Precursors linked via the zipper-like structure or the filopodium during the secondary fusion of osteoclasts

Communicative and Integrative Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 453-457

  Takito, Jiro ^a,b   Nakamura, Masanori ^a  

^a SHOWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Actin; Cell cell interaction; Filopodia; Fusion; Osteoclast; Podosome; Superstructure

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869740675     PISSN: 19420889     EISSN: 19420889     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cib.20980     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Suda T, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Jimi E, Gillespie MT, Martin TJ. Modulation of osteoclast differentiation and function by the new members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor and ligand families. Endocr Rev 1999; 20:345-57; http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/er.20.3.345.
2. Vignery A. Macrophage fusion: the making of osteoclasts and giant cells. J Exp Med 2005; 202:337-40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20051123.
3. Kukita T, Wada N, Kukita A, Kakimoto T, Sandra F, Toh K, et al. RANKL-induced DC-STAMP is essential for osteoclastogenesis. J Exp Med 2004; 200:941-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20040518.
4. Yagi M, Miyamoto T, Sawatani Y, Iwamoto K, Hosogane N, Fujita N, et al. DC-STAMP is essential for cell-cell fusion in osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells. J Exp Med 2005; 202:345-51; http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20050645.
5. Takito J, Nakamura M, Yoda M, Tohmonda T, Uchikawa S, Horiuchi K, et al. The transient appearance of zipper-like actin superstructures during the fusion of osteoclasts. J Cell Sci 2012; 125:662-72; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.090886.
6. Yonemura S, Itoh M, Nagafuchi A, Tsukita S. Cell-tocell adherens junction formation and actin filament organization: similarities and differences between nonpolarized fibroblasts and polarized epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 1995; 108:127-42.
7. Cavey M, Lecuit T. Molecular bases of cell-cell junctions stability and dynamics. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2009; 1:2998; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a002998.
8. Vasioukhin V, Bauer C, Yin M, Fuchs E. Directed actin polymerization is the driving force for epithelial cell-cell adhesion. Cell 2000; 100:209-19; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81559-7.
9. Linder S, Aepfelbacher M. Podosomes: adhesion hotspots of invasive cells. Trends Cell Biol 2003; 13:376-85; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(03)00128-4.
10. Jurdic P, Saltel F, Chabadel A, Destaing O. Podosome and sealing zone: specificity of the osteoclast model. Eur J Cell Biol 2006; 85:195-202; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.09.008.
11. Zaidel-Bar R, Itzkovitz S, Ma'ayan A, Iyengar R, Geiger B. Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9:858-67; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/ncb0807-858.
12. Schiller HB, Friedel CC, Boulegue C, Fässler R. Quantitative proteomics of the integrin adhesome show a myosin II-dependent recruitment of LIM domain proteins. EMBO Rep 2011; 12:259-66; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2011.5.
13. Chabadel A, Bañon-Rodríguez I, Cluet D, Rudkin BB, Wehrle-Haller B, Genot E, et al. CD44 and beta3 integrin organize two functionally distinct actin-based domains in osteoclasts. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:4899-910; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-04-0378.
14. Destaing O, Saltel F, Géminard JC, Jurdic P, Bard F. Podosomes display actin turnover and dynamic self-organization in osteoclasts expressing actin-green fluorescent protein. Mol Biol Cell 2003; 14:407-16; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E02-07-0389.
15. Nakamura I, Takahashi N, Sasaki T, Jimi E, Kurokawa T, Suda T. Chemical and physical properties of the extracellular matrix are required for the actin ring formation in osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11:1873-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650111207.
16. Saltel F, Destaing O, Bard F, Eichert D, Jurdic P. Apatitemediated actin dynamics in resorbing osteoclasts. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:5231-41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-06-0522.
17. Geblinger D, Addadi L, Geiger B. Nano-topography sensing by osteoclasts. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:1503-10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.060954.
18. Evans JG, Correia I, Krasavina O, Watson N, Matsudaira P. Macrophage podosomes assemble at the leading lamella by growth and fragmentation. J Cell Biol 2003; 161:697-705; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200212037.
19. Yang L, Huang HW. Observation of a membrane fusion intermediate structure. Science 2002; 297:1877-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1074354.
20. Anderegg F, Geblinger D, Horvath P, Charnley M, Textor M, Addadi L, et al. Substrate adhesion regulates sealing zone architecture and dynamics in cultured osteoclasts. PLoS One 2011; 6:28583; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028583.
21. Rustom A, Saffrich R, Markovic I, Walther P, Gerdes HH. Nanotubular highways for intercellular organelle transport. Science 2004; 303:1007-10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1093133.
22. Watkins SC, Salter RD. Functional connectivity between immune cells mediated by tunneling nanotubules. Immunity 2005; 23:309-18; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.08.009.
23. Mensah KA, Ritchlin CT, Schwarz EM. RANKL induces heterogeneous DC-STAMP(lo) and DC-STAMP(hi) osteoclast precursors of which the DC-STAMP(lo) precursors are the master fusogens. J Cell Physiol 2010; 223:76-83.