Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial

Lancet

Volumn 359, Issue 9325, 2002, Pages 2224-2229

  Lacy, Antonio M ^a   García Valdecasas, Juan C ^a   Delgado, Salvadora ^a   Castells, Antoni ^a   Taurá, Pilar ^a   Piqué, Josep M ^a   Visa, Josep ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON ADENOCARCINOMA; COLON RESECTION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; PERISTALSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 0037193831     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Colorectal cancer prevention and treatment
2. Laparoscopic surgery
3. Postoperative complications of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy
4. A prospective, randomised trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: A preliminary report
5. Laparoscopic resection does not adversely affect early survival curves in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma
6. Laparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancer: Long term follow up
7. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy
8. Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection: Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry
9. Short-term outcome analysis of a randomised study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer
10. Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy: A randomised trial
11. Regression models and life tables
12. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy)
13. Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: Matched-control study
14. Laparoscopic surgery for the cure of colorectal cancer: Results of a German five-centre study
15. Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group
16. Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: Five year audit
17. Laparoscopy in 533 patients with abdominal malignancy
18. The relationship of survival to staging and grading of colorectal carcinoma: A prospective study of 503 cases
19. Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma
20. Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer
21. Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar after large-bowel cancer surgery
22. Altered helper and suppressor lymphocyte populations in surgical populations in surgical patients: A measure of postoperative immunosuppression
23. Surgical stress induces a shift in the type-1/type-2 T-helper cell balance, suggesting down regulation of cell mediated and up-regulation of antibody-mediated immunity commensurate to the trauma
24. Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response
25. Acute phase response in laparoscopic and conventional colectomy in colon cancer: A randomised study
26. The increase in immunosuppression and its role in the development of malignant lesions
27. Laparotomy and laparoscopy differentially accelerate experimental flank tumour growth
28. Laparoscopic surgery is associated with less tumour growth stimulation than conventional surgery: An experimental study
29. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open colectomy for colorectal cancer: Influence on neoplastic cell mobilization