Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on membrane fouling

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 100, Issue 24, 2009, Pages 6655-6657

  Yang, Shuai ^a   Yang, Fenglin ^a   Fu, Zhimin ^a   Lei, Ruibo ^b  

^a MOE   (China)

^b DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR); Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS); Filamentous bacteria; Membrane fouling; Moving bed membrane bioreactor (MBMBR)

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; CAKE LAYER; CONVENTIONAL MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (CMBR); CONVENTIONAL MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES (EPS); FILAMENTOUS BACTERIA; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MOVING BED; MOVING BED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBMBR); POLYSACCHARIDE CONTENTS; SUSPENDED SOLIDS;

BACTERIOLOGY; BIOCONVERSION; INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; POLYMERS; POLYSACCHARIDES;

BIOREACTORS;

POLYSACCHARIDE; PROTEIN;

BACTERIUM; BIOREACTOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOULING; MEMBRANE; SLUDGE;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL OVERGROWTH; BIOFOULING; BIOREACTOR; BIOREACTOR DESIGN; BIOREACTOR EQUIPMENT; CARBOHYDRATE ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MICROFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONTENT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER;

BIOREACTORS; FLOCCULATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; PARTICLE SIZE; PRESSURE; SOLUBILITY; SUSPENSIONS;

EID: 69049095901     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1995), American Public Health Association
2. Choi J.G., Bae T.H., Kim J.H., et al. The behavior of membrane fouling initiation on the cross-flow membrane bioreactor system. Journal of Membrane Science 203 (2002) 103-113
3. Frølund B., Palmgren R., Keiding K., et al. Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin. Water Research 30 (1996) 1749-1758
4. Lee J., Ahn W.Y., and Lee C.H. Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Research 35 10 (2001) 2435-2445
5. Lee W., Kang S., and Shin H. Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors. Journal of Membrane Science 216 (2003) 217-227
6. Lee S.A., Fane A.G., and Waite T.D. Impact of natural organic matter on floc size and structure effects in membrane filtration. Environmental Science and Technology 39 (2005) 6477-6486
7. Lim A.L., and Bai R. Membrane fouling and cleaning in microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater. Journal of Membrane Science 216 (2003) 279-290
8. Meng F.G., Zhang H.M., Yang F.L., et al. Effect of filamentous bacteria on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science 272 (2006) 161-168
9. Meng F.G., Yang F.L., Xiao J.N., et al. A new insight into membrane-fouling mechanism during membrane filtration of bulking and normal sludge suspension. Journal of Membrane Science 285 (2006) 159-165
10. Meng F.G., Chae S.-R., Drews A., et al. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Research 43 (2009) 1489-1512
11. Yang S., Yang F.L., Fu Z.M., et al. Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal. Bioresource Technology 100 8 (2009) 2369-2374