The reproductive biology of the potato and its implication for breeding

Potato Research

Volumn 42, Issue SPEC. ISS., 1999, Pages 283-312

  Hanneman Jr , R E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

2n gametes; EBN; Endosperm Balance Number; Imprinting; Interspecific hybridization; Introgression; Solanum spp.; Stylar barriers; Synaptic mutants

Indexed keywords

DISOMY; GAMETE; GENE TRANSFER; GENETIC INCOMPATIBILITY; GERMPLASM; HAPLOIDY; INTERPLOIDY; PLANT BREEDING; POTATO; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; SEED DEVELOPMENT;

EMBRYOPHYTA; SOLANUM; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 6744236266     PISSN: 00143065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02357859     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (213)

1. Abdalla, M.M.F., 1970. Inbreeding, heterosis, fertility, plasmon differentiation and Phytophtora resistance in Solanum verrucosum Schlechtd., and some interspecific crosses in Solanum. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Agricultural Research Report 748, 213 pp.
2. Abdalla, M.M.F. & J.G.Th. Hermsen, 1972. Unilateral incompatibility: Hypotheses, debate and its implications for plant breeding. Euphytica 21: 32-47.
3. Adiwilaga, K. & C.R. Brown, 1991. Use of 2n pollen-producing triploid hybrids to introduce tetraploid Mexican wild species germplasm to cultivated tetraploid potato gene pool. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 81: 645-662.
4. Anderson, M.A., E.C. Cornish, S. L. Mau, E.G. Williams, R. Hoggart, A. Atkinson, I. Bonig, B. Grego, R. Simpson, P.J. Roche, J.D. Haley, J.D. Penschow, H.D. Niall, G.W. Tregear, J.P. Coghlan, R.J. Crawford & A.E. Clarke, 1986. Cloning of cDNA for a stylar glycoprotein associated with expression of self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata. Nature 321: 38-44.
5. Anonymous, 1984. Potatoes for the developing world. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru, 148 pp.
6. Arisumi, T., 1982. Endosperm Balance Numbers among New Guinea Indonesian Impatiens species. Journal of Heredity 73: 240-242.
7. Arnason, T.J., 1943. Female sterility in potatoes. Canadian Journal of Research 21: 41-56.
8. Ascher, P.D. & S.J. Peloquin, 1968. Pollen tube growth and incompatibility following intra- and inter-specific pollinations in Lilium longiflorum. American Journal of Botany 55: 1230-1234.
9. Avery, A.G., S. Satina & J. Rietsema, 1959. Blakeslee: The Genus Datum. Ronald Press, New York, 289 pp.
10. Bamberg, J.B., 1994. Allelism of endosperm balance number (EBN) in Solanum acaule Bitt. and other wild potato species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 682-686.
11. Bamberg, J.B. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1990. Allelism of Endosperm Balance Number (EBN) in Mexican tuber-bearing Solanum species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80: 161-166.
12. Bamberg, J.B., R.E. Hanneman, Jr, J.P. Palta & J.F. Harbage, 1994. Using disomic 4x(2EBN) potato species germplasm via bridge species Solanum commersonii. Genome 37: 866-870.
13. Beamish, K.I., 1955. Seed failure following hybridization between the hexaploid Solanum demissum and four diploid Solanum species. American Journal of Botany 42: 297-304.
14. Beck, C.B., 1976. Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Columbia University Press, New York, 341 pp.
15. Bernatzky, R. & S.D. Tanksley. 1986. Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics 112: 887-898.
16. Birchler, J.A., 1993. Dosage analysis of maize endosperm development. Annual Review of Genetics 27: 181-204.
17. Birhman, R.K. & K.C. Garg, 1989. Yield and yield components of meiotic tetraploids of potato. Potato Research 32: 457-462.
18. Bonierbale, M.W., R.L. Plaisted & S.D. Tanksley, 1988. RFLP maps based on a common set of clones reveal modes of chromosome evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics 120: 1095-1103.
19. Breukelen, E.W.M. van, M.S. Ramanna & J.G.Th. Hermsen, 1975. Monohaploids (n=x=12) from autotetraploid Solanum tuberosum (2n=4x=48) through two successive cycles of female parthenogenesis. Euphytica 24: 567-574.
