Should perioperative supplemental oxygen be routinely recommended for surgery patients? a bayesian meta-analysis

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 256, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 894-901

  Kao, Lillian S ^a   Millas, Stefanos G ^a   Pedroza, Claudia ^a   Tyson, Jon E ^a   Lally, Kevin P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayes theorem; hyperoxia; meta analysis; perioperative care; surgical site infection

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COLORECTAL SURGERY; EMBASE; HUMAN; HYPEROXIA; MEDLINE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXYGEN SUPPLY; OXYGEN THERAPY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK REDUCTION; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL RISK;

BAYES THEOREM; HUMANS; OXYGEN; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 84870045762     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826cc8da     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Hopf HW, Hunt TK, West JM, et al. Wound tissue oxygen tension predicts the risk of wound infection in surgical patients. Arch Surg. 1997;132:997-1004; discussion 1005.
2. Allen DB, Maguire JJ, Mahdavian M, et al. Wound hypoxia and acidosis limit neutrophil bacterial killing mechanisms. Arch Surg. 1997;132:991-996.
3. Qadan M, Battista C, Gardner SA, et al. Oxygen and surgical site infection: a study of underlying immunologic mechanisms. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:369-377.
4. Greif R, Akca O, Horn EP, et al. Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:161-167.
5. Belda FJ, Aguilera L, Garcia de la Asuncion J, et al. Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294:2035-2042.
6. Pryor KO, Fahey TJ III, Lien CA, et al. Surgical site infection and the routine use of perioperative hyperoxia in a general surgical population: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:79-87.
7. Mayzler O, Weksler N, Domchik S, et al. Does supplemental perioperative oxygen administration reduce the incidence of wound infection in elective colorectal surgery? Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71:21-25.
8. Myles PS, Leslie K, Chan MT, et al. Avoidance of nitrous oxide for patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:221-231.
9. Meyhoff CS, Wetterslev J, Jorgensen LN, et al. Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: the PROXI randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2009;302:1543-1550.
10. Gardella C, Goltra LB, Laschansky E, et al. High-concentration supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of postcesarean surgical site infection: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:545-552.
11. Bickel A, Gurevits M, Vamos R, et al. Perioperative hyperoxygenation and wound site infection following surgery for acute appendicitis: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2011;146:464-470.
12. Brar MS, Brar SS, Dixon E. Perioperative supplemental oxygen in colorectal patients: a meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2011;166:227-235.
13. Al-Niaimi A, Safdar N. Supplemental perioperative oxygen for reducing surgical site infection: a meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:360-365.
14. Qadan M, Akca O, Mahid SS, et al. Perioperative supplemental oxygen therapy and surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2009;144:359-366; discussion 66-67.
15. Chura JC, Boyd A, Argenta PA. Surgical site infections and supplemental perioperative oxygen in colorectal surgery patients: a systematic review. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007;8:455-461.
16. Anthony T, Murray BW, Sum-Ping JT, et al. Evaluating an evidence-based bundle for preventing surgical site infection: a randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2011;146:263-269.
17. Wijeysundera DN, Austin PC, Hux JE, et al. Bayesian statistical inference enhances the interpretation of contemporary randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:13-21.e5.
18. Speigelhalter DJ, Abrams KR, Myles JP. Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health Care Evaluation. Chicester: Wiley; 2004.
19. Berry DA. Bayesian clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:27-36.
20. Diamond GA, Kaul S. Bayesian classification of clinical practice guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1431-1435.
21. Berry SM, Ishak KJ, Luce BR, et al. Bayesian meta-analyses for comparative effectiveness and informing coverage decisions. Med Care. 2010;48: S137-S144.
22. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2009.
23. Smith TC, Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A. Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study. Stat Med. 1995;14:2685-2699.
24. Jadad A. Randomised Controlled Trials: A User's Guide. London: BMJ Books; 1998.
25. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009;172:137-159.
26. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009;144:961-969.
27. Murray BW, Huerta S, Dineen S, et al. Surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: a review of the nonpharmacologic tools of prevention. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:812-822.
28. Kahn S, Gatt M, Horgan A, et al. Guidelines for Implementation of Enhanced Recovery Protocols (Issues in Professional Practice). London: Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; 2009.
29. Orhan-Sungur M, Kranke P, Sessler D, et al. Does supplemental oxygen reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1733-1738.
30. Pocock SJ. When to stop a clinical trial. BMJ. 1992;305:235-240.
31. Bassler D, Briel M, Montori VM, et al. Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA. 2010;303:1180-1187.
32. Bassler D, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Briel M, et al. Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:869-873.
33. Montori VM, Devereaux PJ, Adhikari NK, et al. Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;294:2203-2209.
34. Saugstad OD, Ramji S, Soll RF, et al. Resuscitation of newborn infants with 21% or 100% oxygen: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Neona-tology. 2008;94:176-182.
35. Kilgannon JH, Jones AE, Parrillo JE, et al. Relationship between supranormal oxygen tension and outcome after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2011;123:2717-2722.
36. Wehrwein EA, Basu R, Basu A, et al. Hyperoxia blunts counterregulation during hypoglycaemia in humans: possible role for the carotid bodies? J Physiol. 2010;588:4593-4601.
37. Anderson KJ, Harten JM, Booth MG, et al. The cardiovascular effects of normobaric hyperoxia in patients with heart rate fixed by permanent pacemaker. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:167-171.
38. Harten JM, Anderson KJ, Angerson WJ, et al. The effect of normobaric hy-peroxia on cardiac index in healthy awake volunteers. Anaesthesia. 2003;58:885-888.
39. Christensen R. Testing Fisher, Neyman, Pearson, and Bayes. Am Stat. 2005;59:121-126.