Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: Determinants of late outcome

Circulation

Volumn 124, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1070-1078

  Ashikhmina, Elena A ^a,b   Schaff, Hartzell V ^a   Dearani, Joseph A ^a   Sundt, Thoralf M ^a   Suri, Rakesh M ^a   Park, Soon J ^a   Burkhart, Harold M ^a   Li, Zhuo ^a   Daly, Richard C ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

aorta; risk factors; survival; valves

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMMUNE DEFICIENCY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION; OVERALL SURVIVAL; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STROKE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; MALE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STROKE; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80052304230     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.987560     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kolh P, Lahaye L, Gerard P, Limet R. Aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians: perioperative outcome and clinical follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16:68-73. (Pubitemid 29336436)
2. Melby SJ, Zierer A, Kaiser SP, Guthrie TJ, Keune JD, Schuessler RB, Pasque MK, Lawton JS, Moazami N, Moon MR, Damiano RJ Jr. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: risk factors for early and late mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1651-1656.
3. Van Geldorp MW, Eric Jamieson WR, Kappetein AP, Ye J, Fradet GJ, Eijkemans MJ, Grunkemeier GL, Bogers AJ, Takkenberg JJ. Patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical or biological prosthesis: weighing lifetime anticoagulant-related event risk against reoperation risk. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:881-886, 886e1-886e5.
4. De Vincentiis C, Kunkl AB, Trimarchi S, Gagliardotto P, Frigiola A, Menicanti L, Di Donato M. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: is biologic valve the unique solution? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1296-1301. (Pubitemid 351384796)
5. Birkmeyer NJ, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, Grunkemeier GL, Marrin CA, O'Connor GT. Prosthetic valve type for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: a decision analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70: 1946-1952. (Pubitemid 32015289)
6. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons [errata appears in Circulation. 2010;121:e443; Circulation. 2007;115: e409]. Circulation. 2006;114:e84-e231. (Pubitemid 44268973)
7. Vicchio M, Della Corte A, De Santo LS, De Feo M, Caianiello G, Scardone M, Cotrufo M. Tissue versus mechanical prostheses: quality of life in octogenarians. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1290-1295. (Pubitemid 351381683)
8. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise J, Solomon S, Spencer KT, St John Sutton M, Stewart W. American Society of Echocardiography's Nomenclature and Standards Committee; Task Force on Chamber Quantification; American College of Cardiology Echocardiography Committee; American Heart Association; European Association of Echocardiography; European Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006;7:79-108. (Pubitemid 43257193)
9. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, Iung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quinones M. American Society of Echocardiography; European Association of Echocardiography. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice [erratum appears in J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009; 22:442]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:1-23.
10. Davis EA, Greene PS, Cameron DE, Gott VI, Laschinger JC, Stuart RS, Sussman MS, Watkins L, Baumgartner WA. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly. Circulation. 1996;94(suppl):II-121-II-125. (Pubitemid 26363377)
11. Kawachi Y, Arinaga K, Nakashima A, Toshima Y, Kawano H, Kosuga T. Aortic valve replacement in patients age 70 years and older: early and late results. Artif Organs. 2002;26:706-710. (Pubitemid 34985099)
12. Milano A, Guglielmi C, De Carlo M, Di Gregorio O, Borzoni G, Verunelli F, Bortolotti U. Valve-related complications in elderly patients with biological and mechanical aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 66(suppl):S82-S87. (Pubitemid 29087136)
13. Ninet J, Tronc F, Robin J, Curtil A, Aleksic I, Champsaur G. Mechanical versus biological isolated aortic valvular replacement after the age of 70: equivalent long-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;13:84-89. (Pubitemid 28114091)
14. McClure RS, Narayanasamy N, Wiegerinck E, Lipsitz S, Maloney A, Byrne JG, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Cohn LH. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89: 1410-1416.
15. Chiappini B, Camurri N, Loforte A, Di Marco L, Di Bartolomeo R, Marinelli G. Outcome after aortic valve replacement in octogenarians. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:85-89. (Pubitemid 38833905)
16. Filsoufi F, Rahmanian PB, Castillo JG, Chikwe J, Silvay G, Adams DH. Excellent early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement in people aged 80 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:255-261. (Pubitemid 351160685)
17. Akins CW, Hilgenberg AD, Vlahakes GJ, MacGillivray TE, Torchiana DF, Madsen JC. Results of bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement performed with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:1098-1106. (Pubitemid 35176726)
18. Silberman S, Oren A, Dotan M, Merin O, Fink D, Deeb M, Bitran D. Aortic valve replacement: choice between mechanical valves and bioprostheses. J Card Surg. 2008;23:299-306. (Pubitemid 351852562)
19. Accola KD, Scott ML, Palmer GJ, Thompson PA, Sand ME, Suarez-Cavalier JE, Bott JN, Ebra G. Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: a retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2008;17: 355-364.
20. Varadarajan P, Kapoor N, Bansal RC, Pai RG. Survival in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis is dramatically improved by aortic valve replacement: results from a cohort of 277 patients aged or 80 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30:722-727. (Pubitemid 44574533)
21. Cohn LH, Narayanasamy N. Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: what are the limits? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007;22:92-95. (Pubitemid 46220262)
22. Peterseim DS, Cen YY, Cheruvu S, Landolfo K, Bashore TM, Lowe JE, Wolfe WG, Glower DD. Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:890-897. (Pubitemid 29210771)
23. Brown ML, Schaff HV, Lahr BD, Mullany CJ, Sundt TM, Dearani JA, McGregor CG, Orszulak TA. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:878-884.
24. Lund O, Bland M. Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:20-26.
25. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1152-1158.
26. Holper K, Wottke M, Lewe T, Baumer L, Meisner H, Paek SU, Sebening F. Bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the elderly: benefits and risks. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60(suppl):S443-S446.
27. Kobayashi Y, Eishi K, Nagata S, Nakano K, Sasako Y, Kobayashi J, Kosakai Y, Miyatake K. Choice of replacement valve in the elderly. J Heart Valve Dis. 1997;6:404-409. (Pubitemid 27323891)
28. Helft G, Tabone X, Georges JL, Lomama E, Lepailleur C, Le Feuvre C, Metzger JP, Heulin A, Vacheron A. Late results with bioprosthetic valves in the elderly. J Card Surg. 1999;14:252-258. (Pubitemid 30418435)