20. Breukelen, E.W.M. van, M.S. Ramanna & J.G.Th. Hermsen, 1977. Parthenogenetic monoploids (2n=x=12) from Solanum tuberosum L. and S. verrucosum Schlechtd, and the production of homozygous potato diploids. Euphytica 26: 263-271.
21. Brewbaker, J.L. & S.K. Majumder. 1961. Cultural studies of the pollen population effect and the self-incompatibility inhibition. American Journal of Botany 48: 457-464.
22. Brink, R.A., 1925. Mendelian ratios and the gametophyte generation in angiosperms. Genetics 10: 359-394.
23. Brink, R.A. & D.C. Cooper, 1947. The endosperm in seed development. Botanical Review 13: 423-541.
24. Brown, C.R. & K. Adiwilaga, 1990. Introgression of Solanum acaule germplasm from the endosperm balance number 2 gene pool into the cultivated endosperm balance number 4 potato gene pool via triplandroids. Genome 33: 273-278.
25. Budin, K.Z. & T. A. Gavrilenko, 1994. Genetic bases of remote hybridization in potato. Russian Journal of Genetics 30: 1188-1196.
26. Buso, J.A., 1986. Evaluations of families and clones from the 4x × 2x breeding scheme in potato. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 211 pp.
27. Buso, J.A., F.J.B. Reifschneider, L.S. Boiteux & S.J. Peloquin, 1999. Effects of 2n-pollen formation by first meiotic division restitution with and without crossover on eight quantitative traits in 4x-2x potato progenies. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 1311-1319.
28. Camadro, E.L. & J.C. Espinillo, 1990. Germplasm transfer from the wild tetraploid species Solanum acaule Bitt. to the cultivated potato, S. tuberosum L. using 2n eggs. American Potato Journal 67:737-749.
29. Camadro, E.L. & R.W. Masuelli, 1995. A genetic model for the Endosperm Balance Number (EBN) in the wild potato S. acaule Bill, and two related diploid species. Sexual Plant Reproduction 8: 283-288.
30. Camadro, E.L., R.W. Masuelli & M.C. Cortes, 1992. Haploids of the wild tetraploid potato Solanum acaule ssp acaule: generation, meiotic behavior, and electrophoretic pattern for the aspartate aminotransferase system. Genome 35: 431-435.
31. Camadro, E.L. & S.J. Peloquin, 1980. Origin of polyploid wild potatoes via genetically determined 2n gametes. American Potato Journal 57: 473 (Abstract).
32. Camadro, E.L. & S.J. Peloquin, 1981. Cross-incompatibility between two sympatric polyploid Solanum species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 60: 65-70.
33. Carputo, D., 1999. Post-zygotic gametic selection due to endosperm balance number explains unusual chromosome numbers of 3x × 2x progeny in Solanum. Sexual Plant Reproduction 12: 27-31.
34. Carputo, D., A. Barone, T. Cardi, A. Sebastiano, L. Frusciante & S.J. Peloquin, 1997. Endosperm Balance Number manipulation for direct in vivo germplasm introgression to potato form a sexually isolated relative (Solanum commersonii Dun.). Proceedings National Academy of Sciences (USA) 94 (22): 12013-12017.
35. Carputo, D., L. Monti, J.E. Werner & L. Frusciante, 1999. Uses and usefulness of endosperm balance number. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 478-484.
36. Chase, S.S., 1963. Analytic breeding in Solanum tuberosum L. - a scheme utilizing parthenotes and other diploid stocks. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 5: 359-363.
37. Chetelat, R.T. & J.W. DeVerna, 1991. Expression of unilateral incompatibility in pollen of Lycopersicon pennelli is determined by major loci on chromosomes 1, 6, and 10. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 82: 794-712.
38. Choudhuri, H.C., 1944. Cytological and genetical studies in the genus Solanum. II. Wild and native cultivated "diploid" potatoes. Transactions of the Royal Society Edinburgh 61: 199-219.
39. Chujoy, J.E., 1985. Tuber yields of 2x and 4x progeny from 2x × 2x crosses in potato; barriers to interspecific hybridization between Solanum chacoense Bitt. and S. commersonii Dun. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 129 pp.
40. Clausen, R.E. & D.R. Cameron, 1950. Inheritance in Nicotiana tabacum: XXIII. Duplicate factors for chlorophyll production. Genetics 35: 4-10.
41. Concilio, L., 1987. Evaluation of the tetraploid × diploid (4x × 2x) mating scheme and its efficiency in a new breeding program. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 146 pp.
