Genotypic variation in calling song and female preferences of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 313-322

  Simmons, Leigh W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALLING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE; SONG;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; CAIRNS; HAWAII [UNITED STATES]; HAWAIIAN ISLANDS; NORTH AMERICA; OAHU; PACIFIC ISLANDS; PACIFIC OCEAN; QUEENSLAND; UNITED STATES;

GRYLLINAE; TELEOGRYLLUS; TELEOGRYLLUS OCEANICUS;

EID: 3242724189     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bakker T.C.M., Pomiankowski A. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 8:1995;129-171
2. Barton N.H. Founder effect speciation. Otte D., Endler J.A. Speciation and its Consequences. 1989;229-256 Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts
3. Becker W.A. Manual of Quantitative Genetics. 1984;Pullman, Washington
4. Bennet-Clark H.C. Songs and the physics of sound production. Huber F., Moore T.E., Loher W. Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology. 1989;227-261 Cornell University Press, Ithaca
5. Bentley D.R. Genetic control of an insect neuronal network. Science. 174:1971;1139-1141
6. Bentley D.R., Hoy R.R. Genetic control of the neuronal network generating cricket (Teleogryllus gryllus) song patterns. Animal Behaviour. 20:1972;478-492
7. Blows M.W. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 269:2002;1113-1118
8. Butlin R.K., Ritchie M.G. Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 37:1989;237-246
9. Butlin R.K., Tregenza T. Levels of genetic polymorphism: marker loci versus quantitative traits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 353:1998;187-198
10. Endler J.A., Houde A.E. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution. 49:1995;456-468
11. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 1996;Longman, Harlow
12. Gray D.A., Cade W.H. Quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Evolution. 53:1999;848-854
13. Gray D.A., Cade W.H. Sex, death and genetic variation: natural and sexual selection on cricket song. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 266:1999;707-709
14. Gray D.A., Cade W.H. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 97:2000;14449-14454
15. Hennig R.M., Weber T. Filtering of temporal parameters of the calling song by females of two closely related species: a behavioral analysis. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 180:1997;621-630
16. Hewitt G.M. Insecta 1. Orthoptera: Grasshoppers and Crickets. 1st edn:1979;Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin
17. Hill G.E. Geographic variation in male ornamentation and female mate preference in the house finch: a comparative test of models of sexual selection. Behavioral Ecology. 5:1994;64-73
18. Hill K.G., Loftus-Hills J.J., Gartside D.F. Pre-mating isolation between the Australian field crickets Teleogryllus commodus and T. oceanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Australian Journal of Zoology. 20:1972;153-163
19. Houde A.E. Evolution by sexual selection: what can population comparisons tell us? American Naturalist. 141:1993;796-803
20. Houle D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics. 130:1992;195-204
21. Howard D.J., Berlocher S.H. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. 1998;Oxford University Press, Oxford
22. Hoy R.R. Genetic control of acoustic behavior in crickets. American Zoologist. 14:1974;1067-1080
23. Hoy R.R., Hahn J., Paul R.C. Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. Science. 195:1977;82-84
24. Kevan D.K.M. Introduced grasshoppers and crickets in Micronesia. Boletin de Sanidad Vegetal. 20:1990;105-123
25. Lynch M., Walsh B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. 1998;Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts
26. Mardia K.V., Kent J.T., Bibby J.M. Multivariate Analysis. 1979;Academic Press, London
27. Mousseau T.A., Dingle H. Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annual Review of Entomology. 36:1991;511-534
28. Mousseau T.A., Fox C.W. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 13:1998;403-407
29. Mousseau T.A., Howard D.J. Genetic variation in cricket calling song across a hybrid zone between two sibling species. Evolution. 52:1998;1104-1110
30. Otte D. Evolution of cricket songs. Journal of Orthopteran Research. 1:1992;25-49
31. Otte D., Alexander R.D. The Australian Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). 1983;Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia
32. Panhuis T.M., Butlin R., Zuk M., Tregenza T. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 16:2001;364-371
33. Parker G.A., Partridge L. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 353:1998;261-274
34. Pollack G.S., Hoy R.R. Phonotaxis to individual rhythmic components of a complex cricket calling song. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 144:1981;367-373
35. Pomiankowski A., Møller A.P. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 260:1995;21-29
36. Ritchie M.G., Phillips S.D.F. The genetics of sexual isolation. Howard D.J., Berlocher S.H. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. 1998;291-308 Oxford University Press, Oxford
37. Roff D.A. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. 1997;Chapman & Hall, New York
38. Rotenberry J.T., Zuk M., Simmons L.W., Hayes C. Phonotactic parasitoids and cricket song structure: an evaluation of alternative hypotheses. Evolutionary Ecology. 10:1996;233-243
39. Ryan M.J., Rand A.S., Weigt L.A. Allozyme and advertisement call variation in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Evolution. 50:1996;2435-2453
40. Scheuber H., Jacot A., Brinkhof M.W.G. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris. Animal Behaviour. 65:2003;721-727
41. Schluter D. Ecological causes of speciation. Howard D.J., Berlocher S.H. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. 1998;114-129 Oxford University Press, Oxford
42. Shaw K.L. Polygenic inheritance of a behavioral phenotype: interspecific genetics of song in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Evolution. 50:1996;256-266
43. Shaw K.L. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preferences in Hawaiian crickets. Evolution. 54:2000;1303-1312
44. Simmons L.W. The evolution of polyandry: an examination of the genetic incompatibility and good-sperm hypotheses. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 14:2001;585-594
45. Simmons L.W., Zuk M., Rotenberry J.T. Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Evolution. 55:2001;1386-1394
46. Thompson D.B. Different spatial scales of natural selection and gene flow: the evolution of behavioural geographic variation and phenotypic plasticity. Foster S.A., Endler J.A. Geographic Variation in Behaviour. 1999;33-51 Oxford University Press, Oxford
47. Tilley S.G., Verrell P.A., Arnold S.J. Correspondence between sexual isolation and allozyme differentiation: a test in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 87:1990;2715-2719
48. Tregenza T., Pritchard V.L., Butlin R.K. The origins of premating isolation: testing hypotheses in the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Evolution. 54:2000;1687-1698
49. Wagner W.E., Hoback W.W. Nutritional effects on male calling behaviour in the variable cricket. Animal Behaviour. 57:1999;89-95
50. Wagner W.E., Murray A.-M., Cade W.H. Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female crickets, Gryllus integer. Animal Behaviour. 49:1995;1269-1281
51. Walker T.J. Factors responsible for intraspecific variation in the calling songs of crickets. Evolution. 16:1962;407-428
52. Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis. 1984;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
53. Zuk M., Simmons L.W., Cupp L. Calling characteristics of parasitized and unparasitized populations of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology. 33:1993;339-343
54. Zuk M., Simmons L.W., Rotenberry J.T. Acoustically-orienting parasitoids in calling and silent males of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Ecological Entomology. 20:1995;380-383
55. Zuk M., Rotenberry J.T., Simmons L.W. Calling songs of field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) with and without phonotactic parasitoid infection. Evolution. 52:1998;166-171
56. Zuk M., Rotenberry J.T., Simons L.W. Geographic variation in calling song of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: the importance of spatial scale. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 14:2001;731-741