Remote ischemic conditioning: The cardiologist's perspective

Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 667-674

  Schmidt, Michael R ^a   Sloth, Astrid D ^a   Johnsen, Jacob ^a   Bøtker, Hans E ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

acute myocardial infarction; cardioprotection; ischemia reperfusion injury; ischemic preconditioning; primary coronary angioplasty; remote conditioning; stroke

Indexed keywords

ALTEPLASE;

CARDIOLOGIST; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HEART ARREST; HEART INFARCTION; HEART INFARCTION PREVENTION; HEART PROTECTION; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING; NONHUMAN; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; REMOTE ISCHEMIC CONDITIONING; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HEART ARREST; HUMANS; ISCHEMIC POSTCONDITIONING; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION INJURY; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; STROKE; TOURNIQUETS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84869880113     PISSN: 15582027     EISSN: 15582035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328357bff2     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997; 349:1498-1504.
2. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012; 125:188-197.
3. Terkelsen CJ, Jensen LO, Tilsted HH, et al. Health care system delay and heart failure in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: follow-up of population-based medical registry data. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155:361- 367.
4. Sorensen JT, Terkelsen CJ, Norgaard BL, et al. Urban and rural implementation of pre-hospital diagnosis and direct referral for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2011; 32:430-436.
5. Heusch G. Postconditioning: old wine in a new bottle? J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:1111-1112. (Pubitemid 39165148)
6. Ovize M, Baxter GF, Di Lisa F, et al. Postconditioning and protection from reperfusion injury: where do we stand? Position paper from the Working Group of Cellular Biology of the Heart of the European Society of Cardiology. Cardiovasc Res 2010; 87:406-423.
7. MurryCE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation 1986; 74:1124-1136. (Pubitemid 17174962)
8. Kharbanda RK, Mortensen UM, White PA, et al. Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo. Circulation 2002; 106:2881-2883. (Pubitemid 35424735)
9. Thielmann M, Kottenberg E, Boengler K, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass surgery with crystalloid cardioplegic arrest. Basic Res Cardiol 2010; 105:657-664.
10. Zimmerman RF, Ezeanuna PU, Kane JC, et al. Ischemic preconditioning at a remote site prevents acute kidney injury in patients following cardiac surgery. Kidney Int 2011; 80:861-867.
11. Kadkhodaee M, Seifi B, Najafi A, Sedaghat Z. First report of the protective effects of remote per- and postconditioning on ischemia/ reperfusioninduced renal injury. Transplantation 2011; 92:e55.
12. Konstantinov IE, Arab S, Kharbanda RK, et al. The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies inflammatory gene expression in humans. Physiol Genomics 2004; 19:143-150.
13. Konstantinov IE, Arab S, Li J, et al. The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies gene expression in mouse myocardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130:1326-1332. (Pubitemid 41543201)
14. Przyklenk K, Bauer B, Ovize M, Kloner RA, Whittaker P. Regional ischemic 'preconditioning' protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion. Circulation 1993; 87:893- 899. (Pubitemid 23070821)
15. Birnbaum Y, Hale SL, Kloner RA. Ischemic preconditioning at a distance: reduction of myocardial infarct size by partial reduction of blood supply combined with rapid stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle in the rabbit. Circulation 1997; 96:1641-1646. (Pubitemid 27375364)
16. Schmidt MR, Smerup M, Konstantinov IE, et al. Intermittent peripheral tissue ischemia during coronary ischemia reduces myocardial infarction through a KATP-dependent mechanism: first demonstration of remote ischemic perconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007; 292:H1883-H1890. (Pubitemid 46572412)
17. Hahn CD, Manlhiot C, Schmidt MR, Nielsen TT, Redington AN. Remote ischemic per-conditioning: a novel therapy for acute stroke? Stroke 2011; 42:2960-2962.
18. Lazaris AM, Maheras AN, Vasdekis SN, et al. Protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury, in a model of thoracoabdominal aorta approach. J Surg Res 2009; 154:267-273.