42. Concilio, L., 1992. Morphological variability of potato haploids (2n=2x=24) extracted from a broad genetic base population. Journal of Genetics and Breeding 46: 35-40.
43. Cooper, D.C., 1951. Caryopsis development following matings between diploid and tetraploid strains of Zea mays. American Journal of Botany 38: 702-788.
44. Cooper, D.C. & R.A. Brink, 1945. Seed collapse following matings between diploid and tetraploid races of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Genetics 30: 376-401.
45. Cruden, R.W. & D.L. Lyon, 1985. Correlations among stigma depth, style length and pollen grain size: do they reflect function or phylogeny? Botanical Gazette 140: 143-149.
46. Darmo, E. & S.J. Peloquin, 1991. Use of 2x Tuberosum haploid-wild species hybrids to improve yield and quality in 4x cultivated potato. Euphytica 53: 1-9.
47. DeJong, H., G.C.C. Tai, W.A. Russell, & K.G. Proudfoot, 1981. Yield potential and genotype-environment interactions of tetraploid-diploid (4x-2x) potato hybrids. American Potato Journal 58: 191-199.
48. De,Maine, M.J., 1994. The ploidy composition of offspring from Solanum tuberosum (4x) × S. phureja (2x) crosses with special reference to triploid frequencies. Annals of Applied Biology 125: 361-366.
49. Dickinson, H.G. & J. Lawson, 1975. Pollen tube growth in the stigma of Oenothera organensis following compatible and incompatible intra-specific pollinations. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 188: 327-344.
50. Dionne, L.A., 1961. Mechanisms of interspecific incompatibility in tuber-bearing Solanum species. American Potato Journal 38: 73-77.
51. Dionne, L.A., 1963. Studies on the use of Solanum acaule as a bridge between Solanum tuberosum and species in the series Bulbocastana, Cardiophylla and Pinnatisecta. Euphytica 12: 263-269.
52. Dodd, J.B., 1990. The form and function of EBN-mediated reproductive isolation in the tuber-bearing Solanum species. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 153 pp.
53. Dumas, C. & R.B. Knox, 1983. Callose and determination of pollen viability and incompatibility. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 67: 1-10.
54. Ehlenfeldt, M.K. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1984. The use of Endosperm Balance Number and 2n gametes to transfer exotic germplasm in potato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 68: 155-161.
55. Ehlenfeldt, M.K. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1988a. Genetic control of Endosperm Balance Number (EBN): Three additive loci in a threshold-like system. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 75: 825-832.
56. Ehlenfeldt, M.K. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1988b. The transfer of the synaptic gene (sy-2) from 1EBN Solanum commersonii Dun. To 2EBN germplasm. Euphytica 37: 181-187.
57. Ehlenfeldt, M.K. & R. Ortiz, 1995. Evidence on the nature and origins of endosperm dosage requirements in Solanum and other angiosperm genera. Sexual Plant Reproduction 8: 189-196.
58. Eijlander, R., 1998. Mechanisms of self-incompatibility and unilateral incompatibility in diploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, 112 pp.
59. Friedman, W.E., 1992. Evidence of a pre-Angiosperm origin of endosperm: Implications for the evolution of flowering plants. Science 255: 336-339.
60. Friedman, W.E., 1998. The evolution of double fertilization and endosperm : an "historical" perspective. Sexual Plant Reproduction 11: 6-16.
61. Fritz, N.K. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1989. Interspecific incompatibility due to stylar barriers in tuber-bearing and closely related non-tuber-bearing Solanums. Sexual Plant Reproduction 2: 184-192.
62. Garcia-Olmeda, F., P. Carbonero, C. Arancillo & G. Salcedo, 1978. Loss of redundant gene expression after polyploidization in plants. Experientia 34: 332-333.
63. Gell, P.G.H, J.G. Hawkes & S.T.C. Wright, 1960. The application of immunological methods to the taxonomy of species within the genus Solanum. Proceedings of the Royal Society 5B 151: 364-383.
64. Gill, B.S. & J.C. Waines, 1978. Paternal regulation of seed development in wheat hybrids. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 51: 265-270.
65. Grant, V., 1981. Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New York, 563 pp.
66. Grun, P., 1961. Early stages in the formation of internal barriers to gene exchange between diploids species of Solanum. American Journal of Botany 48: 79-89.
