User acceptance of hedonic information technologies: A perceived value perspective

Association for Information Systems - 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2007: Reaching New Heights

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages 1705-1715

  Turel, Ofir ^a   Serenko, Alexander ^b   Bontis, Nick ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hedonic information technologies; Mobile commerce; Perceived value; Technology adoption

Indexed keywords

HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MOBILE COMMERCE; ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY; PERCEIVED VALUE; RING-TONES; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; THIRD-ORDER; USAGE INTENTION; USER ACCEPTANCE; WORD OF MOUTH;

HARDWARE;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84870160464     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckman (Eds.), Actioncontrol: From cognition to behavior: Springer-Verlag, 11-39.
2. Baker, J., Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Voss, G. B. (2002). The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions. Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 120-141.
3. Chin, W. W. (1997). Overview of the PLS method. Houston, TX, USA: University of Houston.
4. Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. Mahwa, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 295-336.
5. Chin, W. W. (2000) Partial Least Squares for Researchers: An overview and presentation of recent advances using the PLS approach, accessed April 5, 2006, [available at http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/icis2000plstalk.pdf].
6. Chin, W. W., & Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption Intention in Gss - Relative Importance of Beliefs. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 26(2-3), 42-64.
7. CNET (2004). Study: Online-game revenue to skyrocket. CNET News. New York, NY, USA: CNET Networks, 1-1.
8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
9. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
10. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
11. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal Of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269-277.
12. Dodds, W., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand and store information on buyers' product evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
13. Eggert, A., & Ulaga, W. (2002). Customer perceived value: A substitute for satisfaction business markets? The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(2/3), 107-118.
14. eMarketer (2007). Entertainment downloads are up - What's next? New York, NY, USA: eMarketer, 1-2.
15. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley.
16. Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(7), 7-18.
17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
18. Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association of Information Systems, 4(7), 1-77.
19. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 43(6), 740-755.
21. Lapierre, J. (2000). Customer perceived value in industrial contexts. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 15(2/3), 122-140.
22. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.
23. Lin, C. H., Sher, P. J., & Shih, H. Y. (2005). Past progress and future directions in conceptualizing customer perceived value. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(3-4), 318-336.
24. Lohmoller, J.-B. (1989). Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
25. Macklin, B. (2007). Digital Downloading: Music, Movies and TV. eMarketer Reports. New York, NY, USA: eMarketer, 1-16.
26. Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., & Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 39-56.
27. McKee, D., Simmers, C. S., & Licata, J. (2006). Customer self-efficacy and response to service. Journal of Service Research, 8(3), 207-220.
28. Petrick, J. F. (2002). Development of a multi-dimensional scale for measuring the perceived value of a service. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), 119-134.
29. Samson, A. (2006). Understanding the buzz that matters: negative vs positive word of mouth. International Journal of Market Research, 48(6), 647-657.
30. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why We Buy What We Buy - A Theory Of Consumption Values. Journal Of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170.
31. Strain, A., & Harari, J. (2006). Global digital music sales triple to US$1.1 Billion in 2005 as new market takes shape. London, UK: International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), 1-4.
32. Sweeney, J., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
33. Telecompaper (2005). Ringtones are becoming more popular in US. Houten, The Netherlands: Telecompaper, 1.
34. Toften, K., & Olsen, S. O. (2004). The relationships among quality, cost, value and use of export market information: An empirical study. Journal of International Marketing, 12(2), 104-131.
35. Turel, O., Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2007). User acceptance of wireless Short Messaging Services: Deconstructing perceived value. Information & Management, 44(1), 63-73.
36. Unger, L. S., & Kernan, J. B. (1983). On the meaning of leisure: An investigation of some of the determinants subjective experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 381-392.
37. van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. Mis Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704.
38. Yang, Z., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of switching costs. Psychology & Marketing, 21(10), 799-822.
39. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
40. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.