Reassembling Scholarly Publishing: Institutional Repositories, Open Access, and The Process of Change

ACIS 2007 Proceedings - 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 436-446

  Kennan, Mary Anne ^a   Cecez Kecmanovic, Dubravka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Actor network theory; Institutional repositories; Open access; Scholarly publishing

Indexed keywords

ACTOR NETWORK THEORY; INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES; LIBRARY STAFF; OPEN ACCESS; OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS; RESEARCH PAPERS; REWARD SYSTEMS; SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

INFORMATION SERVICES;

EID: 84869102728     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Antelman, K 2004, 'Do open-access articles have a greater research impact?' College and Research Libraries, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 373-382.
2. ARROW Australian Repositories Online to the World n.d., About ARROW, viewed 4 December, 2006 http://arrow.edu.au/about/.
3. Australian Department of Education Science and Training (DEST) [2006], About the Higher Education Research DataCollection, viewed 14 September,2006 http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/research_sector/online_forms_services/higher_education_research_data_collection.htm#About_the_Higher_Education_Research_Data_Collection.
4. Australian Department of Education Science and Training. Development Advisory Group of the RQF 2006, The Recommended RQF, Australian Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra.
5. Australian Government Department of Education Science and Training. n.d.-a, Accessibility Framework, viewed 4December, 2006 http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/research_sector/policies_issues_reviews/key_issues/accessibility_framework/.
6. Australian Government Department of Education Science and Training. n.d.-b, Research Quality Framework: Assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia, viewed 4 December,2006 http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/research_sector/policies_issues_reviews/key_issues/research_quality_framework/default.htm.
7. Bjork, BC 2005, 'A lifecycle model of the scientific communication process', Learned Publishing, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 165-176.
8. Budapest Open Access Initiative 2002, Read the Initiative, viewed 7 April, 2006 http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml.
9. Callon, M 1986, 'Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay', in J Law (ed.), Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge?, Routledge, London, pp. 196-233.
10. Dewatripoint, M, Ginsburgh, V, Legros, P, Walckiers, A, Devroey, J-P, Dujardin, M, Vandooren, F, Dubois, P, Foncel, J, Ivaldi, M & Heusse, M-D 2006, Study on the Economic and Technical Evolution of the Scientific Publication Markets in Europe. Final Report. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Brussels.
11. Drott, MC 2006, 'Open Access', Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), no. 40, pp. 79-109.
12. Guédon, J-C 2001, 'In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing', paper presented to Creating the Digital Future, Association of Research Libraries. Proceedings of the 138th Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario May 23-25, 2001.
13. Harnad, S 1995, 'Universal FTP Archives for Esoteric Science and Scholarship: A Subversive Proposal. ' in A Okerson & J O'Donnell (eds), Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads; A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.
14. Harnad, S 1999, 'Free at Last: The Future of Peer-Reviewed Journals.' D-Lib Magazine, vol. 5, no. 12, p.http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad.html.
15. Harnad, S & Brody, T 2004, 'Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. Non-OA articles in the same journals', D-Lib Magazine, vol. 10, no. 6.
16. Harnad, S, Brody, T, Vallieres, F, Carr, L, Hitchcock, S, Gingras, Y, Oppenheim, C, Stamerjohanns, H & Hilf, E 2004, 'The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access. ' Serials Review, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 310-314.
17. Howcroft, D, Mitev, N & Wilson, M 2004, 'What we may learn from the social shaping of technology approach', in J Mingers & L Willocks (eds), Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK.
18. Kingsley, D. 2007 'The one that got away? Institutional reporting changes and open access in Australia preprint available at http://dspace.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/45158 viewed 27 September 2007.
19. Kling, R & Callahan, E 2003, 'Electronic journals, the Internet and scholarly communication', Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), vol. 37, pp. 127-178.
20. Kling, R & McKim, G 1999, 'Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing', Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 890-907.
21. Latour, B 1999, 'On Recalling ANT', in J Law & J Hassard (eds), Actor Network Theory and After, Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review, Oxford, pp. 15-25.
22. Latour, B 2005, Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
23. Law, J 2003, Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity, Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England, viewed 11 July 2006 http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/sociology/papers/law-notes-on-ant.pdf.
24. Law, J 2004, After Method: Mess in Social Science research, Routledge, London.
25. McGrath, K 2002, 'The Golden Circle: a way of arguing and acting about technology in the London Ambulance Service', European Journal Of Information Systems, vol. 11, pp. 251-266.
26. Prosser, DC 2005, 'Fulfilling the Promise of Scholarly Communication - a Comparison Between Old and New Access Models', in EK Nielsen, KG Saur & K Ceynowa (eds), Die innovative Bibliothek: Elmar Mittler zum 65.Geburtstag, K.G. Saur, pp. 95-106.
27. Rowlands, I & Nicholas, D 2006, 'The changing scholarly communication landscape: An international survey of senior researchers', Learned Publishing, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 31-55.
28. Seglen, PO 1997, 'Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research ', British Medical Journal, vol. 314, no. 7079, p. 497.
29. Tatnall, A & Gilding, A 1999, 'Actor-Network Theory and Information Systems Research', paper presented to 10th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Wellington, New Zealand.
30. Tenopir, C & King, DW 2000, Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, Publishers, Special Libraries Association, Washington D.C.
31. Underwood, J 1998, 'Not another methodology: What ANT tells us about systems development', paper presented to 6th International Conference on Information Systems Methodologies, Salford, UK.
32. Underwood, J 2001, 'Meaning in IS Development: Understanding System Requirements and Use with Actor-Network Theory', University of Wollongong.
33. Underwood, J 2001, 'Translation, betrayal and ambiguity in IS development', paper presented to IFIP WG8.1 Working ConferenceonOrganizationalSemiotics,Montreal,July2001, http://linus.socs.uts.edu.au/~jim/publications/montreal2001.doc.
34. Velterop, J 2003, 'Should scholarly societies embrace open access (or is it the kiss of death)? ' Learned Publishing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 167-169.
35. Vidgen, R & McMaster, T 1996, 'Black boxes, non-human stakeholders and the translation of IT through mediation', paper presented to IFIP WG8.2 Working Conference on Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, Cambridge.