Relevance of the genetic structure of natural populations, and sampling and classification approaches for conservation and use of wild crop relatives: Potato as an example

Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1065-1072

  Camadro, Elsa L ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE MAR DEL PLATA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Accessions; Crop wild relatives; Population genetic structure; Sampling strategies

Indexed keywords

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 84868682226     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/b2012-090     Document Type: Note

References (46)

1. Avise, J.C. 2000. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
2. Bedonni, M.C., and Camadro, E.L. 2009. Morphological and molecular evidence of natural interspecific hybridization in the diploid potato Solanum kurtzianum from Argentina. Botany, 87(1): 78-87. doi:10.1139/B08-116
3. Camadro, E.L., and Masuelli, R.W. 1995. A genetic model for the endosperm balance number (EBN) in wild potato Solanum acaule Bitt. and two related diploid species. Sex. Plant Reprod. 8(5): 283-288. doi:10.1007/BF00229385
4. Camadro, E.L., and Peloquin, S.J. 1981. Cross-incompatibility between two sympatric polyploid Solanum species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60(2): 65-70. doi:10.1007/BF00282417
5. Camadro, E.L., Carputo, D., and Peloquin, S.J. 2004. Substitutes for genome differentiation in tuber-bearing Solanum: interspecific pollen-pistil incompatibility, nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility, and endosperm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109(7): 1369-1376. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1753-2
6. Camadro, E.L., Erazzú, L.E., Maune, J.F., and Bedogni, M.C. 2012. A genetic approach to the species problem in wild potatoes. [Online.] Plant Biol. (Stuttg.), 14(4): 543-554. doi:10.1111/ j.1438-8677.2012.00563.x. PMID:22372767
7. Carputo, D., Camadro, E.L., and Peloquin, S.J. 2006. Terminology for polyploids based on their cytogenetic behavior: consequences in genetics and breeding. In Plant Breeding Reviews. Vol. 26. Edited by J. Janick. John Wiley and Sons, London. pp. 105-124
8. Charlesworth, D. 2003. Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 358(1434): 1051-1070. doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1296
9. Correll, D.S. 1962. The potato and its wild relatives. Texas Research Foundation, Renner, Tex
10. Crow, J.F., and Kimura, M. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis, Minnesota
11. Davies, C.S., Ottman, M.J., and Peloquin, S.J. 2002. Can germplasm resources be used to increase the ascorbic acid content of stored potatoes? Am. J. Potato Res. 79(4): 295-299. doi:10.1007/ BF02986362
12. Ehlenfeldt, M.K., and Hanneman, R.E. 1988. Genetic control of endosperm balance number (EBN): three additive loci in a threshold-like system. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75(6): 825-832
13. Erazzú, L.E., Camadro, E.L., and Clausen, A.M. 2009. Persistence over time, overlapping distribution and molecular indications of interspecific hybridization in wild potato populations of Northwest Argentina. Euphytica, 168(2): 249-262
14. Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 3rd ed. Longmans Green / John Wiley & Sons, Harlow, Essex, UK, and New York
15. Frankel, R., and Galun, E. 1977. Pollination mechanisms, reproduction and plant breeding. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
16. Grant, V. 1981. Plant speciation. 2nd ed. Columbia. University Press, New York
17. Hanneman, R.E., Jr. 1999. The reproductive biology of the potato and its implication in breeding. Potato Res. 42(2): 283-312. doi: 10.1007/BF02357859
18. Hawkes, J.G. 1944. Potato collecting expeditions in Mexico and South America. II. Systematic classification of the collections. Bulletin of the Imperial Bureau of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cambridge, Mass
19. Hawkes, J.G. 1963. A revision of the tuber-bearing Solanums. 2nd ed. Scottish Plant Breeding Station Records, Pentlandfield, UK
20. Hawkes, J.G. 1990. The potato: evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources. Belhaven Press, London
21. Hawkes, J.G., and Hjerting, J.P. 1969. The potatoes of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. A biosystematic study. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
22. Hijmans, R.J., and Spooner, D.M. 2001. Geographic distribution of wild potato species. Am. J. Bot. 88(11): 2101-2112. doi:10.2307/ 3558435
