Factors affecting long-term survival after aortic valve replacement

Kardiologia Polska

Volumn 70, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1120-1129

  Orłowska Baranowska, Ewa ^a   Abramczuk, Elzbieta ^a   Grabowski, Maciej ^a   Zakrzewski, Dariusz ^a   Miłkowska, Małgorzata ^a   Galas, Anna ^a   Czerwińska, Katarzyna ^a   Hryniewiecki, Tomasz ^a   Baranowski, Rafał ^a   Piskorski, Jarosław ^b,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF CARDIOLOGY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZIELONA GÓRA   (Poland)

^c POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Long term follow up

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SEX DIFFERENCE;

EID: 84870038821     PISSN: 00229032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Astor BC, Kaczmarek RG, Hefflin B, Daley WR. Mortality after aortic valve replacement: results from a nationally representative database. Ann Thorac Surg, 2000; 70: 1939-1945. (Pubitemid 32015288)
2. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. The task force of the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2007; 28: 230-268.
3. Brown JM, O'Brien SM, Wu C et al. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2009; 137: 82-90.
4. Brown ML, Schaff HV, Lahr BD et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008; 135: 878-884.
5. Bhatti F, Grayson AD, Grotte G et al. The logistic EuroSCORE in cardiac surgery: how well does it predict operative risk? Heart, 2006; 92: 1817-1820. (Pubitemid 44851330)
6. Di Eusanio M, Fortuna D, De Palma R. et al. Aortic valve replacement: results and predictors of mortality from a contemporary series of 2256 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2011; 141: 940-947.
7. Chikwe J, Croft LB, Goldstone AB et al. Comparison of the results of aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 30% versus patients with ejection fraction > 30%. Am J Cardiol, 2009; 104: 1717-1721.
8. Florath I, Rosendahl UP, Mortasawi A et al. Current determinants of operative mortality in 1400 patients requiring aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorc Surg, 2003; 76: 75-83. (Pubitemid 36819720)
9. Hanayama N, Fazel S, Goldman BS et al. Contemporary trends in aortic valve surgery; a single centre 10 years clinical experience J Card Surg, 2004; 19: 552-558. (Pubitemid 39587419)
10. Brown ML, Schaff HV, Sarano ME et al. Is the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation model valid for estimating the operative risk of patients considered for percutaneous aortic valve replacement? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008; 136: 566-571.
11. Kvidal P, Bergstrom R, Horte LG et al. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35: 747-756. (Pubitemid 30167033)
12. Doenst T. Sex-specific long-term outcomes after combined valve and coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006; 81: 1632-1636. (Pubitemid 350030005)
13. Roedler S, Neuhauser J, Sodeck G et al. Gender-related differences in patients undergoing mechanical aortic valve replacement with the CarboMedics valve. J Cardiovasc Surg, 2011; 52: 887-894.
14. Saxena A, Poh CL, Dinh DT et al. Does patient gender affect outcomes after concomitant coronary artery bypass graft and aortic valve replacement? An Australian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Database study. Cardiology, 2011; 119: 116-123.
15. Vaccariano V, Abramson JL, Veledar E, Weintraub WS. Sex differences in hospital mortality after coroanry artery bypass surgery: evidence for higher mortality in younger women. Circulation, 2002; 105: 1176-1181. (Pubitemid 34225817)
16. Tjang YS, Hees Y, Korfer R et al. Predictor of mortality after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2007; 32: 469-474. (Pubitemid 47223739)
17. Florath I, Albert A, Boening A et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: indentification of high-risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2010; 37: 1304-1310.
18. Pereira J, Lauer MS, Bashir M et al Survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39: 1356-1363. (Pubitemid 34297877)
19. Kadem L, Dumesnil JG, Rieu R et al. Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis. Heart, 2005; 91: 354-361. (Pubitemid 40299219)
20. Weber A, Noureddine H, Englberger L et al. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
21. Ashikhmina EA, Schaff HV, Dearani JA et al. Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: determinants of late outcome. Circulation, 2011; 124: 1070-1078.
22. Waard GA, Jansen EK, Mulder M et al. Long term outcomes for isolated aortic valve replacement and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Neth Heart J, 2012; 20: 110-117.
23. Kesavan S, Iqbal A, Khan Y et al. Risk profile and outcomes of aortic valve replacement in octogenarians. Word J Cardiol, 2011; 3: 359-366.
24. Faggiano P, Frattini S, Zilioli V et al. Prevalence of comorbidities and associated cardiac diseases in patients with valve aortic stenosis. Potential implications for the decision-making process. Int J Cardiol. 2012; 159: 94-99.
25. Varadarajan P, Kapoor N, Bansal RC, Pai RG. Survival in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis is dramatically improved by aortic valve replacement: Results from a cohort of 277 patients aged > or = 80 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2006; 30: 722-727. (Pubitemid 44574533)
26. Vasques F, Messori A, Lucenteforte E, Biancari F. Immediate and late outcome of patients aged 80 years and older undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 48 studies. Am Heart J, 2012; 163: 477-485.
27. Malaisrie SC, McCarthy PM, McGee EC et al. Contemporary perioperative results of isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010; 89: 751-756.
28. Grossi EA, Schwartz CF, Yu PJ et al. High-risk aortic valve replacement: are the outcomes as bad as predicted? Ann Thorac Surg, 2008; 85: 102-106.
29. Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RL et al. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J, 2012 [Epub ahead of print].