Prolegomena to a typology of morphological features

Morphology

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 231-246

  Corbett, Greville G ^a   Baerman, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Inflectional class; Morphological feature; Morphosyntactic feature; Network Morphology; Typology

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547371117     PISSN: 18715621     EISSN: 18715656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11525-006-9105-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 22). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Baerman, M., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. G. (2005). The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Booij, G. (2005). Construction-dependent morphology. Lingue e linguaggio, IV.2, 163-178.
4. Brown, D. (1998). Stem indexing and morphonological selection in the Russian verb: A network morphology account In R. Fabri, A. Ortmann, & T. Parodi (Eds.), Models of inflection (pp. 196-224). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
5. Brown, D., Corbett, G. G., Fraser, N. M., Hippisley, A., & Timberlake, A. (1996). Russian noun stress and network morphology. Linguistics, 34, 53-107.
6. Browne, W. (1993). Serbo-Croat. In B. Comrie, & G. G. Corbett (Eds.), The Slavonic languages (pp. 306-387). London: Routledge.
7. Corbett, G. G. (1982). Gender in Russian: An account of gender specification and its relationship to declension. Russian Linguistics, 6, 197-232.
8. Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Corbett, G. G. (2005). The canonical approach in typology. In Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodges, & D. S. Rood (Eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories (Studies in Language Companion Series 72) (pp. 25-49). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
10. Corbett, G. G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Corbett, G. G. (forthcoming a). Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. To appear in Language, 83.
12. Corbett, G. G. (forthcoming b). Deponency, syncretism, and what lies between. To appear. In M. Baerman, G. G. Corbett, D. Brown, & A. Hippisley (Eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches. Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.
13. Corbett, G. G., & Fraser, N. M. (1993). Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian inflectional morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 29, 113-142.
14. [Reprinted 2003 In: F. X. Katamba (Ed.), Morphology: Critical concepts in linguistics, VI: Morphology: Its place in the wider context (pp. 364-396) London: Routledge.]
15. Evans, N., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. G. (2002). The semantics of gender in Mayali: Partially parallel systems and formal implementation. Language, 78, 111-155.
16. Feldstein, R. (2001). A concise Polish grammar. Durham and Chapel Hill: Slavic and East European Language Resource Center. Available from 〈http://www.seelrc.org/projects/grammars.ptml〉.
17. Finkel, R., & Stump, G. (2006). Principal parts and morphological typology. Technical Report No. 459-06, Department of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, ftp://ftp.cs.uky.edu/cs/techreports/459-06.pdf
18. Gudkov, V. (1965). Dodatak pravilima slaganja predikata sa više subjekata. Književnost i jezik, 12, 60-61.
19. Gudkov, V. (1974). Prilog o pravilima kongruencije. Književnost i jezik, 21, 58-61.
20. Kettunen, L. (1938). Livisches Wörterbuch mit grammatischer Einleitung. Helsinki: Suomalais Ugrilainen Seura.
21. Kutsch Lojenga, C. (1994). Ngiti: A Central-Sudanic language of Zaire (Nilo-Saharan Linguistic Analyses and Documentation, 9). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe, [cited from Finkel & Stump (2006)]
22. Leko, N. (1986). Syntax of noun headed structures in Serbo-Croatian and corresponding phrasal structures in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University. Distributed by University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, reference 86-28003.
23. Lenček, R. (1972). O zaznamovanosti in nevtralizaciji slovnične kategorije spola v slovenskem knjižnem jeziku. Slavistična revija, 20, 55-63.
24. Matthews, P. H. (1972). Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Plank, F. (1980). Encoding grammatical relations: Acceptable and unacceptable non-distinctness. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical morphology (pp. 289-325). The Hague: Mouton.
26. Schachtl, S. (1989). Morphological case and abstract case: evidence from the German genitive construction. In C. Bhatt, E. Löbel, & C. Schmidt (Eds.), Syntactic phrase structure phenomena in noun phrases and sentences (pp. 99-111). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. Spencer, A. Paradigm-based morphosyntax: The German genitive. Manuscript, University of Essex.
28. Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Stump, G. T. (2004). Morphosyntactic conditions of morphomic dimensions of stem alternation. Paper read at the Workshop "Possible word" at the 11th International Morphology Meeting, University of Vienna, 13.2.2004.
30. Stump, G. T. (2006). Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage. Language, 82, 279-322.
31. Wechsler, S., & Zlatić, L. (2003). The many faces of agreement. Stanford: CSLI.
32. Zaliznjak, A. A. (1967). Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie. Moscow: Nauka.
33. Zwicky, A. M. (1986). German adjective agreement in GPSG. Linguistics, 24, 957-990.
34. Zwicky, A. M. (1992). Jottings on adpositions, case inflections, government, and agreement. In D. Brentari, G. N. Larson, & L. A. MacLeod (Eds), The joy of grammar: A festschrift in honor of James D. McCawley (pp. 369-383). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
35. Zwicky, A. M. (1996). Syntax and phonology. In K. Brown, & J. Miller (Eds.), Concise Encyclopedia of Syntactic Theories (pp. 300-305). Oxford: Elsevier Science.