23. Huamán, Z., Hoekstra, R., and Bamberg, J.B. 2000. The intergenebank potato database and the dimensions of available wild potato germplasm. Am. J. Potato Res. 77(6): 353-362. doi: 10.1007/BF02882289
24. Jansky, S.H., and Peloquin, S.J. 2006. Advantages of wild diploid Solanum species over cultivated diploid relatives in potato breeding programs. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 53(4): 669-674. doi: 10.1007/s10722-004-2949-7
25. Johnston, S.A., and Hanneman, R.E., Jr. 1996. Genetic control of endosperm balance number (EBN) in the Solanaceae based on trisomic and mutation analysis. Genome, 39(2): 314-321. doi: 10.1139/g96-042
26. Magoon, M.L., Ramanujam, S., and Cooper, D.C. 1962. Cytogenetical studies in realtion to the origin and differentiation of species in the genus Solanum. Caryologia, 15(1): 155-252
27. Masuelli, R.W., Camadro, E.L., Erazzú, L.E., Bedogni, M.C., and Marfil, C.F. 2009. Homoploid hybridization in the origin and evolution of wild diploid potato species. Plant Syst. Evol. 277(3-4): 143-151. doi:10.1007/s00606-008-0116-x
28. Matsubayashi, M. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships in the potato and its related species. In Chromosome engineering in plants: genetics, breeding, evolution. Part B. Edited by T. Tsuchiya and P.K. Gupta. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 93-118
29. Mayr, E. 2000. What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Mass
30. Mendiburu, A.O., Peloquin, S.J., and Mok, D.W.S. 1974. Potato breeding with haploids and 2n gametes. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Haploids in Higher Plants. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. pp. 249-258
31. Mok, D.W.S., and Peloquin, S.J. 1975. Three mechanisms of 2n pollen formation in diploid potatoes. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 17: 217-225
32. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70(12): 3321-3323. doi:10.1073/ pnas.70.12.3321
33. Oltmans, S.M., and Novy, R.G. 2002. Identification of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) haploid _ wild species hybrids with the capacity to cold-chip. Am. J. Potato Res. 79(4): 263-268. doi: 10.1007/BF02986359
34. Ortiz, R. 2010. Potato breeding via ploidy manipulations. In Plant breeding reviews. Vol. 16. Edited by J. Janick. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Oxford, UK
35. Peloquin, S.J., and Hougas, R.W. 1959. Decapitation and genetic markers as related to haploidy in Solanum tuberosum. Eur. Potato J. 2(3): 176-183. doi:10.1007/BF02365563
36. Rieger, R., Michaelis, A., and Green, M.M. 1991. A glossary of genetics, classical and molecular. 5th ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. [In English.]
37. Ross, H. 1986. Potato breeding-problems and perspectives. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Hamburg
38. Santini, M., Camadro, E.L., Marcellán, O.N., and Erazzú, L.E. 2000. Agronomic characterization of diploid hybrid families derived from crosses between haploids of the common potato and three wild Argentinian tuber-bearing species. Am. J. Potato Res. 77(4): 211-218. doi:10.1007/BF02855788
39. Schoen, D.J., and Brown, A.H.D. 1991. Intraspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88(10): 4494-4497. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.10.4494
40. Spooner, D.M. 2009. DNA barcoding will frequently fail in complicated groups: an example in wild potatoes. Am. J. Bot. 96(6): 1177-1189. doi:10.3732/ajb.0800246
41. Spooner, D.M., and Salas, A. 2006. Structure, biosystematics, and genetic resources. In Handbook of potato production, improvement, and post-harvest management. Edited by G.J. Khuranam and S.M. Paul. Haworth Press, New York. pp. 1-39
42. Taylor, S.J., Arnold, M.L., and Martin, N.H. 2009. The genetic architecture of reproduction isolation in Louisina irises: hybrid fitness in nature. Evolution, 63(10): 2581-2594. doi:10.1111/ j.1558-5646.2009.00742.x
43. van Berloo, R., Hutten, R.C.B., van Eck, H.J., and Visser, R.G.F. 2007. An online potato pedigree database resource. Potato Res. 50(1): 45-57
44. Ugent, D. 1966. Hybrid weed complexes in Solanum, section Tuberarium. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc
45. Walther-Hellwig, K., and Frankl, R. 2000. Foraging distances of Bombus muscorum, Bombus lapidarius, and Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera, Apidae). J. Insect Behav. 13(2): 239-246. doi: 10.1023/A:1007740315207
46. Will, K.W., and Rubinoff, D. 2004. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics, 20(1): 47-55. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.00008.x.