Pharmacy workers' perceptions and acceptance of bar-coded medication technology in a pediatric hospital

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 509-522

  Holden, Richard J ^a,b   Brown, Roger L ^c   Scanlon, Matthew C ^d   Karsh, Ben Tzion ^c,e  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^e University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

Bar coded medication dispensing and administration systems; BCMA; Pediatric hospital; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL PHARMACY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICATION ERROR; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCEPTION; PHARMACIST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES; WORKFLOW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; CLINICAL PHARMACY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HOSPITALS, PEDIATRIC; HUMANS; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MEDICATION ERRORS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCEPTION; PHARMACISTS; PHARMACISTS' AIDES; PHARMACY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; WISCONSIN; WORKFLOW; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84869885128     PISSN: 15517411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Preventing Medication Errors 2007, Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
2. Bates D.W., Cullen D.J., Laird N., et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events-implications for prevention. JAMA 1995, 274:29-34.
3. Karsh B., Wetterneck T., Holden R.J., et al. Bar-coding in medication administration. Handbook of Healthcare Delivery Systems 2011, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 47-1 to 47-17. Y. Yih (Ed.).
4. Oren E., Shaffer E.R., Guglielmo B.J. Impact of emerging technologies on medication errors and adverse drug events. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003, 60:1447-1458.
5. Poon E.G., Keohane C.A., Yoon C.S., et al. Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1698-1707.
6. Poon E.G., Cina J.L., Churchill W., et al. Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar-code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med 2006, 145:426-434.
7. Nanji K.C., Cina J., Patel N., Churchill W., Gandhi T.K., Poon E.G. Overcoming barriers to the implementation of a pharmacy bar-code scanning system for medication dispensing: a case study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009, 16:645-650.
8. Koppel R., Wetterneck T.B., Telles J.L., Karsh B. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008, 15:408-423.
9. Miller D.F., Fortier C.R., Garrison K.L. Bar-code medication administration technology: characterization of high-alert medication triggers and clinician workarounds. Ann Pharmacother 2010, 45:162-168.
10. Holden R.J., Karsh B. A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety. Behav Inf Technol 2009, 28:21-38.
11. Holden R.J., Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010, 43:159-172.
12. Holden R.J., Brown R.L., Alper S.J., Scanlon M.C., Patel N.R., Karsh B. That's nice, but what does IT do? Evaluating the impact of bar-coded medication administration by measuring changes in the process of care. Int J Ind Ergon 2011, 41:370-379.
13. Hurley A.C., Bane A., Fotakis S., et al. Nurses' satisfaction with medication administration point-of-care technology. J Nurs Adm 2007, 37:343-349.
14. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989, 13:319-339.
15. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 2000, 46:186-204.
16. Venkatesh V., Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci 2008, 39:273-315.
17. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 2003, 27:425-478.
18. DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manage Info Syst 2003, 19(4):9-30.
19. Wixom B.H., Todd P.A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf Syst Res 2005, 16:85-102.
20. Brown S.A., Massey A.P., Montoya-Weiss M.M., Burkman J.R. Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. Eur J Inf Syst 2002, 11:283-295.
21. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991, 50:179-211.
22. Holden R.J., Patel N.R., Scanlon M.C., Shalaby T.M., Arnold J.M., Karsh B. Effects of mental demands during dispensing on perceived medication safety and employee well being: a study of workload in pediatric hospital pharmacies. Res Social Adm Pharm 2010, 6:293-306.
23. Venkatesh V., Speier C., Morris M.G. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model. Decis Sci 2002, 33(2):297-316.
24. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Ackerman P.L. A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2000, 83:33-60.
25. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q 2000, 24:115-139.
26. McDonald R.A., Behson S.J., Seifert C.F. Strategies for dealing with measurement error in multiple regression. J Acad Bus Econ 2005, 5:80-97.
