Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis

Heart

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 354-361

  Kadem, L ^b,c   Dumesnil, J G ^b   Rieu, R ^c   Durand, L G ^d   Garcia, D ^d   Pibarot, Philippe ^a,b  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Lab de Biomec Cardiovasculaire   (France)

^d CLIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHENYLEPHRINE; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; AORTA PRESSURE; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA SUPRAVALVULAR STENOSIS; ARTERY RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ACTIVITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FLOW RATE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HYPERTENSION; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; SYSTOLE; THORACIC AORTA; ANIMAL; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HOSPITALIZATION; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

ANIMALS; AORTA, THORACIC; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; HYPERTENSION; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; PHENYLEPHRINE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SWINE; VASCULAR RESISTANCE; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 14244261986     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2003.030601     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Gorlin R, Gorlin SG. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. Am Heart. J 1951;41:1.
2. Roberts WC, Perloff JK, Costantino T. Severe valvular aortic stenosis in patients over 65 years of age: a clinicopathologic study. Am J Cardiol 1971;27:497-506.
3. Laskey WK, Kussmaul WG, Noordergraaf A. Valvular and systemic arterial hemodynamics in aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 1995;92:1473-8.
4. Chambers J. Can high blood pressure mask severe aortic stenosis? J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:277-8.
5. Razzolini R, Gerosa G, Leoni L, et al. Transaortic gradient is pressure-dependent in a pulsatile model of the circulation. J Heart Valve Dis 1999;8:279-83.
6. Antonini-Canterin F, Huang G, Cervesato E, et al. Symptomatic aortic stenosis: does systemic hypertension play an additional role? Hypertension 2003;41:1268-72.
7. Xu J, Durand LG, Pibarot P. A new, simple, and accurate method for noninvasive estimation of pulmonary arterial pressure. Heart 2002;88:76-80.
8. Smith MD, Dawson PL, Elion JL, et al. Correlation of continuous wave Doppler velocities with cardiac catheterization gradients: an experimental model of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;6:1306-14.
9. Kadem L, Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, et al. Independent contribution of the left ventricular ejection time to the mean gradient in aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 2002;11:615-23.
10. Dumesnil JG, Yoganathan AP. Theoretical and practical differences between the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation for calculating aortic and mitral valve areas. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:1268-72.
11. Chemla D, Hébert J-L, Coirault C, et al. Total arterial compliance estimated by stroke volume-to-aortic pulse pressure ratio in humans. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol) 1998;274:H500-5.
12. Segers P, Verdonck P, Deryck Y, et al. Pulse pressure method and the area method for the estimation of total arterial compliance in dogs: sensitivity to wave reflection intensity. Ann Biomed Eng 1999;27:480-5.
13. De Simone G, Roman MJ, Koren MJ, et al. Stroke volume/pulse pressure ratio and cardiovascular risk in arterial hypertension. Hypertension 1999;33:800-5.
14. Palmieri V, Bella JN, Roman MJ, et al. Pulse pressure/stroke index and left ventricular geometry and function: the LIFE study. J Hypertens 2003;21:781-7.
15. Nichols W, O'Rourke MF. Input impedance as ventricular load. In: Nichols W, O'Rourke MF, eds. McDonald blood flow in file arteries. theoretical, experimental and clinical principles. London: Arnold, 1998:285-93.
16. Sunagawa K, Maughan WL, Burkhoff D, et al. Left ventricular interaction with arterial load studied in isolated canine ventricle. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol) 1983;245:H773-80.
17. Sunagawa K, Sogawa K, Maughan WL. Ventricular interaction with the loading system. Ann Biomed Eng 1984;12:163-89.
18. Segers P, Stergiopulos N, Westerhof N. Relation of effective arterial elastance to arterial system properties. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol) 2002;282:H1041-6.
19. Chemla D, Antony I, Lecarpentier Y, et al. Contribution of systemic vascular resistance and total arterial compliance to effective arterial elastance in humans. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol) 2003;285:H614-20.
20. Grossman W, Jones D, McLaurin LP. Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. J Clin Invest 1975;56:56-64.
21. Garcia D, Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, et al. Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: a new index based on the energy loss concept. Circulation 2000;101:765-71.
22. Garcia D, Dumesnil JG, Durand LG, et al. Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:435-42.
23. Thubrikar M, Bosher LP, Nolan SP. The mechanism of opening of the aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979;77:863-70.
24. Higashidate M, Tamiya K, Beppu T, et al. Regulation of the aortic valve opening: in vitro dynamic measurement of aortic valve orifice area. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:496-503.
25. Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G, et al. Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound: role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation 1996;94:1934-40.
26. Baumgartner H, Steffenelli T, Niederberger J, et al. " Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1655-61.
27. Heinrich RS, Marcus RH, Ensley AE, et al. Valve orifice area alone is an insufficient index of aortic stenosis severity: effects of the proximal and distal geometry on transaortic energy loss. J Heart Valve Dis 1999;8:509-15.
28. Schöbel WA, Voelker W, Haase KK, et al. Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 1999;20:1355-63.
29. Khot UN, Novaro GM, Popavic ZB, et al. Nitroprusside in critically ill patients with left ventricular dysfunction and aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1756-63.
30. Airaksinen KE, Salmela PI, Linnaluoto MK, et al. Diminished arterial elasticity in diabetes: association with fluorescent advanced glycosylation end products in collagen. Cardiovasc Res 1993;27:942-5.
31. Toto-Moukouo JJ, Achimastos A, Asmar RG, et al. Pulse wave velocity in patients with obesity and hypertension. Am Heart J 1986;112:136-40.
32. Sutton-Tyrrell K, Newman A, Simonsick EM, et al. Aortic stiffness is associated with visceral adiposity in older adults enrolled in the study of health, aging, and body composition. Hypertension 2001;38:429-33.
33. O'Rourke MF, Stoessen JA. Clinical applications of arterial stiffness: definitions and references values. Am J Hypertens 2002;15:426-44.