Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy. A randomized controlled trial

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 231, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 202-204

  Hasegawa, Hirotoshi ^a   Radley, Simon ^a   Morton, Dion G ^a   Keighley, Michael R B ^a  

^a QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STAPLER; SUTURE; SUTURING METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 0033952711     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200002000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Beart RW, et al. Temporary ileostomy for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Function and complications. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29:300-303.
2. Van de Pavoordt HD, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL. The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases. Intl J Colorectal Dis 1987; 2:214-217.
3. Bain IM, Keighley MRB, Patel R. Comparison of sutured and stapled closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 78:555-556.
4. Wexner SD, Taranow DA, Johansen OB, et al. Loop ileostomy is a safe option for fecal diversion. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:349-354.
5. Berry DP, Scholefield JH. Closure of loop ileostomy. Br J Surg 1997; 84:524.
6. Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH. De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 1986; 73:566-570.
7. Hull TL, Kobe I, Fazio VW. Comparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:1086-1089.