New investigation on diagnosing steam production systems from multivariate time series applied to thermal power plants

Applied Energy

Volumn 101, Issue , 2013, Pages 589-599

  Blanco, J M ^a   Vazquez, L ^b   Pena F ^a   Diaz, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE ORIENTE   (Cuba)

Author keywords

Data processing; Diagnosis algorithms; Long term and short term response; Steady state detector; Steam generators; Thermal power plant regulation

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; ENERGY CONVERSION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; STEAM GENERATORS;

BASE-LOADS; DIAGNOSIS ALGORITHMS; DIAGNOSIS PROCEDURE; ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS; KEY VARIABLES; LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM RESPONSE; MULTIVARIATE TIME SERIES; REFERENCE POWER PLANT; REFERENCE VALUES; STEAM PRODUCTION; SYSTEM OPERATION MODES; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; TIME SEGMENTS;

THERMOELECTRIC POWER PLANTS;

ALGORITHM; ASSESSMENT METHOD; BUILDING; DATA ACQUISITION; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; ENERGY CONSERVATION; MEASUREMENT METHOD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY; POWER PLANT; STEADY-STATE EQUILIBRIUM; THERMAL POWER; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

EID: 84869862962     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.060     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Carvalho P.V.R., Dos Santos I.L., Borges M.R.S. Micro incident analysis framework to assess safety and resilience in the operation of safe critical systems: a case study in a nuclear power plant. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2008, 21:277-286.
2. Finn J., Wagner J., Bassily H. Monitoring strategies for a combined cycle electric power generator. Appl Energy 2010, 87(8):2621-2627.
3. Usón S., Valero A. Thermoeconomic diagnosis for improving the operation of energy intensive systems: comparison of methods. Appl Energy 2011, 88:699-711.
4. Smith D.J. Performance monitoring enhances power plant operations. Power Eng 1998, 20-25.
5. McGregor J.F. Data-based latent variable methods for process analysis, monitoring and control. Comput Aided Chem Eng 2004, 18:87-98.
6. Roskilly A.P., Wang Y. Sustainable thermal energy management in the process industries conference (SusTEM2010. Appl Energy 2012, 89:1-2. (special issue).
7. Krishnasamy L., Khan F., Haddara M. Development of a risk-based maintenance (RBM) strategy for a power-generating plant. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2005, 18:69-81.
8. Blanco J.M., Peña F. Increase in the boiler's performance in terms of the acid dew point temperature: environmental advantages of replacing fuels. Appl Therm Eng 2007, 28(7):777-784.
9. Ballester J., García A.T. Diagnostic techniques for the monitoring and control of practical flames. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2010, 36/4:375-411.
10. Uson S., Valero A., Correas L. Energy efficiency assessment and improvement in energy intensive systems through thermoeconomic diagnosis of the operation. Appl Energy 2010, 87(6):1989-1995.
11. Valero A., Lozano M.A., Bartolome J.L. On-line monitoring of power-plant performance, using energetic cost techniques. Appl Energy 1996, 16:933-948.
12. Verda V., Serra L., Valero A. The effects of the control system on the thermoeconomic diagnosis of a power plant. Energy 2004, 29:331-359.
13. Vazquez L, Sudriá A, Proske D, Llosas Y, Bergas J, Pelaez A. Educational recommendations to modernize electric power plants considering economy, technology and control. In: Proceedings of the IFAC symposium on power plants & power systems control, vol. 2. Seoul, Korea; 2003. p. 324-8.
14. Kusiak A., Li M., Tang F. Modelling and optimization of HVAC energy consumption. Appl Energy 2010, 87:3092-3102.
15. Barelli L., Barluzzi E., Bidini G. Modelling of a 1MW cogenerative internal combustion engine for diagnostic scopes. Appl Energy 2011, 88:2702-2712.
16. Mavropoulos G.C. Experimental study of the interactions between long and short-term unsteady heat transfer responses on the in-cylinder and exhaust manifold diesel engine surfaces. Appl Energy 2011, 88:867-881.
17. Palit A.K., Popovic D. Computational intelligence in time series forecasting theory and engineering applications 2005, Springer-Verlag London Limited.
18. Dingyü X., Chen Y. Solving applied mathematical problems with MATLAB® 2009, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
19. Teir S. Steam boiler technology 2003, Helsinky University of Technology, p. 81-4. 2nd ed.
20. Blanco J.M., Peña F. Analytical study of the effects of the clogging of a mechanical precipitator unit in air preheaters in a high-performance thermoelectric power plant based on available data. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2008, 130(2):22001-22007.
21. Peña F., Blanco J.M. Evaluation of the physical dew point in the economizer of a combined cycle burning natural gas. Appl Therm Eng 2006, 27:2153-2158.
22. Jiang T., Chen B., He X., Stuart P. Application of steady-state detection method based on wavelet transform. Comput Chem Eng 2003, 27:569-578.
23. Neha S., Vilankar K.P.R., Rhinehart R. Type-II critical values for a steady-state identifier. J Process Control 2010, 20(7):885-890.
24. Kim M., Yoon S.H., Domanski P.A., Payne W.V. Design of a steady-state detector for fault detection and diagnosis of a residential air conditioner. J Refrig 2008, 31:790-799.
25. Bhat S.A., Saraf D.N. Steady-state identification, gross error detection, and data reconciliation for industrial process units. Ind Eng Chem Res 2004, 43(10):4323-4336.
26. Schladt M., Hui B. Soft sensors on nonlinear steady-state data reconciliation in the process industry. Chem Eng Proc 2007, 46:1107-1115.
27. Kiluk S. Algorithmic acquisition of diagnostic patterns in district heating billing system. Appl Energy 2012, 91:146-155.
28. Li Y.G., Nilkitsaranont P. Gas turbine performance prognostic for condition-based maintenance. Appl Energy 2009, 86:2152-2161.
29. Maffezzoni C. Boiler-turbine dynamics in power-plant control. Control Eng Pract 1997, 5(3):301-312.
30. Lu S., Hogg B.W. Dynamic nonlinear modeling of power plant by physical principles and neural networks. J Electr Power Energy Syst 2000, 22(1):67-78.
31. Verda V., Serra L., Valero A. Thermoeconomic diagnosis: zooming strategy applied to highly complex energy systems. Part 1: detection and localization of anomalies. ASME Energy Resour Technol 2005, 127:42-49.
32. Verda V., Serra L., Valero A. Thermoeconomic diagnosis: zooming strategy applied to highly complex energy systems. Part 2: on the choice of the productive structure. ASME Energy Resour Technol 2005, 127:50-58.
33. Torres C., Valero A., Serra L., Royo J. Structural theory and thermoeconomic diagnosis. Part I: on malfunction and dysfunction analysis. Energy Convers Manage 2002, 43:1503-1518.
34. Poma C., Verda V., Consonni S. Design and performance evaluation of a waste-to-energy plant integrated with a combined cycle. Energy 2010, 35:786-793.
35. Popovíc D., Mijailovíc S. An efficient methodology for the analysis of primary frequency control of electric power system. J Electr Power Energy Syst 2000, 22:331-341.
36. Electrical Company's Team. Overconsumption methodology for the power plant below experimentation. Technical report of performance tests; 2010. p. 1-18.
37. Blanco J.M., Peña F. Optimizing the process for emptying the carbon dioxide cylinders used for hydrogen sweeping in high-power electrical generators. Appl Therm Eng 2012, 39:132-139.