Performance of a hybrid membrane bioreactor in municipal wastewater treatment

Desalination

Volumn 258, Issue 1-3, 2010, Pages 143-147

  Liu, Qiang ^a,b   Wang, Xiaochang C ^a   Liu, Yongjun ^a   Yuan, Honglin ^a   Du, Yujiao ^a  

^a XI'AN UNIVERSITY OF ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Jinan Power Supply Company   (China)

Author keywords

Biofilm carrier; Hybrid membrane bioreactor (HMBR); Membrane fouling; Municipal wastewater

Indexed keywords

BIOFILM CARRIERS; COD REMOVAL RATE; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; CONVENTIONAL MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS; FAVORABLE CONDITIONS; HYBRID MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; HYBRID MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (HMBR); HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT; MUNICIPAL WASTEWATERS; NUTRIENTS REMOVAL; ORGANIC REMOVAL; PILOT SCALE; REMOVAL RATE; SLUDGE RETENTION TIME; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BIOCONVERSION; BIOFILMS; BIOFILTERS; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENTS; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; STABILIZATION PONDS; THERMOMECHANICAL PULPING PROCESS; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

BIOREACTORS;

BIOFILM; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FOULING; MEMBRANE; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 77953621976     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Meng F., Yang F., Xiao J., Zhang H., Gong Z. A new insight into membrane fouling mechanism during membrane filtration of bulking and normal sludge suspension. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 285:159-165.
2. Brindle K., Stephensen T. The application of membrane biological reactors for the treatment of wastewaters. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1996, 49:601-610.
3. van Dijk L., Ronchen G.C.G. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: the state of the art and new developments. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 35:35-41.
4. Wang Y., Huang X., Yuan Q. Nitrogen and carbon removals from food processing wastewater by an anoxic/aerobic membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:1733-1739.
5. Lim A.L., Bai R. Membrane fouling and cleaning in microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 216:279-290.
6. Artiga P., Oyanedel V., Garrido J.M., et al. An innovative biofilm-suspended biomass hybrid membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Desalination 2005, 179:171-179.
7. Mtinch E.V., Ban K., Watts S., et al. Suspended carrier technology allows upgrading highrate activated sludge plants for nitrogen removal via process intensification. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41(4-5):5-12.
8. Chang I.S., Le Clech P., Jefferson B., et al. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Eng. 2002, 128:1018-1029.
9. Nagaoka H., Yamanishi S., Miya A. Modeling of biofouling by extracellular polymers in a membrane separation activated sludge system. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 38:497-504.
10. Negaresh E., Le-Clech P., Chen V. Fouling mechanisms of model extracellular polymeric substances in submerged membrane reactor. Desalination 2006, 200:715-717.
11. Schwartz T.C., Herring B.R. The first year's performance of a membrane bioreactor compared with conventional wastewater treatment of domestic waste. Proceedings of WEFTEC 2001.
12. Huang X., Gui P., Qian Y. Effect of sludge retention time on microbial behaviour in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2001, 36:1001-1006.
13. APHA/AWWA/WEF Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC. 20th edn.
14. Marrot B., Barrios-Martinez A., Moulin P., et al. Biodegradation of high phenol concentration by activated sludge in an immersed membrane bioreactor. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 30:174-183.
15. Lante A., Crapisi A., Krastanov A., et al. Biodegradation of phenols by laccase immobilised in a membrane reactor. Process Biochem. 2000, 36(1-2):51-58.
16. Laitinen N., Luonsi A., Vilen J. Landfill leachate treatment with sequencing batch reactor and membrane bioreactor. Desalination 2006, 191:86-91.
17. Emori H., Mikawa K., Hamaya M., et al. Innovative biological nitrogen removal process using entrapped nitrifiers. Immobilised Cells: Basics and Applications 1996, 546-555. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
18. Pochanna K., Keller J., Lant P. Model development for simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39:235-243.
19. Galil N., Stahl N., Novak J.T., et al. The influence of mixing on physical characteristics of biological flocs. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1991, 63:768-772.
20. Zhang B., Yamamoto K., Ohgaki S., et al. Floc size distribution and bacterial activities in membrane separation activated sludge processes for small-scale wastewater treatment/reclamation. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 35:37-44.
21. Henriques I.D.S., Holbrook R.D., Kelly R.T., et al. The impact of floc size on respiration inhibition by soluble toxicants-a comparative investigation. Water Research 2005, 39:2559-2568.
22. Nanka J., Rebhun M. Organic groups and molecular weight distribution in tertiary effluents and removated waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 66:235-239.
23. Fang H.H.P., Xiao-shan J. Soluble microbial product (SMP) of acetotrophic methanogenesis. Bioresour. Technol. 1998, 66:235-239.
24. Rosenberger S., Laabs C., Lesjean B., et al. Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Research 2006, 40:710-720.
25. Park N., Kwon B., Kim I., et al. Biofouling potential of various NF membranes with respect to bacteria and their soluble microbial products (SMP): characterizations, flux decline, and transport parameters. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 258:43-54.
26. Li X.Y., Yang S.F. Influence of loosely bound extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on the flocculation, sedimentation and dewaterability of activated sludge. Water Research 2007, 41:1022-1030.