19. Kanoria S, Jalan R, Davies NA, et al. Remote ischaemic preconditioning of the hind limb reduces experimental liver warm ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Br J Surg 2006; 93:762-768. (Pubitemid 43886031)
20. Harkin DW, Barros D'Sa AA, McCallion K, Hoper M, Campbell FC. Ischemic preconditioning before lower limb ischemia-reperfusion protects against acute lung injury. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:1264-1273. (Pubitemid 44718533)
21. Kharbanda RK, Li J, Konstantinov IE, et al. Remote ischaemic preconditioning protects against cardiopulmonary bypass-induced tissue injury: a preclinical study. Heart 2006; 92:1506-1511. (Pubitemid 44578854)
22. Michelsen MM, Stottrup NB, Schmidt MR, et al. Exercise-induced cardioprotection is mediated by a bloodborne, transferable factor. Basic Res Cardiol 2012; 107:260.
23. Shimizu M, Tropak M, Diaz RJ, et al. Transient limb ischaemia remotely preconditions through a humoral mechanism acting directly on the myocardium: evidence suggesting cross-species protection. Clin Sci (Lond) 2009; 117:191-200.
24. Konstantinov IE, Li J, Cheung MM, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning of the recipient reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury of the denervated donor heart via a Katp channel-dependent mechanism. Transplantation 2005; 79:1691-1695. (Pubitemid 40885266)
25. Steensrud T, Li J, Dai X, et al. Pretreatment with the nitric oxide donor SNAP or nerve transection blocks humoral preconditioning by remote limb ischemia or intra-arterial adenosine. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2010; 299:H1598-H1603.
26. Lim SY, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. The neural and humoral pathways in remote limb ischemic preconditioning. Basic Res Cardiol 2010; 105:651-655.
27. Redington KL, Disenhouse T, Strantzas SC, et al. Remote cardioprotection by direct peripheral nerve stimulation and topical capsaicin is mediated by circulating humoral factors. Basic Res Cardiol 2012; 107:241.
28. Tamareille S, Mateus V, Ghaboura N, et al. RISK and SAFE signaling pathway interactions in remote limb ischemic perconditioning in combination with local ischemic postconditioning. Basic Res Cardiol 2011; 106:1329-1339.
29. Heusch G, Musiolik J, Kottenberg E, et al. STAT5 activation and cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning in humans. Circ Res 2012; 110:111-115.
30. Heusch G, Boengler K, Schulz R. Inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening: the Holy Grail of cardioprotection. Basic Res Cardiol 2010; 105:151-154.
31. Shimizu M, Saxena P, Konstantinov IE, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning decreases adhesion and selectively modifies functional responses of human neutrophils. J Surg Res 2010; 158:155- 161.
32. Kraemer R, Lorenzen J, Kabbani M, et al. Acute effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on cutaneous microcirculation - a controlled prospective cohort study. BMC Surg 2011; 11:32.
33. Jean-St-Michel E, Manlhiot C, Li J, et al. Remote preconditioning improves maximal performance in highly trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43:1280-1286.
34. Cheung MM, Kharbanda RK, Konstantinov IE, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:2277-2282. (Pubitemid 43795071)
35. Zhou W, Zeng D, Chen R, et al. Limb ischemic preconditioning reduces heart and lung injury after an open heart operation in infants. Pediatr Cardiol 2010; 31:22-29.
36. Hausenloy DJ, Mwamure PK, Venugopal V, et al. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 370:575-579. (Pubitemid 47247853)
37. Venugopal V, Hausenloy DJ, Ludman A, et al. Remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cold-blood cardioplegia: a randomised controlled trial. Heart 2009; 95:1567-1571.
38. Ali ZA, Callaghan CJ, Lim E, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial and renal injury after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2007; 116:I98-105.
39. Li L, Luo W, Huang L, et al. Remote perconditioning reduces myocardial injury in adult valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 2010; 164:e21-e26.
40. Venugopal V, Laing CM, Ludman A, Yellon DM, Hausenloy D. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on acute kidney injury in nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a secondary analysis of 2 small randomized trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 56:1043- 1049.
41. Walsh SR, Boyle JR, Tang TY, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning for renal and cardiac protection during endovascular aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial. J Endovasc Ther 2009; 16:680-689.
42. Kottenberg E, Thielmann M, Bergmann L, et al. Protection by remote ischemic preconditioning during coronary artery bypass graft surgery with isoflurane but not propofol - a clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56:30-38.
43. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010; 121:948-954.
44. Porto I, Blackman DJ, Nicolson D, et al. What is the incidence of myocardial necrosis in elective patients discharged on the same day following percutaneous coronary intervention? Heart 2004; 90:1489- 1490. (Pubitemid 39626339)
45. Selvanayagam JB, Cheng AS, Jerosch-Herold M, et al. Effect of distal embolization on myocardial perfusion reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention: a quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion study. Circulation 2007; 116:1458-1464. (Pubitemid 47480636)
46. Bahrmann P, Werner GS, Heusch G, et al. Detection of coronary microembolization by Doppler ultrasound in patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation 2007; 115:600-608. (Pubitemid 46226170)
47. Heusch G, Kleinbongard P, Bose D, et al. Coronary microembolization: from bedside to bench and back to bedside. Circulation 2009; 120:1822-1836.
48. Ramirez-Moreno A, Cardenal R, Pera C, et al. Predictors and prognostic value of myocardial injury following stent implantation. Int J Cardiol 2004; 97:193-198. (Pubitemid 39286835)
49. Nageh T, Sherwood RA, Harris BM, Thomas MR. Prognostic role of cardiac troponin I after percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary disease. Heart 2005; 91:1181-1185. (Pubitemid 41192395)
50. Hoole SP, Heck PM, Sharples L, et al. Cardiac Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Coronary Stenting (CRISP Stent) Study: a prospective, randomized control trial. Circulation 2009; 119:820-827.
51. Prasad A, Gossl M, Hoyt J, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning immediately before percutaneous coronary intervention does not impactmyocardial necrosis, inflammatory response and circulating endothelial progenitor cell counts. A single center randomized sham controlled trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012. [Epub ahead of print]
52. van 't Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, et al. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Circulation 1998; 97:2302-2306. (Pubitemid 28280383)
53. Svilaas T, Vlaar PJ, van der Horst IC, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:557-567. (Pubitemid 351214283)
54. Kaltoft A, Bottcher M, Sand NP, et al. Sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention identifies patients at risk for large infarcts. Am Heart J 2006;151:1108-1114.
55. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J, et al. Myocardial salvage after coronary stenting plus abciximab versus fibrinolysis plus abciximab in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359:920- 925. (Pubitemid 34246380)
56. Schomig A, Mehilli J, Antoniucci D, et al. Mechanical reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting more than 12 hours from symptom onset: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:2865- 2872. (Pubitemid 41029140)
57. Botker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, et al. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet 2010; 375:727-734.
58. Miller TD, Christian TF, Hopfenspirger MR, et al. Infarct size after acute myocardial infarction measured by quantitative tomographic 99mTc sestamibi imaging predicts subsequent mortality. Circulation 1995; 92:334-341.
59. Burns RJ, Gibbons RJ, Yi Q, et al. The relationships of left ventricular ejection fraction, end-systolic volume index and infarct size to six-month mortality after hospital discharge following myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:30-36. (Pubitemid 34059858)
60. Ndrepepa G, Mehilli J, Schwaiger M, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial salvage achieved by reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Nucl Med 2004; 45:725-729. (Pubitemid 47618548)
61. Kristensen J, Mortensen UM, Nielsen SS, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with 99mTc sestamibi early after reperfusion reliably reflects infarct size reduction by ischaemic preconditioning in an experimental porcine model. Nucl Med Commun 2004; 25:495-500. (Pubitemid 38591111)
62. Okada RD, Williams SJ, Glover DK, Dragatokis D. Cardiac imaging and myocardial kinetics of technetium-tertiary butyl-isonitrile during dipyridamole-induced hyperemia. Am Heart J 1988; 116:979- 988.
63. Carlsson M, Ubachs JF, Hedstrom E, et al. Myocardium at risk after acute infarction in humans on cardiac magnetic resonance: quantitative assessment during follow-up and validation with single-photon emission computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2:569-576.
64. Mewton N, Rapacchi S, Augeul L, et al. Determination of the myocardial area at risk with pre- versus post-reperfusion imaging techniques in the pig model. Basic Res Cardiol 2011; 106:1247-1257.
