Development of a biofilm-MBR for shipboard wastewater treatment: The effect of process configuration

Desalination

Volumn 250, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 745-750

  Sun, Cheng ^a   Leiknes, TorOve ^a   Weitzenböck, Jan ^b   Thorstensen, Bernt ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b DNV GL   (Norway)

^c KeraNor AS   (Norway)

Author keywords

Bilge water; Biofilm MBR; Dead end side stream; Recycle side stream; Shipboard wastewater

Indexed keywords

BILGE WATER; BIOFILM REACTORS; BIOFILM-MBR; BIOFLOCCULATION; BLACK WATER; FILTRATION UNIT; FLAT SHEETS; INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATIONS; MEMBRANE FILTRATIONS; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; OIL COMPOUNDS; OIL CONCENTRATION; PERMEATE QUALITY; PROCESS CONFIGURATION; RECYCLE SIDE-STREAM; SIDE STREAMS; WASTEWATER STREAMS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM;

BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIODEGRADATION; BIOFILMS; BIOFILTERS; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; BIOMASS; CERAMIC MEMBRANES; FLOCCULATION; HYDRAULICS; MEMBRANE FOULING; MICROFILTRATION; POROUS MATERIALS; RIVERS; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; SHIPS; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WATER RECYCLING; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIODEGRADATION; BIOFILM; DISCHARGE; FILTRATION; FLOCCULATION; FOULING; MEMBRANE; WASTEWATER;

EID: 71849094728     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.11.034     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. MARPOL 73/78. International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the protocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL 73/78), online at www.imo.org.
2. Ødegaard H., Rusten B., and Westrum T. A new moving bed biofilm reactor: Applications and results. Water Sci. Technol. 29 10-11 (1994) 157-165
3. Ødegaard H., Rusten B., and Siljudalen J. The development of the moving bed biofilm process-from idea to commercial product. Eur.Water Manag. 2 3 (1999) 36-43
4. Ivanovic I., Leiknes T., and Ødegaard H. Influence of loading rates on production and characteristics of retentate from a biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR). Desalination 199 1-3 (20 November 2006) 490-492
5. Leiknes T., and Ødegaard H. The development of a biofilm membrane reactor. Desalination 202 (2007) 135-143
6. Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., and Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28 3 (1956) 350-356
7. Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L., and Randall R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193 1 (1951) 265-275
8. Å hl R.M., Leiknes T., and Ødegaard H. Tracking particle size distributions in a moving bed biofilm membrane reactor for treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 53 7 (2006) 33-42
9. Bae T.H., and Tak T.M. Interpretation of fouling characteristics of ultrafiltration membranes during the filtration of membrane bioreactor mixed liquor. J. Membr. Sci. 264 (2005) 151-160
10. Laspidou C.S., and Rittmann B.E. A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res. 36 (2002) 2711-2720
11. Li H., Yang M., Zhang Y., Liu X., Gao M., and Kamagata Y. Comparison of nitrification performance and microbial community between submerged membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge system. Water Sci. Technol. 51 (2005) 193-200
12. Bouhabila E., Aim R., and Buisson H. Fouling characterization in membrane bioreactors. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22-23 1-3 (2001) 123-132
13. Lee W., Kang S., and Shin H. Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors. J. Membr. Sci. 216 1-2 (2003) 217-227
14. Lee S., Aurelle Y., and Roques H. Concentration polarization, membrane fouling and cleaning in ultrafiltration of soluble oil. J. Membr. Sci. 19 (1984) 23-38