Supervised quality assessment of medical image registration: Application to intra-patient CT lung registration

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1521-1531

  Muenzing, Sascha E A ^a   van Ginneken, Bram ^a,b   Murphy, Keelin ^a   Pluim, Josien P W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b Diagnostic Image Analysis Group   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Image registration quality; Non rigid registration; Pattern recognition; Registration error; Supervised learning

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; IMAGE FEATURES; LOCAL ALIGNMENT; MEDICAL IMAGE REGISTRATION; NON-RIGID REGISTRATION ALGORITHMS; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; OPTIMAL SUBSETS; POINT CORRESPONDENCE; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; REGISTRATION ERROR; STATISTICAL IMAGES; TRAINING AND TESTING;

ALGORITHMS; ALIGNMENT; BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; OPTIMIZATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SUPERVISED LEARNING;

IMAGE REGISTRATION;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLASSIFIER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MEDICAL ERROR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REGISTRATION; THORAX EXAMINATION; TRAINING;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LUNG; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED;

EID: 84870057361     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Amit Y., Geman D. Shape quantization and recognition with randomized trees. Neural Computation 1997, 9:1545-1588.
2. Bauer E., Kohavi R. An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: bagging, boosting, and variants. Machine Learning 1999, 36:105-139.
3. Bradley A.P. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition 1997, 30:1145-1159.
4. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning 1996, 24:123-140.
5. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning 2001, 45:5-32.
6. Breiman, L., 2002. Manual on setting up, using, and understanding random forests v3.1.
7. Castillo R., Castillo E., Guerra R., Johnson V.E., McPhail T., Garg A.K., Guerrero T. A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2009, 54:1849-1870.
8. Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J., 2001. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm.
9. Crum W.R., Griffin L.D., Hawkes D.J. Automatic estimation of error in voxel-based registration. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2004, 821-828. Springer.
10. Duda R.O., Hart P.E., Stork D.G. Pattern Classification 2001, John Wiley and Sons, New York. second ed.
11. Duin, R., Juszczak, P., Paclik, P., Pekalska, E., de Ridder, D., Tax, D., Verzakov, S., 2007. PRTools4.1, A Matlab Toolbox for Pattern Recognition, Delft University of Technology.
12. Fedorov A., Billet E., Prastawa M., Gerig G., Radmanesh A., Warfield S.K., Kikinis R., Chrisochoides N. Evaluation of brain MRI alignment with the robust hausdorff distance measures. LNCS 2008, vol. 5358:594-603. Springer.
13. Fisher R.A. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics 1936, 7:179-188.
14. Freund Y., Schapire R.E. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 1997, 55:119-139.
15. ter Haar Romeny B. Front-End Vision and Multi-Scale Image Analysis: Multi-scale Computer Vision Theory and Applications 2009, Springer, written in Mathematica.
16. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983, 148:839-843.
17. Hill D.L., Batchelor P.G., Holden M., Hawkes D.J. Medical image registration. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2001, 46:R1-45.
18. Ho, T.K., 1995. Random decision forest. In: 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pp. 278-282.
19. Ho T.K. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1998, 20:832-844.
20. Isgum I., Staring M., Rutten A., Prokop M., Viergever M., van Ginneken B. Multi-atlas-based segmentation with local decision fusion - application to cardiac and aortic segmentation in CT scans. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2009, 28:1000-1010.
21. Jain A., Zongker D. Feature selection: evaluation, application, and small sample performance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1997, 19:153-158.
22. Jain A.K., Duin R.P.W., Mao J. Statistical pattern recognition: a review. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2000, 22:4-37.
23. Jin R., Liu Y. A framework for incorporating class priors into discriminative classification. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2005, 401-412. Springer. T. Ho, D. Cheung, H. Liu (Eds.).