65. Munk K, Andersen NH, Schmidt MR, et al. Remote ischemic conditioning in patients with myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: impact on left ventricular function assessed by comprehensive echocardiography and gated single-photon emission CT. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3:656-662.
66. Rentoukas I, Giannopoulos G, Kaoukis A, et al. Cardioprotective role of remote ischemic periconditioning in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: enhancement by opioid action. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3:49-55.
67. Lonborg J, Kelbaek H, Vejlstrup N, et al. Cardioprotective effects of ischemic postconditioning in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, evaluated by magnetic resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3:34-41.
68. Tsang A, Hausenloy DJ, Mocanu MM, Carr RD, Yellon DM. Preconditioning the diabetic heart: the importance of Akt phosphorylation. Diabetes 2005; 54:2360-2364. (Pubitemid 41134263)
69. Kristiansen SB, Lofgren B, Stottrup NB, et al. Ischaemic preconditioning does not protect the heart in obese and lean animal models of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2004; 47:1716-1721. (Pubitemid 40022406)
70. Povlsen JA, Løfgren B, Rasmussen LE, et al. Cardioprotective effect of L-glutamate in obese type 2 diabetic Zucker fatty rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2009; 36:892-898.
71. Boengler K, Buechert A, Heinen Y, et al. Cardioprotection by ischemic postconditioning is lost in aged and STAT3-deficient mice. Circ Res 2008; 102:131-135.
72. Boengler K, Konietzka I, Buechert A, et al. Loss of ischemic preconditioning's cardioprotection in aged mouse hearts is associated with reduced gap junctional and mitochondrial levels of connexin 43. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007; 292:H1764-H1769. (Pubitemid 46572399)
73. Boengler K, Schulz R, Heusch G. Loss of cardioprotection with ageing. Cardiovasc Res 2009; 83:247-261.
74. McCormack L, Petrowsky H, Jochum W, et al. Use of severely steatotic grafts in liver transplantation: a matched case-control study. Ann Surg 2007; 246:940-946; discussion 946-948. (Pubitemid 350179176)
75. Hajjar K, Kerr DM, Lees KR. Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54:901-907.
76. Dave KR, Saul I, Prado R, Busto R, Perez-Pinzon MA. Remote organ ischemic preconditioning protect brain from ischemic damage following asphyxial cardiac arrest. Neurosci Lett 2006; 404:170-175. (Pubitemid 44041791)
77. Ren C, Gao X, Steinberg GK, Zhao H. Limb remote-preconditioning protects against focal ischemia in rats and contradicts the dogma of therapeutic time windows for preconditioning. Neuroscience 2008; 151:1099-1103.
78. Jensen HA, Loukogeorgakis S, Yannopoulos F, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning protects the brain against injury after hypothermic circulatory arrest. Circulation 2011; 123:714-721.
79. Koch S, Katsnelson M, Dong C, Perez-Pinzon M. Remote ischemic limb preconditioning after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a phase Ib study of safety and feasibility. Stroke 2011; 42:1387-1391.
80. Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. The second window of preconditioning (SWOP) where are we now? Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2010; 24:235-254.
81. Takano H, Tang XL, Kodani E, Bolli R. Late preconditioning enhances recovery of myocardial function after infarction in conscious rabbits. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000; 279:H2372-H2381.
82. Liu C, Dai R, Yu R, Xu J. Morphine preconditioning, cardioprotection and left ventricular remodelling in rabbits. Acta Cardiol 2011; 66:341-348.
83. Wei M, Xin P, Li S, et al. Repeated remote ischemic postconditioning protects against adverse left ventricular remodeling and improves survival in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Circ Res 2011; 108:1220-1225.
84. Loukogeorgakis S. Remote ischemic preconditioning protects against ischemia reperfusion injury in pediatric renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011 (in press).
85. Piot C, Croisille P, Staat P, et al. Effect of cyclosporine on reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:473-481.
86. Hong DM, Mint JJ, Kim JH, et al. The effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38:924-929.
87. Wagner R, Piler P, Bedanova H, et al. Myocardial injury is decreased by late remote ischaemic preconditioning and aggravated by tramadol in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 11:758-762.
88. Young PJ, Dalley P, Garden A, et al. A pilot study investigating the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in high-risk cardiac surgery using a randomised controlled double-blind protocol. Basic Res Cardiol 2012; 107:256.