Perceptual and decisional contributions to audiovisual interactions in the perception of apparent motion: A signal detection study

Cognition

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 299-310

  Sanabria, Daniel ^a   Spence, Charles ^a   Soto Faraco, Salvador ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Apparent motion; Audition; Crossmodal interactions; Motion perception; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL DETECTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33845505294     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alais D., and Burr D. No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection. Cognitive Brain Research 19 (2004) 185-194
2. Aschersleben, G., Bachmann, T., & Musseler, J. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
3. Bertelson P., and de Gelder B. The psychology of multimodal perception. In: Spence C., and Driver J. (Eds). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford 141-179
4. Bonnel A., and Hafter E. Divided attention between simultaneous auditory and visual signals. Perception & Psychophysics 60 (1998) 179-190
5. Bosbach S., Prinz W., and Kerzel D. A Simon effect with stationary moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 39-55
6. Bosbach S., Prinz W., and Kerzel D. Is direction position? Position and direction-based correspondence effects in tasks with moving stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A (2005) 467-506
7. Chmiel N. Response effect in the perception of conjunctions of colour and form. Psychological Research 51 (1989) 117-122
8. de Gelder B., and Bertelson P. Multisensory integration, perception, and ecological validity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 460-467
9. Gómez, P., Perea, M., & Ratcliff, R. (submitted for publication). A model of the go/no-go lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
10. Kitagawa N., and Ichihara S. Hearing visual motion in depth. Nature 416 (2002) 172-174
11. Macmillan N.A., and Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
12. Mateeff S., Hohnsbein J., and Noack T. Dynamic visual capture: Apparent auditory motion induced by a moving visual target. Perception 14 (1985) 721-727
13. Meyer G.F., and Wuerger S.M. Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals. Neuroreport 12 (2001) 2557-2560
14. Meyer G.F., Wuerger S.M., Röhrbein F., and Zetzsche C. Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation. Experimental Brain Research 166 (2005) 538-547
15. Morein-Zamir S., Soto-Faraco S., and Kingstone A. Auditory capture of vision: Examining temporal ventriloquism. Cognitive Brain Research 17 (2003) 154-163
16. Perea M., Rosa E., and Gómez C. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?. Memory & Cognition 30 (2002) 34-45
17. Sanabria D., Soto-Faraco S., Chan J., and Spence C. Intramodal perceptual grouping modulates multisensory integration: Evidence from the crossmodal dynamic capture task. Neuroscience Letters 377 (2005) 59-64
18. Simon J.R. The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In: Proctor R.W., and Reeve T.G. (Eds). Stimulus-response compatibility (1990), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 31-86
19. Soto-Faraco S., and Kingstone A. Multisensory integration of dynamic information. In: Calvert G.A., Spence C., and Stein B.E. (Eds). The handbook of multisensory processes (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 49-68
20. Soto-Faraco S., Kingstone A., and Spence C. Multisensory contributions to the perception of motion. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 1847-1862
21. Soto-Faraco S., Lyons J., Gazzaniga M., Spence C., and Kingstone A. The ventriloquist in motion: Illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities. Cognitive Brain Research 14 (2002) 139-146
22. Soto-Faraco S., Spence C., and Kingstone A. Cross-modal dynamic capture: Congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 330-345
23. Soto-Faraco S., Spence C., and Kingstone A. Assessing automaticity in the audio-visual integration of motion. Acta Psychologica 118 (2005) 71-92
24. Spence, C., & Driver, J. (Eds.). (2004). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Spence, C., Sanabria, D., & Soto-Faraco, S. (in press). Intersensory Gestalten and crossmodal scene perception. In K. Noguchi (Ed.). The psychology of beauty and Kansei: New horizon of Gestalt perception (to appear).
26. Vroomen J., and de Gelder B. Visual motion influences the contingent auditory motion aftereffect. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 357-361
27. Welch R.B. Meaning, attention, and the "unity assumption" in the intersensory bias of spatial and temporal perceptions. In: Aschersleben G., Bachmann T., and Müsseler J. (Eds). Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (1999), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 371-387
28. Welch R.B., and Warren D.H. Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin 88 (1980) 638-667
29. Wuerger S.M., Hofbauer M., and Meyer G.F. The integration of auditory and visual motion signals at threshold. Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003) 1188-1196
30. Zapparoli G.C., and Reatto L.L. The apparent movement between visual and acoustic stimulus and the problem of intermodal relations. Acta Psychologica 29 (1969) 256-267