Auditory organization of sound sequences by a temporal or numerical regularity - A mismatch negativity study comparing musicians and non-musicians

Cognitive Brain Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 270-276

  Van Zuijen, Titia L ^a   Sussman, Elyse ^b   Winkler, István ^c   Näätänen, Risto ^a   Tervaniemi, Mari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Mismatch negativity; Musician; Processing of numerosity; Regularity detection; Temporal processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; MUSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOUND DETECTION;

EID: 16844366668     PISSN: 09266410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. K. Alho Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes Ear Hear. 16 1995 38 51
2. K. Alho, M. Tervaniemi, M. Huotilainen, J. Lavikainen, H. Tiitinen, R.J. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila, and R. Näätänen Processing of complex sounds in the human auditory cortex as revealed by magnetic brain responses Psychophysiology 33 1996 369 375
3. M. Atienza, J.L. Catero, C. Grau, C. Gomez, E. Dominguez-Marin, and C. Escera Effects of temporal encoding on auditory object formation: a mismatch negativity study Cogn. Brain Res. 16 2003 359 371
4. M. Besson, F. Faita, and J. Requin Brain waves associated with musical incongruities differ for musicians and non-musicians Neurosci. Lett. 168 1994 101 105
5. E.M. Burns, and A.J.M. Houtsma The influence of musical training on the perception of sequentially presented mistuned harmonics J. Acad. Soc. Am. 106 1999 3564 3570
6. C. Drake, and M. Botte Tempo sensitivity in auditory sequences: evidence for a multiple-look model Percept. Psychophys. 54 1993 277 286
7. C. Drake, A. Penel, and E. Bigand Tapping in time with mechanically and expressively performed music Music Percept. 18 2000 1 23
8. S. Koelsch, E. Schröger, and M. Tervaniemi Superior attentive and pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians NeuroReport 10 1999 1309 1313
9. G. McCarthy, and C.C. Wood Scalp distribution of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62 1985 203 208
10. E.K. Miller, A. Nieder, D.J. Freedman, and J.D. Wallis Neural correlates of categories and concepts Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13 2003 198 203
11. C. Mizuno, J.L. Schwartz, and Y. Cazals Periodicity of long-term context can influence gap detection Hear. Res. 78 1994 41 48
12. T.F. Münte, C. Kohlmetz, W. Nager, and E. Altenmuller Superior auditory spatial tuning in conductors Nature 409 2001 580
13. R. Näätänen, A.W. Gaillard, and S. Mäntysalo Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted Acta Psychol. 42 1978 313 329
14. R. Näätänen, M. Tervaniemi, E. Sussman, P. Paavilainen, and I. Winkler 'Primitive intelligence' in the auditory cortex Trends Neurosci. 24 2001 283 288
15. H. Nordby, W.T. Roth, and A. Pfefferbaum Event-related potentials to breaks in sequences of alternating pitches or interstimulus intervals Psychophysiology 25 1988 262 268
16. P. Paavilainen, J. Simola, M. Jaramillo, R. Näätänen, and I. Winkler Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) Psychophysiology 38 2001 359 365
17. C. Pantev, R. Oostenveld, A. Engelien, B. Ross, L.E. Roberts, and M. Hoke Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians Nature 23 1998 811 814
18. T.W. Picton, C. Alain, L. Otten, W. Ritter, and A. Achim Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 5 2000 111 139
19. W. Ritter, D. Deacon, H. Gomes, D.C. Javitt, and H.D. Vaughan Jr. The mismatch negativity of event-related potentials as a probe of transient auditory memory: a review Ear Hear. 16 1995 52 67
20. J. Rüsseler, E. Altenmüller, W. Nager, C. Kohlmetz, and T.F. Münte Event-related brain potentials to sound omissions differ in musicians and non-musicians Neurosci. Lett. 308 2001 33 36
21. R.V. Shannon, F.G. Zeng, V. Kamath, J. Wygonski, and M. Ekelid Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues Science 270 1995 303 304
22. E. Sussman, W. Ritter, and H.G. Vaughan Jr. Predictability of stimulus deviance and the mismatch negativity NeuroReport 9 1998 4167 4170
23. E. Sussman, W. Ritter, and H.G. Vaughan Jr. An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials Psychophysiology 36 1999 22 34
24. E. Sussman, I. Winkler, M. Huoutilainen, W. Ritter, and R. Näätänen Top-down effects on the initially stimulus-driven auditory organization Cogn. Brain Res. 13 2002 393 405
25. M. Tervaniemi, M. Rytkönen, E. Schröger, R.J. Ilmoniemi, and R. Näätänen Superior formation of cortical memory traces for melodic patterns in musicians Learn. Mem. 8 2001 295 300
26. L.J. Trainor, R.N. Desjardins, and C. Rockel A comparison of contour and interval processing in musicians and nonmusicians using event-related potentials Aust. J. Psychol. 51 1999 147 153
27. L.J. Trainor, K.L. McDonald, and C. Alain Automatic and controlled processing of melodic contour and interval information measured by electrical brain activity J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14 2003 430 442
28. D.J. van Tasell, S.D. Soli, V.M. Kirby, and G.P. Widin Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82 1987 1152 1161
29. T.L. van Zuijen, E. Sussman, I. Winkler, R. Näätänen, and M. Tervaniemi Grouping of sequential sounds-an event-related potential study comparing musicians and non-musicians J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 2004 331 338