The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 248, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-7

  Lacy, Antonio M ^a,b   Delgado, Salvadora ^a   Castells, Antoni ^a   Prins, Hubert A ^a   Arroyo, Vicente ^a   Ibarzabal, Ainitze ^a   Pique, Josep M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RELAPSE; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON ADENOCARCINOMA; COLON RESECTION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE FREE INTERVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY ASSISTED COLECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN COLECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK REDUCTION; ADENOCARCINOMA; COLON TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; IATROGENIC DISEASE; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLECTOMY; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM SEEDING; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 48949118967     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816a9d65     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Lacy AM, García -Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy- assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non -metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002; 359: 2224-2229.
2. The Clinical Outcome of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350: 2050-2059.
3. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365: 1718-1726.
4. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6: 477-484.
5. Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, et al. Laparoscopic resection does not adversely affect early survival curves in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1999;229:487-492.
6. Jacob BP, Salky B. Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:643-649.
7. Law WL, Lee YM, Chol HK, et al. Impact of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer on operative outcomes and survival. Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 1-7.
8. Whelan RL, Franklin M, Holubar SD, et al. Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colo- rectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc. 2003;17: 972-978.
9. Wichmann MW, Huttl TP, Winter H, et al. Effects of laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery, a prospective clinical study. Arch Surg. 2005; 140: 692-697.
10. Eggermont AM, Steller EP, Sugarbaker PH. Laparotomy enhances intraperitoneal tumour growth and abrogates the antitumour effects of interleukin-2 and lymphokine -activated killer cells. Surgery. 1997;102: 71-78.
11. Carter JJ, Feingold DL, Kirman I, et al. Laparoscopic- assisted cecec- tomy is associated with decreased formation of postoperative pulmonary metastases compared with open cecectomy in a murine model. Surgery. 2003;134: 432-436.
12. Allendorf JDF, Bessler M, Horvath KD, et al. Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs laparoscopic surgery in mice may be related to differences in postoperative T- cell function. Surg Endosc. 1999;13: 223-235.
13. Kirman I, Cekic V, Poltaraskaia N, et al. Open surgery induces a dramatic decrease in circulating intact IGFBP-3 in patients with colorectal cancer not seen with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005;19: 55-59.
14. Kirman I, Cekic V, Poltaraskaia M, et al. Plasma from patients undergoing major open surgery stimulates in vitro tumor growth: lower insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 levels may, in part, account for this change. Surgery. 2002;132: 186 -192.
15. Delgado S, Lacy AM, Filella X, et al. Acute phase response in laparo- scopic and conventional colectomy in colon cancer. A randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44: 638-646.
16. Wu FPK, Sietses C, von Blomberg BME, et al. Systemic and peritoneal inflammatory responses after laparoscopic or conventional colon resection in cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:147-155.
17. Leung KL, Lai PBS, Ho RLK, et al. Systemic cytokines response after laparoscopic assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2000;231: 506-511.
18. Pera M, Nelson H, Rajkumar SV, et al. Influence of postoperative acute-phase response on angiogenesis and tumor growth: open vs. laparoscopic -assisted surgery in mice. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7: 783-790.
19. Belizon A, Balik E, Feingold DL, et al. Major abdominal surgery increases plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor: open more so than minimally invasive methods. Ann Surg. 2006;244: 792-798.
20. Chen W, Ouyang XN, Lin QC. Study on the relationship between vascular endothelial growth factor and syndrome type of traditional Chinese medicine in patients with gastric carcinoma. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2007;27:127-130.
21. Kabbinavar FF, Hambleton J, Man RD, et al. Combined analysis of efficacy: the addition of bevacizumab to fluorouracil/ leucovorin improves survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3706-3712.
22. Weitz J, Jienle P, Lacroix J, et al. Dissemination of tumour cells in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:343-348.
23. Sales JP, Wind P, Douard R, et al. Blood dissemination of colonic epithelial cells during non-touch surgery for rectosigmoid cancer. Lancet. 1999;354:392.
24. Hayashi N, Egami Hi, Kai M, et al. Non-touch isolation technique reduces intraoperative shedding of tumour cells into portal vein during resection of colorectal cancer. Surgery. 1999;125:369 -374.
25. Bessa Z, Castells A, Lacy AM, et al. Laparoscopic -assisted vs. open colectomy for colorectal cancer: influence on neoplastic cell mobilization. J Gastointest Surg. 2001;5:66-73.
26. Patel HB, Nasir FA, Nash GF, et al. Enhanced angiogenesis following allogeneic blood transfusion. Clin Lab Haematol. 2004;26:129 -135.
27. 2-pneumoperitoneum and laparotomy on splenic and hepatic natural killer activity in a rate model. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:255-260.
28. Tartter PI, Steinberg B, Barron D, et al. The prognostic significance of natural killer cytotoxicity in patients with colorectal cancer. Arch Surg. 1987;122:1264-1268.
29. Porter GA, Soskolne CL, Yakimets WW, et al. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;227:157-167.
30. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117-2127.
31. Kuhry E, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, et al. COLOR Study Group. Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:687-692.