27. Hayduk L.A. Structural Equations Modeling with LISREL 1987, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
28. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics 1989, Harper & Row, Cambridge, MA. 2nd ed.
29. Bandalos D.L. The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Struct Equation Model 2002, 9:78-102.
30. Bandalos D.L., Finney S.J. Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation 2001, 269-296. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahawah, NJ. G.A. Marcoulides, R.E. Schumacker (Eds.).
31. Patterson E.S., Rogers M.L., Render M.L. Fifteen best practice recommendations for bar-code medication administration in the veterans health administration. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004, 30:355-365.
32. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Foundation. Implementing a Bar-coded Medication Safety Program, 2004.
33. Hook J., Pearlstein J., Samarth A., Cusack C. Using Barcode Medication Administration to Improve Quality and Safety: Findings from the AHRQ Health IT Portfolio 2008, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, AHRQ Publication No. 09-0023-EF.
34. Patchett J.A. Bar-Coding: A Practical Approach to Improving Medication Safety 2004, ASHP Advantage, Bethesda, MD.
35. Holden RJ, Alper SJ, Scanlon MC, Murkowski K, Rivera AJ, Karsh B. Challenges and problem-solving strategies during medication management: a study of a pediatric hospital before and after bar-coding. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Healthcare Systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety; 2008; Strasbourg, France.
36. Stead W.W. Rethinking electronic health records to better achieve quality and safety goals. Annu Rev Med 2007, 58:35-47.
37. Carayon P., Wetterneck T.B., Hundt A.S., et al. Evaluation of nurse interaction with bar-code medication administration technology in the work environment. J Patient Saf 2007, 3:34-42.
38. Patterson E.S., Cook R.I., Render M.L. Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar-coding in medication administration. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002, 9:540-553.
39. Karsh B., Weinger M.B., Abbott P.A., Wears R.L. Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010, 17:617-623.
40. Holden R.J. Physicians' beliefs about using EMR and CPOE: in pursuit of a contextualized understanding of health IT use behavior. Int J Med Inform 2010, 79:71-80.
41. Holden RJ. Social and personal normative influences on healthcare professionals to use information technology: towards a more robust social ergonomics. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2011, in press: doi:10.1080/1463922X.2010.549249.
42. Goodhue D.L., Thompson R.L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q 1995, 19:213-236.
43. Petter S., DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur J Inf Syst 2008, 17:236-263.
44. Lapointe L., Rivard S. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Q 2005, 29:461-491.
45. Lapointe L., Rivard S. Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. CMAJ 2006, 174:1573-1578.
46. Simon S.R., Soran C.S., Kaushal R., et al. Physicians' use of key functions in electronic health records from 2005 to 2007: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009, 16:465-470.
47. Timmons S. Nurses resisting information technology. Nurs Inq 2003, 10:257-269.
48. Spil T.A.M., Schuring R.W., Michel-Verkerke M.B. Electronic prescription system: do the professionals use it?. Int J Healthc Technol Manag 2004, 6:32-55.
49. Sittig D.F., Wright A., Osheroff J.A., et al. Grand challenges in clinical decision support. J Biomed Inform 2008, 41:387-392.
50. Aarts J., Doorewaard H., Berg M. Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004, 11:207-216.
51. Leviss J. H.I.T. or Miss: Lessons Learned from Health Information Technology Implementations 2010, AHIMA Press, Chicago, IL.
52. King W.R., He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manage 2006, 43:740-755.
53. Legris P., Ingham J., Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manage 2003, 40:191-204.
54. Yousafzai S.Y., Foxall G.R., Pallister J.G. Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: part 2. J Model Manag 2007, 2:281-304.
55. Yousafzai S.Y., Foxall G.R., Pallister J.G. Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: part 1. J Model Manag 2007, 2:251-280.
56. Lee Y., Kozar K.A., Larsen K.R.T. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun Am Inform Soc 2003, 12:752-780.
57. Ma Q., Liu L. The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings. J Organizational End User Comput 2004, 16:59-72.
58. Hu P.J.H., Chau P.Y.K. Physician acceptance of telemedicine technology: an empirical investigation. Top Health Inf Manag 1999, 19:20-35.