Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-Year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 25, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 3061-3068

  Jayne, David G ^a   Guillou, Pierre J ^a   Thorpe, Helen ^a   Quirke, Philip ^a   Copeland, Joanne ^a   Smith, Adrian M H ^a   Heath, Richard M ^a   Brown, Julia M ^a  

^a ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; BLADDER FUNCTION; BODY IMAGE; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICTURITION DISORDER; MULTICENTER STUDY; NERVE INJURY; OPEN STUDY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PARALLEL DESIGN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM CANCER; RECURRENCE RISK; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ROBOTICS; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNITED KINGDOM; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CARCINOMA; CAUSE OF DEATH; COLECTOMY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROBABILITY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34547695782     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Nelson H, Weeks JC, Wieand HS: Proposed phase III trial comparing laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 19:51-56, 1995
2. Stead ML, Brown JL, Bosanquet N, et al: Assessing the relative costs of standard open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer in a randomized controlled trial in the United Kingdom. Crit Rev Oncol Haematol 33:99-103, 2000
3. Hazebroek EJ: COLOR: A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 16:949-953, 2002
4. Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al: Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: A randomized trial. JAMA 287:321-328, 2002
5. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al: Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718-1726, 2005
6. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al: Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: Short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477-484, 2005
7. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ: Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111-1124, 2004
8. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365-376, 1993
9. Sprangers MAG, te Velde A, Aaronson NK: The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). Eur J Cancer 35:238-247, 1999
10. Dahlberg M, Glimelius B, Pahlman L: Changing strategy for rectal cancer is associated with improved outcome. Br J Surg 86:379-384, 1999
11. McCall JL, Cox MR, Wattchow DA: Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:126-132, 1995
12. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SCW, et al: Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: Prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187-1192, 2004
13. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al: Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224-2229, 2002
14. The COST Study Group: A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050-2059, 2004
15. Wexner SD, Cohen SM: Port metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 82:295-298, 1995
16. Curet MJ: Port site metastases. Am J Surg 187:705-712, 2004
17. Tang CL, Eu KW, Tai BC, et al: Randomized clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:801-807, 2001
18. Schwnek W, Neudecker J, Bohm B, et al: Postoperative short-term course following laparoscopic or conventional resection of colorectal tumours. Minimal Invasive Chirurgie 11:112-118, 2002
19. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al: Laparoscopic vs open colectomy in cancer patients: Long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2217-2223, 2005
20. Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, etal: Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92:1124-1132, 2005
21. Pigazzi A, Ellenholm JD, Ballantyne GH, et al: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 10:1521-1525, 2006
22. Senagore AJ, Duepree MD, Delaney CP, et al: Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. A 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46:503-509, 2003
23. Kehlet H, Dahl JB: Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 362: 1921-1928, 2003