Phylogenetics of the marine sculpins (Teleostei: Cottidae) of the North American Pacific Coast

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 341-349

  Knope, Matthew L ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Allopatry; Intertidal; Radiation; Speciation; Subtidal; Sympatry

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME B; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS; INTRON; NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC OCEAN; PERCIFORMES; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOCHROMES B; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC SPECIATION; INTRONS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC OCEAN; PERCIFORMES; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

ARTEDIUS; CLINOCOTTUS; COTTIDAE; LEIOCOTTUS; OLIGOCOTTUS; PISCES; RUSCARIUS; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 84870241872     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Bernardi G., Bucciarelli G. Molecular phylogeny and speciation of the surfperches (Embiotocidae, Perciformes). Mol. Phylo. Evol. 1999, 13:77-81.
2. Bernardi G., Talley D. Genetic evidence for limited dispersal in the coastal California killifish, Fundulus parvipinnis. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2000, 255:187-199.
3. Bernardi G. Phylogeography and demography of sympatric sister surfperch species, Embiotoca jacksoni and E. lateralis along the California coast: historical versus ecological factors. Evolution 2005, 59:386-394.
4. Burford M.O., Bernardi G. Incipient speciation with a subgenus of rockfish (Sebastosomus) provides evidence of recent radiations within an ancient species flock. Mar. Biol. 2008, 154:701-717.
5. Begle D.P. Phylogenetic analysis of the cottid genus Artedius (Teleostei: Scorpaeniformes). Copeia 1989, 3:642-652.
6. Berg L.S. Classification of Fishes both Recent and Fossil 1947, J.W. Edwards, Mich. Ann Arbor.
7. Bolin R.L. A revision of the genus Icelinus Jordan. Copeia 1936, 3:151-159.
8. Bolin R.L. A review of the marine cottid fishes of California. Stanford Ichthy. Bull. 1944, 3:1-135.
9. Bolin R.L. The evolution of the marine Cottidae of California with a discussion of the genus as a systematic category. Stanford Ichthy. Bull. 1947, 3:153-168.
10. Budd P.L. Development of the eggs and early larvae of six California fishes 1940, California Department of Fish and Game, Fish Bulletin, 56.
11. Cowen R.K., Paris C.B., Srinivasan A. Science 2006, 311:522-527.
12. Crow K.D., Kanamoto Z., Bernardi G. Molecular phylogeny of the hexagrammid fishes using a multi-locus approach. Mol. Phylo. Evol. 2004, 32:986-997.
13. David, L.R., 1943. Miocene Fishes of Southern California. Geol. Soc. Amer. Special Papers Number 43.
14. Drummond, A.J., Ashton, B., Cheung, M., Heled, J., Kearse, M., Moir, R., Stones-Havas, S., Thierer, T., Wilson, A., 2009. Geneious v4.7.
15. Eastman J.T., McCune A.R. Fishes on the Antarctic continental shelf: evolution of a marine species flock?. J. Fish Biol. 2000, 57:84-102.
16. Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl. Acids Res. 2004, 32:1792-1797.
17. Eschmeyer W.N., Herald E.S., Hamann H. A field guide to Pacific Coast fishes of North America. Peterson Field Guide Series 1983, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston.
18. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:83-91.
19. Gill T. On the classification of the mail-cheeked fishes. Proc. US Natl. Mus. 1889, 567-592.
20. Guindon S., Gascuel O. A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52:696-704.
21. Hasegawa M., Kishino H., Yano T.A. Dating of the human ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial-DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 1985, 22:160-174.
22. Howe, K.M., Richardson, S.L., 1978. Taxonomic Review and Meristic Variation in Marine Sculpins (Osteichthyes: Cottidae) of the Northeast Pacific Ocean. National Marine Fisheries Report.
23. Hubbs C.L. A revision of the fishes of the subfamily Oligocottinae 1926, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
24. Hubbs C.L. Fertilization, initiation of cleavage, and development temperature tolerance of the cottid fish, Clinocottus analis. Copeia 1966, 1966:29-42.
25. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755.
26. Hyde J.R., Vetter R.D. The origin, evolution, and diversification of rockfishes of the genus Sebastes (Cuvier). Mol. Phyl. Evol. 2007, 44:790-811.
