Negotiating Within the Context of Planning Reform: Public and Private Reflections from New South Wales, Australia

International Planning Studies

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 397-418

  Ruming, Kristian ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NEGOTIATION PROCESS; PLANNING SYSTEM; POLICY REFORM;

AUSTRALIA; NEW SOUTH WALES;

EID: 84869446467     PISSN: 13563475     EISSN: 14699265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2012.739335     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Adams, D., Disberry, A., Hutchinson, N. and Munjoma, T. 2002. "The impact of land management and development strategies on urban redevelopment prospects". In Development and Developers, Edited by: Guy, S. and Henneberry, J. 137-157. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Albrechts, L. 2003. Reconstructing decision-making: Planning versus politics. Planning Theory, 2(3): 249-268. (doi:10.1177/147309520323007)
3. Allen, J. 2003. Lost Geographies of Power, Malden: Blackwell.
4. Allmendinger, P. and Haughton, G. 2010. Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(5): 803-818. (doi:10.1068/c09163)
5. Ambrose, P. 1994. Urban Processes and Power, London: Routledge.
6. Ball, M. 2003. Markets and the structure of the housebuilding industry: An international perspective. Urban Studies, 40(5-6): 897-916. (doi:10.1080/0042098032000074236)
7. Ball, M. and Allmendinger, P. 2008. Change, rigidity and delay in the UK system of land-use development control working paper 15/08. Reading: Reading school of real estate and planning.
8. Booth, P. 1996. Controlling Development: Certainty in Europe, the USA and Hong Kong, London: UCL Press.
9. Booth, P. 2002. A desperately slow system? The origins and nature of the current discourse on development control. Planning Perspectives, 17(4): 309-325. (doi:10.1080/02665430210154731)
10. Booth, P. 2003. Planning by Consent: The Origins and Nature of British Development Control, London: Routledge.
11. Booth, P. 2007. The control of discretion: Planning and the common-law tradition. Planning Theory, 6(2): 127-145. (doi:10.1177/1473095207077585)
12. Buitelaar, E., Galle, M. and Sorel, N. 2011. Plan-led planning systems in development-led practices: An empirical analysis into the (lack of) institutionalisation of planning law. Environment and Planning A, 43(4): 928-941. (doi:10.1068/a43400)
13. Bunker, R. and Searle, G. 2009. Theory and practice in metropolitan strategy: Situating recent Australian planning. Urban Policy and Research, 27(2): 101-116. (doi:10.1080/08111140902971426)
14. Campbell, H. and Henneberry, J. 2005. Planning obligations, the market orientation of planning and planning profession. Journal of Property Research, 22(1): 37-59. (doi:10.1080/09599910500411036)
15. Campbell, H., Henneberry, J. and Rowley, S. 2001. Contradictory Actions: Policy, Finance and the Negotiation of Planning Obligations, London: RICS Foundation.
16. Carmona, M. and Sieh, L. 2008. Performance measurement in planning - Towards a holistic view. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(2): 428-454. (doi:10.1068/c62m)
17. Claydon, J. 1996. "Negotiations in planning". In Implementing Town Planning, Edited by: Greed, C. 110-120. Harlow: Longman.
18. Claydon, J. 1998. Discretion in development control: A study of how discretion is exercised in the conduct of development control in England and Wales. Planning, Practice and Research, 13(1): 53-62. (doi:10.1080/02697459816292)
19. Claydon, J. and Chick, M. 2005. Teaching negotiations. Planning, Practice and Research, 20(2): 211-234. (doi:10.1080/02697450500414710)
20. Claydon, J. and Smith, B. 1997. Negotiating gains through the british development control system. Urban Studies, 34(12): 2003-2022. (doi:10.1080/0042098975196)
21. Coiacetto, E. 2007. The role of the development industry in shaping urban space: A conceptual model. Geographical Research, 45(4): 340-347. (doi:10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00473.x)
22. Cook, N. and Ruming, K. J. 2008. On the fringe of neoliberalism: Residential development in outer suburban sydney. Australian Geographer, 39(3): 211-228. (doi:10.1080/00049180802056864)
23. Crook, A. D.H. and Monk, S. 2011. Planning gains, providing homes. Housing Studies, 26(7-8): 997-1018. (doi:10.1080/02673037.2011.619423)
24. D'Arcy, E. and Keogh, G. 2002. "The market context of property development activity". In Development and Developers, Edited by: Guy, S. and Henneberry, J. 19-34. Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Doak, J. and Karadimitriou, N. 2007. (Re)Development, complexity and networks: A framework for research. Urban Studies, 44(2): 209-229. (doi:10.1080/00420980601074953)
26. Dodson, J., Coiacetto, E. and Ellway, C. 2006. "Corruption in the Australian land development process: Identifying a research agenda". In Proceedings of the 2nd State of Australian Cities Conference, Brisbane: Griffith University.
