Comparison of membrane filtration performance between biofilm-MBR and activated sludge-MBR

Desalination and Water Treatment

Volumn 48, Issue 1-3, 2012, Pages 285-293

  Sun, Cheng ^a   Leiknes, Torove ^a   Fredriksen, Ranveig Haukeland ^a   Riviere, Eline ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

As MBR; BF MBR; Fouling; Membrane; Submicron particles; Suspended solid

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870210324     PISSN: 19443994     EISSN: 19443986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2012.698824     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. I. Ivanovic and T. Leiknes, Impact of aeration rates on particle colloidal fraction in the biofilm membrane bioreactor (bf-mbr). Desalination, 231 (1-3) (2008) 182-190.
2. T. Leiknes and H. Ødegaard, The development of a biofilm membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 202 (1-3) (2007) 135-143.
3. T. Leiknes, H. Bolt, M. Engmann and H. Ødegaard, Assessment of membrane reactor design in the performance of a hybrid biofilm membrane bioreactor (bf-mbr). Desalination, 199 (1-3) (2006) 328-330.
4. J. Phatt aranawik and T. Leiknes, Double-deck aerated biofilm membrane bioreactor with sludge control for municipal wastewater treatment. AIChE J., 55(5) (2009) 1291-1297.
5. C. Sun, T. Leiknes, J. Weitz enböck and B. Thorstensen, Development of a biofilm-mbr for shipboard wastewater treatment: The effect of process configuration. Desalination, 250 (2) (2010) 745-750.
6. J. Lee, W.-Y. Ahn and C.-H. Lee, Comparison of the filtration characteristics between att ached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res., 35 (10) (2001) 2435-2445.
7. S. Yang, F. Yang, Z. Fu and R. Lei, Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal. Biores. Technol., 100 (8) (2009) 2369-2374.
8. S. Yang, F. Yang, Z. Fu and R. Lei, Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on membrane fouling. Biores. Technol., 100 (24) (2009) 6655-6657.
9. H.C. Flemming, G. Schaule, T. Griebe, J. Schmitt and A. Tamachkiarowa, Biofouling - the achilles heel of membrane processes. Desalination, 113 (2-3) (1997) 215-225.
10. N. Janga, X. Ren, G. Kim, C. Ahn, J. Cho and I.S. Kim, Characteristics of soluble microbial products and extracellular polymeric substances in the membrane bioreactor for water reuse. Desalination, 202 (1-3) (2007) 90-98.
11. S. Lyko, D. Al-Halbouni, T. Wintgens, A. Janot, J. Hollender, W. Dott and T. Melin, Polymeric compounds in activated sludge supernatant - characterisation and retention mechanisms at a full-scale municipal membrane bioreactor. Water Res., 41 (17) (2007) 3894-3902.
12. U. Metz ger, P. Le-Clech, R.M. Stuetz, F.H. Frimmel and V. Chen, Characterisation of polymeric fouling in membrane bioreactors and the effect of different filtration modes. J. Membr. Sci., 301 (1-2) (2007) 180-189.
13. R.M. Åhl, T. Leiknes and H. Ødegaard, Tracking particle size distributions in a moving bed biofilm membrane reactor for treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Sci. Technol., 53 (7) (2006) 33-42.
14. T.-H. Bae and T.-M. Tak, Interpretation of fouling characteristics of ultrafiltration membranes during the filtration of membrane bioreactor mixed liquor. J. Membr. Sci., 264 (1-2) (2005) 151-160.
15. I. Ivanovic, T. Leiknes and H. Ødegaard, Influence of loading rates on production and characteristics of retentate from a biofilm membrane bioreactor (bf-mbr). Desalination, 199 (1-3) (2006) 490-492.
16. C.W. Randall and D. Sen, Full-scale evaluation of an integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) process for enhanced nitrogen removal. Water Sci. Technol, 33 (12) (1996) 155-162.
17. T.L. Johnson, J.P. McQuarrie and A.R. Shaw, Integrated fixedfilm activated sludge (IFAS): The new choice for nitrogen removal upgrades in the united states. Proc, Water Environ. Fed., 2004 (16) (2004) 296-318.
18. Q. Liu, X.C. Wang, Y. Liu, H. Yuan and Y. Du, Performance of a hybrid membrane bioreactor in municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination, 258 (1-3) (2010) 143-147.
19. X.C. Wang, Q. Liu and Y.J. Liu, Membrane fouling control of hybrid membrane bioreactor: Effect of extracellular polymeric substances. Separ. Sci. Technol., 45 (7) (2010) 928-934.
20. K. Sombatsompop, C. Visvanathan and R. Ben Aim, Evaluation of biofouling phenomenon in suspended and att ached growth membrane bioreactor systems. Desalination, 201 (1-3) (2006) 138-149.
21. Q. Yang, J. Chen and F. Zhang, Membrane fouling control in a submerged membrane bioreactor with porous, flexible suspended carriers. Desalination, 189 (1-3) (2006) 292-302.
22. X. Huang, C.-H. Wei and K.-C. Yu, Mechanism of membrane fouling control by suspended carriers in a submerged membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci., 309 (1-2) (2008) 7-16.
23. W.-N. Lee, I.-J. Kang and C.-H. Lee, Factors affecting filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled moving bed biofilm reactor. Water Res., 40 (9) (2006) 1827-1835.