Intraoperative Adjuncts in Colorectal Surgery

Surgical Clinics of North America

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 33-43

  Moloo, Husein ^a   Etzioni, David A ^b  

^a OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesion prevention; Intraabdominal drains; Intraoperative adjuncts colorectal surgery; Omentoplasty; Proximal diversion; Wound closure technique

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; FERRIC HYALURONATE; HYALURONIC ACID; ICODEXTRIN; RINGER LACTATE SOLUTION; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CHEMICAL FLUID INSTILLATION; COLORECTAL SURGERY; COLOSTOMY; DRUG INSTILLATION; FLOTATION; HUMAN; HYDROFLOTATION; ILEOSTOMY; LAPAROTOMY; MECHANICAL BARRIER; OMENTOPLASTY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PELVIS SURGERY; PERITONEUM ADHESION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL DIVERSION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SMALL INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; SUCTION DRAINAGE; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNITED STATES; WOUND CLOSURE;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CELLULOSE, OXIDIZED; COLONIC DISEASES; COLOSTOMY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; RECTAL DISEASES; SUCTION; WOUND CLOSURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84869744632     PISSN: 00396109     EISSN: 15583171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.09.007     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Alves A., Panis Y., Mathieu P., et al. Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg 2005, 140(3):278-283. [discussion: 284].
2. Ragg J.L., Watters D.A., Guest G.D. Preoperative risk stratification for mortality and major morbidity in major colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2009, 52(7):1296-1303.
3. Etzioni D.A., Beart R.W., Madoff R.D., et al. Impact of the aging population on the demand for colorectal procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 2009, 52(4):583-590. [discussion 590-1].
4. Schilling P.L., Dimick J.B., Birkmeyer J.D. Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2008, 207(5):698-704.
5. Peeters K.C., Tollenaar R.A., Marijnen C.A., et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005, 92(2):211-216.
6. Urbach D.R., Kennedy E.D., Cohen M.M. Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1999, 229(2):174-180.
7. Brown S.R., Seow-Choen F., Eu K.W., et al. A prospective randomised study of drains in infra-peritoneal rectal anastomoses. Tech Coloproctol 2001, 5(2):89-92.
8. Merad F., Hay J.M., Fingerhut A., et al. Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. French Association for Surgical Research. Surgery 1999, 125(5):529-535.
9. Sagar P.M., Hartley M.N., Macfie J., et al. Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1995, 38(3):254-258.
10. Yeh C.Y., Changchien C.R., Wang J.Y., et al. Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients-A prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 2005, 241(1):9-13.
11. Tan W.S., Tang C.L., Shi L., et al. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009, 96(5):462-472.
12. Guenaga K.F., Lustosa S.A., Saad S.S., et al. Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, (1). CD004647.
13. Rondelli F., Reboldi P., Rulli A., et al. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009, 24(5):479-488.
14. Chow A., Tilney H.S., Paraskeva P., et al. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009, 24(6):711-723.
15. Luglio G., Pendlimari R., Holubar S.D., et al. Loop ileostomy reversal after colon and rectal surgery: a single institutional 5-year experience in 944 patients. Arch Surg 2011, 146(10):1191-1196.
16. Hasegawa H., Radley S., Morton D.G., et al. Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2000, 231(2):202-204.
17. Loffler T., Seiler C.M., Rossion I., et al. Hand-suture versus stapling for closure of loop ileostomy: HASTA-Trial: a study rationale and design for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2011, 12:34.
18. Dasari B.V., McKay D., Gardiner K. Laparoscopic versus Open surgery for small bowel Crohn's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, (1). CD006956.
19. John H., Buchmann P. Improved perineal wound healing with the omental pedicle graft after rectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991, 6(4):193-196.
20. Hao X.Y., Yang K.H., Guo T.K., et al. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008, 23(12):1159-1165.
21. Dijkstra F.R., Nieuwenhuijzen M., Reijnen M.M., et al. Recent clinical developments in pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of intra-abdominal adhesions. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 2000, 232:52-59.
22. van der Wal J.B., Jeekel J. Biology of the peritoneum in normal homeostasis and after surgical trauma. Colorectal Dis 2007, 9(Suppl 2):9-13.
23. Kossi J., Salminen P., Rantala A., et al. Population-based study of the surgical workload and economic impact of bowel obstruction caused by postoperative adhesions. Br J Surg 2003, 90(11):1441-1444.
24. Ray N.F., Denton W.G., Thamer M., et al. Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 1998, 186(1):1-9.
25. Tingstedt B., Isaksson J., Andersson R. Long-term follow-up and cost analysis following surgery for small bowel obstruction caused by intra-abdominal adhesions. Br J Surg 2007, 94(6):743-748.
26. Wilson M.S., Hawkswell J., McCloy R.F. Natural history of adhesional small bowel obstruction: counting the cost. Br J Surg 1998, 85(9):1294-1298.
27. Taylor G.W., Jayne D.G., Brown S.R., et al. Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial. Br J Surg 2010, 97(1):70-78.
28. Cooke S.A., Hamilton D.G. The significance of starch powder contamination in the aetiology of peritoneal adhesions. Br J Surg 1977, 64(6):410-412.
29. van den Tol M.P., Haverlag R., van Rossen M.E., et al. Glove powder promotes adhesion formation and facilitates tumour cell adhesion and growth. Br J Surg 2001, 88(9):1258-1263.
30. Catena F., Ansaloni L., Di Saverio S., et al. P.O.P.A. study: prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by icodextrin 4% solution after laparotomy for adhesive small bowel obstruction. A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2012, 16(2):382-388.
31. Tjandra J.J., Chan M.K. A sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier facilitates closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy: a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008, 51(6):956-960.
32. Kumar S., Wong P.F., Leaper D.J. Intra-peritoneal prophylactic agents for preventing adhesions and adhesive intestinal obstruction after non-gynaecological abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, (1). CD005080.
33. Beck D.E., Cohen Z., Fleshman J.W., et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 2003, 46(10):1310-1319.
34. Fazio V.W., Cohen Z., Fleshman J.W., et al. Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2006, 49(1):1-11.
35. Wiseman D.M., Trout J.R., Diamond M.P. The rates of adhesion development and the effects of crystalloid solutions on adhesion development in pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 1998, 70(4):702-711.
36. Diener M.K., Voss S., Jensen K., et al. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2010, 251(5):843-856.
37. Millbourn D., Cengiz Y., Israelsson L.A. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 2009, 144(11):1056-1059.
38. Israelsson L.A., Jonsson T., Knutsson A. Suture technique and wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. Eur J Surg 1996, 162(8):605-609.
39. Jenkins T.P. The burst abdominal wound: a mechanical approach. Br J Surg 1976, 63(11):873-876.
40. Harlaar J.J., Deerenberg E.B., van Ramshorst G.H., et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions. BMC Surg 2011, 11:20.
41. Cardosi R.J., Drake J., Holmes S., et al. Subcutaneous management of vertical incisions with 3 or more centimeters of subcutaneous fat. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 195(2):607-614.
42. Paral J., Ferko A., Varga J., et al. Comparison of sutured versus non-sutured subcutaneous fat tissue in abdominal surgery. A prospective randomized study. Eur Surg Res 2007, 39(6):350-358.
43. Iavazzo C., Gkegkes I.D., Vouloumanou E.K., et al. Sutures versus staples for the management of surgical wounds: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Surg 2011, 77(9):1206-1221.
44. Coulthard P., Esposito M., Worthington H.V., et al. Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, (5). CD004287.