Evidence for Genetic Variation in Human Mate Preferences for Sexually Dimorphic Physical Traits

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Verweij, Karin J H ^a,b   Burri, Andrea V ^c   Zietsch, Brendan P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b QIMR BERGHOFER MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^c ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BREAST SIZE; CHEST HAIR; CUTANEOUS PARAMETERS; DIZYGOTIC TWINS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FACIAL HAIR; FEMALE; FORCED CHOICE METHOD; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HAIR COLOR; HAIR LENGTH; HEREDITY; HERITABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; NORMAL HUMAN; ORGAN SIZE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKIN COLOR; TWINS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BODY HEIGHT; BREAST; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; HAIR; HAIR COLOR; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SKIN PIGMENTATION;

EID: 84869142937     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049294     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Darwin CR (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
2. Frost P, (2006) European hair and eye color- A case of frequency-dependent sexual selection? Evolution and Human Behavior 27: 85-103.
3. Aoki K, (2002) Sexual selection as a cause of human skin colour variation: Darwin's hypothesis revisited. Annals of Human Biology 29: 589-608.
4. Moller AP, Soler M, Thornhill R, (1995) Breast asymmetry, sexual selection, and human reproductive success. Ethology and Sociobiology 16: 207-219.
5. Neave N, Shields K, (2008) The effects of facial hair manipulation on female perceptions of attractiveness, masculinity, and dominance in male faces. Personality and Individual Differences 45: 373-377.
6. Pawlowski B, Dunbar RIM, Lipowicz A, (2000) Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature 403: 156-156.
7. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Frost P, (1994) Preference for darker faces in photographs at different phases of the menstrual cycle: Preliminary assessment of evidence for a hormonal relationship. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79: 507-514.
9. Mesko N, Bereczkei T, (2004) Hairstyle as an adaptive means of displaying phenotypic quality. Human Nature-an Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective 15: 251-270.
10. Feinman S, Gill GW, (1978) Sex-differences in physical attractiveness preferences. Journal of Social Psychology 105: 43-52.
11. Lewis MB, (2011) Who is the fairest of them all? Race, attractiveness and skin color sexual dimorphism. Personality and Individual Differences 50: 159-162.
12. Courtiol A, Raymond M, Godelle B, Ferdy JB, (2010) Mate choice and human stature: Homogamy as a unified framework for understanding mate preferences. Evolution 64: 2189-2203.
13. Dixson BJ, Grimshaw GM, Linklater WL, Dixson AF (2010) Eye tracking of men's preferences for female breast size and areola pigmentation. Archives of Sexual Behavior: 1-8.
14. Irwin DE, Price T, (1999) Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity 82: 347-354.
15. Kendrick KM, Hinton MR, Atkins K, Haupt MA, Skinner JD, (1998) Mothers determine sexual preferences. Nature 395: 229-230.
16. Rantala MJ, Marcinkowska UM, (2011) The role of sexual imprinting and the Westermarck effect in mate choice in humans. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65: 859-873.
17. Zietsch BP, Verweij KJH, Heath AC, Martin NG, (2011) Variation in human mate choice: Simultaneously investigating heritability, parental influence, sexual imprinting, and assortative mating. American Naturalist 177: 605-616.
18. Jennions MD, Petrie M, (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 72: 283-327.
19. Collins RD, Carde RT, (1989) Heritable variation in pheremone response of the pink-bullworm, Pectinophora-gossypiella (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 2647-2659.
20. Jang YW, Greenfield MD, (2000) Quantitative genetics of female choice in an ultrasonic pyralid moth, Achroia grisella: variation and evolvability of preference along multiple dimensions of the male advertisement signal. Heredity 84: 73-80.
21. Iyengar VK, Reeve HK, Eisner T, (2002) Paternal inheritance of a female moth's mating preference. Nature 419: 830-832.
22. Gray DA, Cade WH, (1999) Quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Evolution 53: 848-854.
23. Simmons LW, (2004) Genotypic variation in calling song and female preferences of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Animal Behaviour 68: 313-322.
24. Hall M, Lindholm AK, Brooks R (2004) Direct selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response. Bmc Evolutionary Biology 4.