27. Irwin D.M., Kocher T.D., Wilson A.C. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 1991, 32:128-144.
28. Jackson, K.L., 2003. Contributions to the Systematics of Cottoid Fishes (Teleostei: Scorpaeniformes). Dept. of Biological Sciences. University of Alberta, pp. 13, 181 leaves 128cm.
29. Kinziger A.P., Wood R.M., Neely D.A. Molecular systematics and classification of Cottus and the Baikalian cottoids (Scorpaeniformes). Copeia 2005, 2005:303-311.
30. Lamb A., Edgell P. Coastal Fishes of the Pacific Northwest 2010, Harbour Publishing, Madeira Park, British Columbia.
31. Losos J.B., Glor R.E. Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geography of speciation. Tree 2003, 18:220-227.
32. Love M. Certainly More than You Want to Know About the Fishes of the Pacific Coast 2011, Really Big Press, Santa Barbara, CA.
33. Macfarlane J.M. The Evolution and Distribution of Fishes 1923, The Macmillan Company, New York.
34. Mandic M., Todgham A.E., Richards J.G. Mechanisms and evolution of hypoxia tolerance in fish. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B 2009, 276:735-744.
35. Marliave J.B. Lack of planktonic dispersal of rocky intertidal fish larvae. Trans. Am. Fish Soc. 1986, 115:149-154.
36. Mecklenburg, C.W., Mecklenburg, T.A., Thorsteinson, L.K., 2002. Fishes of Alaska. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. 1037 pp.
37. Miglietta M.P., Faucci A., Santini F. Speciation in the sea: overview of the symposium and discussion of future directions. Integr. Compar. Biol. 2011, 51(3):449-455.
38. Miller D.J., Lea R.N. Guide to the Coastal Marine Fishes of California 1972, Cal. Dept. Fish and Game Fish Bull, Sacramento, CA.
39. Fishes of Japan 2002, Tokai University Press, Tokyo. T. Nakobo (Ed.).
40. Nelson J.S. Two new South Pacific fishes of the genus Ebinania and contributions to the systematics of Psychrolutidae (Scorpaeniformes). Can. J. Zool. 1982, 60:1470-1504.
41. Nelson D.W. Systematics and distribution of cottid fishes of the genera Rastrinus and Icelus. Occas. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1984, 138:58 pp.
42. Nelson J.S. Fishes of the World 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey.
43. Neylov, A.V., 1976. Survey of the fringed sculpins of the genus Porocottus Gill and closely related genera (Cottidae, Myoxocephalinae). In: V.M. Korovina (Ed.), Zoogeography and Systematics of Fishes. Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, pp 78-112 (in Russian).
44. Neylov, A.V., 1979. Seismosensory system and classification of sculpins (Cottidae: Myoxocephalinae, Artediellinae). Leningrad, Nauka. 208 pp (in Russian).
45. Palumbi S.R. Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1994, 25:547-572.
46. Palumbi, S.R., 1996. The Simple Fool's Guide to PCR. Dept. of Zoology and Kewalo Marine Laboratory, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.
47. Peden A.E. A systematic revision of the hemilepidotine fishes (Cottidae). Syesis 1978, 11:11-49.
48. Peden A.E. Redefinition of Icelinus fimbriatus and I. oculatus (Cottidae, Pisces), and their corrected geographic distributions, with a new key to the genus. Syesis 1984, 17:67-80.
49. Pietsch T.W. Systematics and distribution of cottid fishes of the genus Triglops Reinhardt (Teleosti: Scorpaeniformes). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1994, 109(4):335-393.
50. Posada D. JModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:1253-1256.
51. Ramon, M.L., 2007. Molecular Ecology of Intertidal Sculpins. PhD Thesis, UCSC.
52. Ramon M.L., Knope M.L. Molecular support for marine sculpin (Cottidae; Oligocottinae) diversification during the transition from the subtidal to intertidal habitat in the Northeastern Pacific Ocean. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2008, 46:475-483.
53. Rosenblatt R.H., Smith W.L. Icelinus limbaughi: a new species of sculpin (Teleostei: Cottidae) from southern California. Copeia 2004, 3:556-561.
