Expectations Modulate the Magnitude of Attentional Capture by Auditory Events

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Nöstl, Anatole ^a   Marsh, John E ^a,b   Sörqvist, Patrik ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÄVLE   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^c LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPECTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PITCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84868712214     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048569     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cowan N, Winkler I, Teder W, Näätänen R, (1993) Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 19: 909-921.
2. Parmentier FBR, Elford G, Escera C, Andrés P, SanMiguel I, (2008) The cognitive locus of distraction by auditory novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition 106: 408-432.
3. Escera C, Alho K, Winkler I, Näätänen R, (1998) Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci 10: 590-604.
4. Parmentier FBR, (2008) Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role on involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Cognition 109: 345-362.
5. Schröger E, (2005) The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing. Acta Acust United Ac 91: 490-501.
6. Näätänen R, Winkler I, (1999) The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 125: 826-859.
7. Sörqvist P, Nöstl A, Halin N, (2012) Working memory capacity modulates habituation rate: Evidence from a cross-modal auditory distraction paradigm. Psychon Bull & Rev 19: 245-259.
8. Näätänen R, (1990) The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav and Brain Sci 13: 201-233.
9. Schröger E, (1997) On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology 34: 245-257.
10. Yago E, Corral MJ, Escera C, (2001) Activation of brain mechanisms of attention switching as a function of auditory frequency change. NeuroReport 12: 4093-4097.
11. Corral MJ, Escera C, (2008) Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction. NeuroReport 19: 1535-1539.
12. Jaramillo M, Paavilainen P, Näätänen R, (2000) Mismatch negativity and behavioural discrimination in humans as a function of the magnitude of change in sound duration. Neurosci Lett 290: 101-104.
13. Bendixen A, SanMiguel I, Schröger E, (2012) Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: A review. Int J Psychophysiol 83: 120-131.
14. Hughes RW, Vachon F, Jones DM, (2007) Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: Support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 33: 1050-1061.
15. Nordby H, Roth WT, Pfefferbaum A, (1988) Event-related potentials to breaks in sequences of alternating pitches or interstimulus intervals. Psychophysiology 25: 262-268.
16. Unger SM, (1964) Habituation of the vasoconstrictive orienting reaction. J Exp Psychol 67: 11-18.
17. Bendixen A, Roeber U, Schröger E, (2007) Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. J Cog Neurosci 19: 1664-1677.
18. Schröger E, Bendixen A, Trujillo-Barreto NJ, Roeber U, (2007) Processing of abstract rule violations in audition. PLoS ONE 11: 1-8.
19. van Zuijen T, Sussman E, Winkler I, Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M, (2005) Auditory organization of sound sequences by a temporal or numerical regularity - a mismatch study comparing musicians and nonmusicians. Cogn Brain Res 23: 270-276.
20. Vachon F, Hughes RW, Jones DM (2012) Broken expectations: Violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. doi: 10.1037/a0025054.
21. Parmentier FBR, Elsley JV, Andrés P, Barceló F, (2011) Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition 119: 374-380.
22. Schadow J, Lenz D, Dettler N, Fründ I, Herrmann CS, (2009) Early gamma-band responses reflect anticipatory top-down modulation in the auditory cortex. NeuroImage 47: 651-658.
23. Sams M, Alho K, Näätänen R, (1984) Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP. Psychophysiology 21: 434-441.
24. Cowan N (1995) Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press. 321 p.
25. Hughes RW, Vachon F, Jones DM, (2005) Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: Violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem 31: 736-749.