Long-term outcomes of the australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: The australasian laparoscopic colon cancer study trial

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 256, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 915-919

  Bagshaw, Philip F ^a   Allardyce, Randall A ^a   Frampton, Christopher M ^a   Frizelle, Francis A ^a   Hewett, Peter J ^c   McMurrick, Paul J ^d   Rieger, Nicholas A ^c   Smith, J Shona ^b   Solomon, Michael J ^e   Stevenson, Andrew R L ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b Academy of Endosurgery   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^d CABRINI HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

clinical trial; colon cancer; colon surgery; laparoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; COLON CANCER; COLON RESECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED COLON RESECTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEW ZEALAND; OPEN COLON RESECTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; AUSTRALIA; COLECTOMY; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEW ZEALAND; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84870041469     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182765ff8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, et al. CONCORD Working Group. Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:730-756.
2. Ministry of Health. Mortality and Demographic Data 2006. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2009. Available at: http://www.moh.govt.nz. Accessed May 25, 2011.
3. Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, et al. Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg. 2008;248:728-738.
4. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050-2059.
5. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:655-662.
6. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477-484.
7. Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:44-52.
8. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3061-3068.
9. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopic assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1638-1645.
10. Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, et al. Australian and New Zealand study comparing laparoscopic and open surgeries for colon cancer in adults: organization and conduct. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:840-847.
11. Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, et al. The Australasian laparoscopic colon cancer study. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:832-833.
12. Keats AS. The ASA classification of physical status-a recapitulation. Anes-thesiology. 1978;49:233-236.
13. Ellenberg SS, Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Data Monitoring Committees in Clinical Trials: A Practical Perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2003.
14. Stewart RJ, Robson RA, Stewart AW, et al. Cancer of the large bowel in a defined population: Canterbury New Zealand 1970-74. Br J Surg. 1979;66:309-314.
15. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, Maintenance and Support Services Organisations. Copyright @ 2011 Northrop Grumman Corporation. Available at: http://www.meddramsso.com. Accessed May 25, 2011.
16. Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1180-1186.
17. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:2217-2223.
18. Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2008;34:498-504.
19. Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, et al. Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142:298-303.
20. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colec-tomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224-2229.
21. Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, et al. The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248:1-7.
22. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Nelson H, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg. 2008;143:832-839.