54. Sado T., Tachibana Y., Kimura S. Developmental morphology of the cottid fish Pseudoblennius marmoratus. Ichth. Res. 2005, 52:292-296.
55. Sandercock F.K., Wilimovsky N.J. Revision of the cottid genus Enophrys. Copeia 1968, 4:832-853.
56. Quast, J.C., Hall, E.L., 1972. List of Fishes of Alaska and Adjacent Waters with a Guide to Some of Their Literature. U.S. Dep. Commer. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS SSRF-658. 47 pp (with errata sheet data 20 December 1972).
57. Schluter D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
58. Shanks A.L., Shearman R.K. Paradigm lost? Cross-shelf distribution of intertidal larvae are unaffected by upwelling or downwelling. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2009, 384:189-204.
59. Shimodaira H., Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16:1114-1116.
60. Simpson G.G. The Major Features of Evolution 1953, Columbia University Press, New York.
61. Smith W.L., Wheeler W.C. Polyphyly of the mail-cheeked fishes (Teleostei: Scorpaeniformes): evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2004, 32:627-646.
62. Strauss S.E. Relationships among the cottid genera Artedius, Clinocottus, and Oligocottus (Teleostei: Scorpaeniformes). Copeia 1993, 2:518-522.
63. Swank, S.E., 1979. Population Genetics and Evolution of Some Intertidal Fishes of the Genus Clinocottus. PhD Thesis, University of Southern California.
64. Swearer S.E., Caselle J.E., Lea D.W., Warner R.R. Larval retention and recruitment in an island population of a coral-reef fish. Nature 1999, 402:799-802.
65. *and Other Methods) 2002, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
66. Taranets, A.Y., 1941. On the classification and origin of the family Cottidae. Isues. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Otd. Biol. 1943(3), 427-447 (Translated from Russian, Inst. Fish., Univ. British Columbia Mus. Contr. vol. 5, pp. 1-28).
67. Waples R.S. A multispecies approach to the analysis of gene flow in marine shore fishes. Evolution 1987, 41:385-400.
68. Washington, B.B., Eschmeyer, W.N., Howe, K.M., 1984. Scorpaeniformes: relationships. In: H.G. Moser et al., (Eds.), Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. Am. Soc. Ichthyol. Herpetol. Spec. Publ. vol. 1, pp. 438-447.
69. Washington B.B. Systematic relationships and ontogeny of the sculpins Artedius, Clinocottus, and Oligocottus (Cottidae: Scorpaeniformes). Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1986, 44:157-224.
70. Watanabe M. Fauna Japonica: Cottidae (pisces) 1969, Tokyo News Service, Tokyo.
71. Wilson, D.E., 1973. Revision of the Cottid Genus Gymnocanthus, with a Description of their Osteology. M.S. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. 223 pp.
72. Yabe M., Tsumura K., Katayama M. Description of a new cottid fish, Icelinus japonicus, from Japanese waters. Jpn. J. Ichthyol. 1980, 27:106-110.
73. Yabe M. Comparative Osteology and myology of the superfamily Cottoidea (Pisces: Scorpaeniformes), and its phylogenetic classification. Faculty of Fisheries 1985, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Japan.
74. Yabe M., Soma A., Amaoka K. Icelinus pietschi sp. nov. and a rare species, Sigmistes smithi, from the southern Kuril Achipelago (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae). Ichthyol. Res. 2001, 48(1):65-70.
75. Yokoyama R., Goto A. Evolutionary history of freshwater sculpins, genus Cottus (Teleostei: Cottidae) and related taxa, as inferred from mitochondrial DNA phylogeny. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2005, 36:654-668.
76. Yoshiyama R.M., Sassaman C., Lea R.N. Rocky intertidal fish communities of California: temporal and spatial variation. Env. Biol. Fishes 1986, 17(1):23-40.
77. Yoshiyama R.M., Gaylord K.B., Philippar M.T., Moore T.R., Jordan J.R., Coon C.C., Schalk L.L., Valpey C.J., Tosques I. Homing behavior and site fidelity intertidal sculpins (Pisces: Cottidae). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1992, 160:115-130.