A., & Schroeder, C. E. (2007). Neuronal oscillations and multisensory interaction in primary auditory cortex. Neuron, 53, 279-292.
26. Lu, Z. L., & Sperling, G. (1995). The functional architecture of human visual motion perception. Vision Research, 35, 2697-2722.
27. Lugo, J. E., Doti, R., & Faubert, J. (2008). Ubiquitous crossmodal stochastic resonance in humans: auditory noise facilitates tactile, visual and proprioceptive sensations. PLoS ONE, 3(8), e2860.
28. Lugo, J. E., Doti, R., & Faubert, J. (2012). Effective tactile noise facilitates visual perception. Seeing and Perceiving, 25, 29-44.
29. Lugo, J. E., Doti, R., Wittich, W., & Faubert, J. (2008). Multisensory integration: central processing modifies peripheral systems. Psychological Science, 19, 989-997.
30. Meyer, G. F., & Wuerger, S. M. (2001). Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals. Neuroreport, 12, 2557-2560.
31. Meyer, G. F., Wuerger, S. M., Röhrbein, F., & Zetzsche, C. (2005). Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 538-547.
32. Morein-Zamir, S., Soto-Faraco, S., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 154-163.
33. Moss, F., Ward, L., & Sannita, W. (2004). Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: a tutorial and review of application. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 267-281.
34. Recanzone, G. H. (2003). Auditory influences on visual temporal rate perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 1078-1093.
35. Sanabria, D., Spence, C., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Perceptual and decisional contributions to audiovisual interactions in the perception of apparent motion: A signal detection study. Cognition, 102, 299-310.
36. Sato, T. (1989). Reversed apparent motion with random dot patterns. Vision Research, 29, 1749- 1758.
37. Shi, Z., Chen, L., & Mü ller, H. J. (2010). Auditory temporal modulation of the visual Ternus effect: the influence of time interval. Experimental Brain Research, 203, 723-735.
38. Soto-Faraco, S., Kingstone, A., & Spence, C. (2003). Multisensory contributions to the perception of motion. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1847-1862.
39. Staal, H. E., & Donderi, D. C. (1983). The effect of sound on visual apparent movement. American Journal of Psychology, 96, 95-105.
40. Teramoto, W., Manaka, Y., Hidaka, S., Sugita, Y., Miyauchi, R., Sakamoto, S., et al. (2010). Visual motion perception induced by sounds in vertical plane. Neuroscience Letters, 479, 221-225.
41. Thorne, J. D., De Vos, M., Viola, F. C., & Debener, S. (2011). Cross-modal phase reset predicts auditory task performance in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 3853-3861.
42. Wehrhahn, C. (2006). Reversed phi revisited. Journal of Vision, 6(10):2, 1018-1025, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/6/10/2, doi:10.1167/6. 10.2. [PubMed] [Article]
43. Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001a). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 1293-1313.
44. Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001b). The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 1314-1329.