25. Brooks R, Endler JA, (2001) Female guppies agree to differ: Phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 55: 1644-1655.
26. Delcourt M, Blows MW, Rundle HD, (2010) Quantitative genetics of female mate preferences in an ancestral and a novel envrironment. Evolution 64: 2758-2766.
27. Schielzeth H, Bolund E, Forstmeier W, (2010) Heritability of and early environment effects on variation in mating preferences. Evolution 64: 998-1006.
28. Roberts T, Roiser JP, (2010) In the nose of the beholder: are olfactory influences on human mate choice driven by variation in immune system genes or sex hormone levels? Experimental Biology and Medicine 235: 1277-1281.
29. Lie HC, Simmons LW, Rhodes G, (2010) Genetic dissimilarity, genetic diversity, and mate preferences in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 31: 48-58.
30. Roberts SC, Little AC, Gosling LM, Jones BC, Perrett DI, et al. (2005) MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans. Biology Letters 1: 400-403.
31. Zietsch BP, Verweij KJH, Burri AV (2012) Heritability of preferences for multiple cues of mate quality in humans. Evolution electronic publication ahead of print. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01546.x.
32. Bouchard TJ, McGue M, (2003) Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. Journal of Neurobiology 54: 4-45.
33. Courtiol A, Picq S, Godelle B, Raymond M, Ferdy J-B, (2010) From preferred to actual mate characteristics: The case of human body shape. PLos One 5: e13010.
34. Sesardic N (2005) Making sense of heritability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Spector TD, Williams FMK, (2006) The UK Adult Twin Registry (TwinsUK). Twin Research and Human Genetics 9: 899-906.
36. Andrew T, Hart DJ, Snieder H, de Lange M, Spector TD, et al. (2001) Are twins and singletons comparable? A study of disease-related and lifestyle characteristics in adult women. Twin Research 4: 464-477.
37. Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH (2006) Mx: Statistical modeling. VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry.
38. Posthuma D, Beem AL, de Geus EJC, van Baal GCM, von Hjelmborg JB, et al. (2003) Theory and practice in quantitative genetics. Twin Research 6: 361-376.
39. Neale MC, Cardon LR (1992) Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Boston: Kluwer.
40. Borkenau P, Riemann R, Angleitner A, Spinath FM, (2002) Similarity of childhood experiences and personality resemblance in monozygotic and dizygotic twins: a test of the equal environments assumption. Personality and Individual Differences 33: 261-269.
41. Plomin R, Willerman L, Loehlin JC, (1976) Resemblance in appearance and the equal environments assumption in twin studies of personality traits. Behavior Genetics 6: 43-52.
42. Kendler KS, Thornton LM, Gilman SE, Kessler RC, (2000) Sexual orientation in a US national sample of twin and nontwin sibling pairs. American Journal of Psychiatry 157: 1843-1846.
43. Eaves L, Foley D, Silberg J, (2003) Has the "equal environments" assumption been tested in twin studies? Twin Research 6: 486-489.
44. McEvoy BP, Visscher PM, (2009) Genetics of human height. Economics & Human Biology 7: 294-306.
45. Hill WG, Goddard ME, Visscher PM (2008) Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. Plos Genetics 4.
46. Whitehead RD, Re D, Xiao D, Ozakinci G, Perrett DI, (2012) You are what you eat: Within-subject increases in fruit and vegetable consumption confer beneficial skin-color changes. PLos One 7: e32988.
47. Fuller RC, Houle D, Travis J, (2005) Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. American Naturalist 166: 437-446.
48. Cannon TD, Keller MC (2006) Endophenotypes in the genetic analyses of mental disorders. 267-290.
49. McGuigan K, Rowe L, Blows MW, (2011) Pleiotropy, apparent stabilizing selection and uncovering fitness optima. Trends in ecology and evolution 26: 22-29.
50. Keller MC, Coventry WL, (2005) Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design. Twin Research and Human Genetics 8: 201-213.
51. Keller MC, Medland SE, Duncan LE, (2010) Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models. Behavior Genetics 40: 377-393.