67. Grun, P. & M. Aubertin, 1966. The inheritance and expression of unilateral incompatibility in Solanum. Heredity 21: 131-138.
68. Grun, P. & A. Radlow, 1961. Evolution of barriers to crossing of self-incompatible with self-compatible species of Solanum. Heredity 16: 137-143.
69. Haig, D. & M. Westoby, 1991. Genomic imprinting in endopsperm: its effect on seed development in crosses between species, and between different ploidies of the same species, and its implications for the evolution of apomixis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 333: 1-13.
70. Hanneman, R.E., Jr, 1994. Assignment of Endosperm Balance Numbers to the tuber-bearing Solanums and their close non-tuber-bearing relatives. Euphytica 74: 19-25.
71. Hanneman, R.E., Jr & J.B. Bamberg, 1986. Inventory of tuber-bearing species. Wisconsin Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin 533: 216 pp.
72. Hanneman, R.E., Jr & S.J. Peloquin, 1967. Crossability of 24 chromosome potato hybrids with 48-chromosome cultivars. European Potato Journal 10: 62-73.
73. Hanneman, R.E., Jr. & S.J. Peloquin, 1968. Ploidy levels of progeny from diploid-tetraploid crosses in the potato. American Potato Journal 45: 255-261.
74. Hanneman, R.E., Jr. & R.W. Ruhde, 1978. Haploid extraction in Solanum tuberosum Group Andigena. American Potato Journal 55: 259-263.
75. Hawkes, J.G., 1958. Kartoffel. 1. Taxonomy, cytology and crossability. In: H. Kappert & W. Rudorf (Eds), Handbuch der Pflanzenzuchtung Vol 3. Paul Parey, Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany, p. 1-43.
76. Hawkes, J.G., 1990. The Potato: Evolution, Biodiversity and Genetic Resources. Belhaven Press, London and Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, D.C., 259 pp.
77. Hawkes, J.G. & M.T. Jackson, 1992. Taxonomic and evolutionary implications of the Endosperm Balance Number hypothesis in potatoes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 84: 180-185.
78. Helentjaris, T., D. Weber & S. Wright, 1988. Identification of the genomic locations of duplicate nucleotide sequences in maize by analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Genetics 118: 353-363.
79. Hermsen, J.G.Th., 1966. Crossability, fertility and cytogenetic studies in Solanum acaule × Solanum bulbocastanum. Euphytica 15: 149-155.
80. Hermsen, J.G.Th., 1978. Factors controlling interspecific crossability and their bearing on the strategy for breaking barriers to intercrossing of tuber-bearing Solanum species. In: A.C. Zeven & A.M. van Harten (Eds), Proceedings Conference Broadening Genetic Base Crops, Wageningen, p. 311-318.
81. Hermsen, J.G.Th., 1984. Mechanisms and implications of 2n gamete formation. Iowa State Journal of Research 58: 421-434.
82. Hermundstad, S.A. & S.J. Peloquin, 1985. Germplasm enhancement with potato haploids. Journal of Heredity 76:463-467.
83. Hermundstad, S.A. & S.J. Peloquin, 1987. Breeding at the 2x level and sexual polyploidization. In: G.J. Jellis & D.E. Richardson (Eds), The production of New Potato Varieties: Technological Advances. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, p. 197-210.
84. Herrero, M. & H.G. Dickinson, 1979. Pollen-pistil incompatibility in Petunia hybrida; changes in the pistil following compatible and incompatible intraspecific crosses. Journal of Cell Science 36: 1-18.
85. Herrero, M. & H.G. Dickinson, 1981. Pollen tube development in Petunia hybrids following compatible and incompatible intraspecific matings. Journal of Cell Science 47: 365-383.
86. Hogenboom, N.G., 1973. A model for incongruity in intimate partner relationships. Euphytica 22: 219-233.
87. Hogenboom, N.G., 1975. Incompatibility and incongruity: two different mechanisms for the non-functioning of intimate partner relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 188: 361-375.
88. Hogenboom, N.G., 1979. Incompatibility and incongruity in Lycopersicon. In: J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester & A.D. Skelding (Eds), The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press, London, p. 435-444.
89. Hogenboom, N.G., 1984. Incongruity: Non-functioning of intercellular and intracellular partner relationships through non-matching information. In: H.F. Linskens & J. Heslop-Harrison (Eds). Cellular Interactions: Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. New Series vol. 17, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 640-654.