27. Dowling, R. 2005. Residential building in Australia, 1993-2003. Urban Policy and Research, 23(4): 447-464. (doi:10.1080/08111470500391424)
28. Ennis, F. 1997. Infrastructure provision, the negotiation process and the planner's role. Urban Studies, 34(12): 1935-1954. (doi:10.1080/0042098975150)
29. Essex, S. 1996. "Members and officers in the planning process". In British Planning Policy in Transition: Planning in the 1990s, Edited by: Tewdwr-Jones, in M. 159-170. London: UCL Press.
30. Faludi, A. 1987. "A discretion-centred view of environmental planning". Oxford: Pergamon Press.
31. Farthing, S. and Ashley, K. 2002. Negotiations and the delivery of affordable housing through the english planning system. Planning Practice and Research, 17(1): 45-58. (doi:10.1080/02697450220125078)
32. Forsyth, A. 1999. Administrative discretion and urban and regional planners' values. Journal of Planning Literature, 14(5): 5-15. (doi:10.1177/08854129922092559)
33. Gleeson, B. 2001. Devolution and state planning systems in Australia. International Planning Studies, 6(2): 133-152. (doi:10.1080/13563470123226)
34. Gurran, N. 2007. Australian Urban Land Use Planning: Introducing Statutory Planning Practice in New South Wales, Sydney: Sydney University Press.
35. Gurran, N., Ruming, K. J. and Randolph, B. 2009. Counting the Costs: Planning Requirements, Infrastructure Contributions and Residential Development in Australia Final Report. Melbourne: Australian Housing Research Institute
36. Guy, S. and Henneberry, J. 2002. "Approaching development". In Development and Developers, Edited by: Guy, S. and Henneberry, J. 1-18. Oxford: Blackwell.
37. Hanssen, G. S. 2012. Negotiating urban space: The challenge of political steering in market- and network-oriented urban planning. Scandinavian Political Studies, 35(1): 22-47. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2011.00278.x)
38. Harris, N. 1998. The art of delegation: Officer-delegation in development control. Planning, Practice and Research, 13(3): 267-281. (doi:10.1080/02697459816067)
39. Hazzard, B. 2011a. Media Release: Overhaul of the Planning System Heralds a New Era in NSW, Sydney: Minister for Planning and Infrastructure.
40. Hazzard, B. 2011b. Media Release: Too Complicated: NSW Residents' Views of the Planning System, Sydney: Minister for Planning and Infrastructure.
41. Healey, P. 1996. "Planning through debate". In Readings in Planning Theory, Edited by: Campbell, in S. and Fainstein, S. 234-257. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
42. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning, London: MacMillan.
43. Healey, P. 1998. Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 30(9): 1531-1546. (doi:10.1068/a301531)
44. Healey, P. 2006. Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. European Planning Studies, 14(3): 299-320. (doi:10.1080/09654310500420792)
45. Healey, P. and Barrett, S. 1990. Strategies and agency in land and property development process: Some ideas for research. Urban Studies, 27(1): 89-104. (doi:10.1080/00420989020080051)
46. Healey, P., Purdue, M. and Ennis, F. 1995. Negotiating Development: Rationales and Practices for Development Obligations and Planning Gain, London: Taylor and Francis.
47. Hillier, J. 2000. Going round the back? Complex networks and informal action in local planning processes. Environment and Planning A, 32(1): 33-54. (doi:10.1068/a321)
48. Hoch, C. 2007. Pragmatic communicative action theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(3): 272-283. (doi:10.1177/0739456X06295029)
49. ICAC (Independent Commission Against Corruption). 2008. Report on Investigation into Corruption Allegations Affecting Wollongong City Council, Sydney: ICAC.
50. ICAC (Independent Commission Against Corruption). 2009. Attempts to Improperly Influence Ku-ring-gai Council Officers, Sydney: ICAC.
51. Kelly, M. and Gilg, A. 2000. The analysis of development control decision making: A autionary tale from recent work of aggregate date. Planning, Practice and Research, 15(4): 335-342. (doi:10.1080/713691911)
52. Lyons, J. 2008. Great council swindle. The Australian, 6/3/2008: 12
53. March, A. 2007. Institutional impediments to planning professionalism in Victoria. International Planning Studies, 12(4): 367-389. (doi:10.1080/13563470701745512)
54. McClymont, K. 2011. Revitalising the political: Development control and agonism in planning practice. Planning Theory, 10(3): 239-256. (doi:10.1177/1473095211399398)
55. Moore, T. and Dyer, R. 2011. "The way ahead for planning in NSW?". In Issues Paper of the NSW Planning System Review, Sydney: NSW Government.
56. Moroni, S. 2007. Planning, liberty and the rule of law. Planning Theory, 6(2): 146-163. (doi:10.1177/1473095207077586)
