Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 70-78

  Taylor, G W ^a   Jayne, D G ^a   Brown, S R ^b   Thorpe, H ^b   Brown, J M ^b   Dewberry, S C ^b   Parker, M C ^c   Guillou, P J ^a  

^a ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c DARENT VALLEY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON SURGERY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HUMANS; INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 72949101185     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6742     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions - how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990; 72: 60-63.
2. Menzies D. Postoperative adhesions: their treatment and relevance in clinical practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993; 75: 147-153.
3. Ellis H. The magnitude of adhesion related problems. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1998; 87: 9-11.
4. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999; 353: 1476-1480.
5. Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, Sunderland G, Thompson JN, Clark DN et al. Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research (SCAR) Group. Colorectal surgery: the risk and burden of adhesion-related complications. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 506-511.
6. Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, Sunderland G, Clark DN, Knight AD et al. Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research (SCAR) Group. The SCAR-3 study: 5-year adhesion-related readmission risk following lower abdominal surgical procedures. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 551-558.
7. Wilson MS, Menzies D, Knight AD, Crowe AM. Demonstrating the clinical and cost effectiveness of adhesion reduction strategies. Colorectal Dis 2002; 4: 355-360.
8. Hiki N, Shimizu N, Yamaguchi H, Imamura K, Kami K, Kubota K et al. Manipulation of the small intestine as a cause of the increased inflammatory response after open compared with laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 195-204.
9. Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW. Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197: 177-181.
10. Audebert AJ, Gomel V. Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 631-635.
11. Lumley J, Stitz R, Stevenson A, Fielding G, Luck A. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: intermediate to long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 867-872.
12. Polymeneas G, Theodosopoulos T, Stamatiadis A, Kourias E. A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 41-43.
13. Dowson HM, Bong JJ, Lovell DP, Worthington TR, Karanjia ND, Rockall TA. Reduced adhesion formation following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 909-914.
14. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 2003; 362: 1561-1571.
15. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl JMed 2000; 343: 392-398.
16. Podnos YD, Jimenez JC,Wilson SE, Stevens CM, Nguyen NT. Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a review of 3464 cases. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 957-961.
17. Coda A, Bossotti M, Ferri F, Mattio R, Ramellini G, Poma A et al. Incisional hernia and fascial defect following laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000; 10: 34-38.
18. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 1718-1726.
19. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3061-3068.
20. Franks PJ, Bosanquet N, Thorpe H, Brown JM, Copeland J, Smith AM et al. Short-term costs of conventional vs laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial). Br J Cancer 2006; 95: 6-12.
21. Murray A, Lourenco T, de Verteuil R, Hernandez R, Fraser C, McKinley A et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2006; 10: 1-141.
22. International Conference on Harmonisation E9 Expert Working Group. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Statistical principles for clinical trials. Stat Med 1999; 18: 1905-1942.
23. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP et al. Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 207-214.
24. Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Copeland J, Brown JM; Medical Research Council Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery In Colorectal Cancer Trial Group. Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 199-205.
25. Tonouchi H, Ohmori Y, Kobayashi M, Kusunoki M. Trocar site hernia. Arch Surg 2004; 139: 1248-1256.