90. Hougas, R.W., S.J. Peloquin & A.C. Gabert, 1964. Effect of seed-parent and pollinator on frequency of haploids in Solanum tuberosum. Crop Science 4: 593-597.
91. Hougas, R.W., S.J. Peloquin & R.W. Ross, 1958. Haploids of the common potato. Journal of Heredity 47: 103-107.
92. Hutten, R.C.B., M.G.M. Schippers, J.G.Th. Hermsen & E. Jacobsen. 1995. Comparative performance of diploid and tetraploid progenies from 2x × 2x crosses in potato. Euphytica 81: 187-192.
93. Hutten, R.C.B., M.G.M. Schippers, J.G.Th. Hermsen & M.S. Ramanna. 1994. Comparatve performance of FDR and SDR progenies from reciprocal 4x-2x crosses in potato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 545-550.
94. Hutten, R.C.B., W.J.J. Soppe, J.G.Th. Hermsen & E. Jacobsen, 1995. Evaluation of dihaploid populations from potato varieties and breeding lines. Potato Research 38: 77-86.
95. Irikura, Y., 1968. Studies on interspecific crosses of tuber-bearing Solanums. 1. Overcoming cross-incompatibility between Solanum tuberosum and other Solanum species by means of induced polyploids and haploids. Hokkaido National Agricultural Experimental Station Research Bulletin 92: 21-37.
96. Irikura, Y., 1975. Induction of haploid plants by anther culture in tuber-bearing species and interspecific hybrids oi Solanum. Potato Research 18: 133-140.
97. Iwanaga, M., 1984. Discovery of a synaptic mutant in potato haploids and its usefulness for potato breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 68: 87-93.
98. Iwanaga, M. & S.J. Peloquin, 1979. Synaptic mutant affecting only megasporogenesis in potatoes. Journal of Heredity 70: 385-389.
99. Jackson, S.A. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1999. Crossability between cultivated and wild tuber- and non-tuber-bearing Solanums. Euphytica (in press).
100. Johnston, S.A., 1980. The role and nature of genie balances in endosperm development. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 157 pp.
101. Johnston, S.A. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1980. Support of the Endosperm Balance Number hypothesis utilizing some tuber-bearing Solanum species. American Potato Journal 57: 7-14.
102. Johnston, S.A. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1982. Manipulations of Endosperm Balance Number overcome crossing barriers between diploid Solanum species. Science 217: 446-448.
103. Johnston, S.A. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1995. The genetics of triploid formation and its relationship to endosperm balance number in potato. Genome 38: 60-67.
104. Johnson, S.A. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1996. Genetic control of Endosperm Balance Number (BEN) in Solanaceae based on trisomie and mutation analysis. Genome 39: 314-321.
105. Johnston, S.A. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1999. The nature of the genetic control of Endosperm Balance Number based on aneuploid analysis of Datura. Sexual Plant Reproduction (in press).
106. Johnston, S.A., T.P.M. den Nijs, S.J. Peloquin & R.E. Hanneman, Jr. 1980. The significance of genic balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 51: 5-9.
107. Johnston, S.A., R.W. Ruhde, M.K. Ehlenfeldt & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1986. Inheritance and microsporogenesis of a synaptic mutant (sy-2) from Solanum commersonii Dun. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 28: 520-524.
108. Jongedijk, K.E. & M.S. Ramanna, 1988. Synaptic mutants in potato. Solanum tuberosum L. I. Expression and identity of genes for desynapsis. Genome 30: 664-670.
109. 1 (desynapsis) mutants of diploid potato: routine production of tetraploid progeny from 2x FDR × 2x FDR Crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 82: 645-656.
110. Katsiotis, A., R.E. Hanneman, Jr & R. A. Forsberg, 1995. Endosperm Balance Number and the polar-nuclei activation hypotheses for endosperm development in interspecific crosses of Solanaceae and Gramineae, respectively. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 848-855.
111. Kermicle, J.L., 1971. Pleiotropic effects on seed development of the indeterminate gametophyte gene in maize. American Journal of Botany 58: 1-7.
112. Kermicle, J.L., 1978. Imprinting of gene action in maize endosperm. In: D.B. Walden (Ed.), Maize Breeding and Genetics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 357-371.