24. Klein S., Staring M., Murphy K., Viergever M., Pluim J. elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2010, 29:196-205.
25. Klein S., Staring M., Pluim J.P.W. Evaluation of optimization methods for nonrigid medical image registration using mutual information and B-splines. Transactions on Medical Imaging 2007, 16:2879-2890.
26. Koenderink J.J. The structure of images. Biological Cybernetics 1984, 50:363-370.
27. Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 1995, 1137-1143. Morgan Kaufman, n.
28. Kohavi R., John G.H. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence 1997, 97:273-324.
29. Kotsiantis S. Combining bagging, boosting, rotation forest and random subspace methods. Artificial Intelligence Review 2011, 35:223-240.
30. Leow A.D., Yanovsky I., Chiang M.C., Lee A.D., Klunder A.D., Lu A., Becker J.T., Davis S.W., Toga A.W., Thompson P.M. Statistical properties of Jacobian maps and the realization of unbiased large-deformation nonlinear image registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2007, 26:822-832.
31. Lester H., Arridge S. A survey of hierarchical non-linear medical image registration. Pattern Recognition 1999, 32:129-149.
32. Liaw A., Wiener M. Classification and regression by random forest. R News 2002, 2:18-22.
33. Lindeberg T. Discrete derivative approximations with scale-space properties: a basis for low-level feature extraction. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 1993, 3:349-376.
34. Maier D. The Theory of Relational Databases 1983, Computer Science Press.
35. Maintz J.B.A., Viergever M.A. A survey of medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis 1998, 2:1-36.
36. Möller B., Posch S. An integrated analysis concept for errors in image registration. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis 2008, 18:201-206.
37. Muenzing, S.E.A., Murphy, K., van Ginneken, B., Pluim, J.P.W., 2009. Automatic detection of registration errors for quality assessment in medical image registration. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, pp. 72590K-72590K-9.
38. Muenzing, S.E.A., van Ginneken, B., Pluim, J.P.W., 2012. On combining algorithms for deformable image registration. In: Proceedings of the WBIR, vol. 7359, pp. 256-265.
39. Murphy K., van Ginneken B., Klein S., Staring M., de Hoop B., Viergever M., Pluim J.P. Semi-automatic construction of reference standards for evaluation of image registration. Medical Image Analysis 2011, 15:71-84.
40. Osborne J.W., Carolina N. Improving your data transformations: applying the box-cox transformation. Practical Assessment Research Evaluation 2010, 15:2.
41. Park H., Bland P.H., Brock K.K., Meyer C.R. Adaptive registration using local information measures. Medical Image Analysis 2004, 8:465-473.
42. Pluim J.P.W., Maintz J.B.A., Viergever M.A. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2003, 22:986-1004.
43. Reunanen J. Overfitting in making comparisons between variable selection methods. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2003, 3:1371-1382.
44. van Rikxoort E., de Hoop B., Viergever M., Prokop M., van Ginneken B. Automatic lung segmentation from thoracic computed tomography scans using a hybrid approach with error detection. Medical Physics 2009, 36:2934-2947.
45. Sakia R.M. The box-cox transformation technique: a review. The Statistician 1992, 41:169.
46. Schapire R.E. The boosting approach to machine learning: an overview. Nonlinear Estimation and Classification 2002, Springer.
47. Sofka M., Stewart C.V. Location registration and recognition (LRR) for longitudinal evaluation of corresponding regions in CT volumes. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2008, 989-997. Springer.
48. Sturges H.A. The choice of a class interval. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1926, 21:65-66.
49. Tieu K., Viola P. Boosting image retrieval. International Journal of Computer Vision 2000, 228-235.
50. Toussaint G. Bibliography on estimation of misclassification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1974, 20:472-479.
51. Viola, P., Jones, M., 2001. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hawaii.
52. Viola P., Jones M. Robust real-time face detection. International Journal of Computer Vision 2004, 57:137-154.
53. Xu D., Gietema H., de Koning H., Vernhout R., Nackaerts K., Prokop M., Weenink C., Lammers J., Groen H., Oudkerk M., van Klaveren R. Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial. Lung Cancer 2006, 54:177-184.