57. Munoz Gielen, D. and Tasan-Kok, T. 2010. Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public-value capturing in the UK, Spain and the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 18(7): 1097-1131. (doi:10.1080/09654311003744191)
58. NSWDOP (New South Wales Department of Planning). 2007. Improving the NSW Planning system Discussion Paper, Sydney: New South Wales Department of Planning.
59. Peck, J. and Tickell, A. 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3): 380-404. (doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00247)
60. Ploger, J. 2004. Strife: Urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory, 3(1): 71-92. (doi:10.1177/1473095204042318)
61. Raco, M. 2005. Sustainable development, rolled-out neo-liberalism and sustainable communities. Antipode, 37(2): 324-347. (doi:10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00495.x)
62. Rivolin, U. 2008. Conforming and performing planning systems in europe: An unbearable cohabitation. Planning Practice and Research, 23(2): 167-186. (doi:10.1080/02697450802327081)
63. Ruming, K. J. 2009. Development configurations and planning negotiations: A case of fringe development in Sydney, Australia. Urban Studies, 46(7): 1461-1483. (doi:10.1177/0042098009104576)
64. Ruming, K. J. 2010. Developer typologies in urban renewal in Sydney: Recognising the role of informal associations between developers and local government. Urban Policy and Research, 28(1): 65-83. (doi:10.1080/08111140903356403)
65. Ruming, K. J. 2011. Cutting red tape or cutting local capacity? Responses by local government planners to NSW planning changes. Australian Planner, 48(1): 43-54. (doi:10.1080/07293682.2011.530588)
66. Ruming, K. J. 2012. Creating Australia's best planning system? Private sector responses to nsw planning change. Australian Planner, 48(4): 257-269. (doi:10.1080/07293682.2011.592504)
67. Ruming, K. J., Gurran, N. and Randolph, B. 2011. Housing affordability and development contributions: New perspectives from industry and local government in new south wales, Victoria and Queensland. Urban Policy and Research, 29(3): 257-274. (doi:10.1080/08111146.2011.592136)
68. Sagalyn, L. B. 1997. Negotiating for public benefits: The bargaining calculus of public-private development. Urban Studies, 34(12): 1955-1970. (doi:10.1080/0042098975169)
69. Sager, T. 2009. Planners' role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities. European Planning Studies, 17(1): 65-84. (doi:10.1080/09654310802513948)
70. Sager, T. 2011. Neo-Liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990-2010. Progress in Planning, 76(4): 147-199.
71. Shmueli, D. F., Kaufman, S. and Ozawa, C. 2008. Mining negotiation theory for planning insights. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(3): 359-364. (doi:10.1177/0739456X07311074)
72. Smith, S. 2008. The NSW Planning System: Proposed Reforms, Briefing Paper No 1/2008, Sydney: NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service.
73. Snary, C. 2004. Understanding risk: The planning officers' perspective. Urban Studies, 41(1): 33-55. (doi:10.1080/0042098032000155678)
74. Steele, W. and Ruming, K. J. 2012. Flexibility versus certainty: Unsettling the land-use planning shibboleth. Planning Practice and Research, 27(2): 155-176. (doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.662670)
75. Stiftel, B. Across the Counter: A 2-table Perspective on British Development Control. Paper presented at the World Planning Schools Congress. Mexico City.
76. Tang, B., Choy, L. H. T. and Wat, J. K. F. 2000. Certainty and discretion in planning control: A case study of office development in Hong Kong. Urban Studies, 37(13): 2465-2483. (doi:10.1080/00420980020080641)
77. Tasan-Kok, T. 2008. Changing interpretations of 'flexibility' in the planning literature: From opportunism to creativity?. International Planning Studies, 13(3): 183-195. (doi:10.1080/13563470802521382)
78. Tichelar, M. and Watts, L. 2000. Role players and authority figures: Informal power relationships with local authorities. Policy and Politics, 28(2): 221-231. (doi:10.1332/0305573002500938)
79. Urban Development Institute of Australia. 2009. Inquiry into the NSW Planning Framework, Submission of the Urban Development Institute of Australia, 9 March, Sydney: UDIA.
80. Urban Taskforce. 2009. It's Time for Jobs: How the Planning System can be Reformed, Submission to the Standing Committee on State Development Inquiry into the New South Wales Planning Framework, 30 March, Sydney: Urban Taskforce.
81. Verhage, R. and Needham, B. 1997. Negotiating about the residential environment: It is not only money that matters. Urban Studies, 34(12): 2053-2068. (doi:10.1080/0042098975222)
82. Wadley, D. 2004. Good development, better planning: The nexus revisited. Planning, Practice and Research, 19(2): 173-193. (doi:10.1080/0269745042000284403)