113. Kermicle, J.L., 1996. Epigenetic silencing and activation of a maize r gene. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, p. 267-287.
114. Kermicle, J.L. & M. Alleman, 1990. Gametic imprinting in maize in relation to the angiosperm life cycle. Development (suppl.): 9-14.
115. Lee, J.H. & D.C. Cooper, 1958. Seed development following hybridization between diploid Solanum species from Mexico, Central and South America. American Journal of Botany 45: 104-110.
116. Leidl, B.E. & N.O. Anderson, 1993. Reproductive barriers: Identification, uses and circumvention. Plant Breeding Reviews 11: 11-154.
117. Lesins, K., 1961. Interspecific crosses involving alfalfa. I. Medicago dzhawakhetica (Bordz.) Vass. × M. sativa L. and its peculiarities. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 3: 135-152.
118. Leue, E.F. & S.J. Peloquin, 1980. Selection for 2n gametes and tuberization in Solanum chacoense. American Potato Journal 51: 189-195.
119. Lewis, D. & L.K. Crowe, 1958. Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12: 233-256.
120. Lin, B.-Y., 1975. Parental effects on gene expression in maize endosperm development. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 190 pp.
121. Lin, B.-Y., 1984. Ploidy barrier to endosperm development in maize. Genetics 107: 103-115.
122. Lopes, M.A. & B.A. Larkins, 1993. Endosperm origin, development, and function. Plant Cell 5: 1383-1399.
123. Malheiros-Garde, N., 1959a. Mechanisms of species isolation in tuberous Solanum. Agronomia Lusitana 211: 19-42.
124. Malheiros-Garde, N., 1959b. Fertilization and seed development in some crosses between diploid species of the genus Solanum. Agronomia Lusitana 21: 91-102.
125. Marks, G.E., 1966a. The origin and significance of intraspecific polyploid: experimental evidence from Solanum chacoense. Evolution 20: 552-557.
126. Marks, G.E., 1966b. The enigma of triploid potatoes. Euphytica 15: 285-290.
127. Martin, F.W., 1961. The inheritance of self-incompatibility in hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. × L. chilense Dun. Genetics 46: 1443-1454.
128. Martin, F.W., 1964. The inheritance of unilateral incompatibility in Lycopersicon hirsutim. Genetics 50: 459-469.
129. Martin, F.W., 1968. The behavior of Lycopersicon incompatibility alleles in an alien genetic milieu. Genetics 60: 101-109.
130. Masson, M.F. & S.J. Peloquin, 1987. Heterosis for tuber yields and total solids content in 4x × 2x FDR-CO crosses in potato. In: G.J. Jellis & D.E. Richardson (Eds), The Production of New Potato Varieties: Technological Advances. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, England, p. 213-217.
131. Masuelli, R.W. & E.L. Camadro, 1997. Crossability relationships among wild potato species with different ploidies and Endosperm Balance Numbers (EBN). Euphytica 94: 227-235.
132. Mather, K., 1943. Specific differences in Petunia I. Incompatibility. Journal of Genetics 45: 215-235.
133. Matsubayashi, M., 1982. Species differentiation in Solanum sect. Petota. XI. Genomic relationships between S. acaule and certain diploid Commersoniana species. Science Report of the Faculty of Agriculture Kobe University 15: 23-33.
134. McHale, N.A. & F.I. Lauer, 1981. Breeding value of 2n pollen diploid from hybrids and Phureja in 4x-2x crosses in potatoes. American Potato Journal 58: 365-374.
135. Mendiburu, A.O. & S.J. Peloquin, 1976. Sexual polyploidization and depolyploidization: Some terminology and definitions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 48: 137-143.
136. Mendiburu, A.O. & S.J. Peloquin. 1977a. The significance of 2n gametes in potato breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 49: 53-61.
137. Mendiburu, A.O. & S.J. Peloquin, 1977b. Bilateral sexual polyploidization in potatoes. Euphytica 26: 573-583.
138. Mendiburu, A.O., S.J. Peloquin & D.W.S. Mok, 1974. Potato breeding with haploids and 2n gametes. In: K.J. Kasha (Ed.), Haploids in Higher Plants. Guelph University Press, Guelph, Canada, p. 249-258.
139. Mok, D.W.S. & S.J. Peloquin. 1975a. Three mechanisms of 2n pollen formation in diploid potatoes. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 17: 217-225.
140. Mok, D.W.S. & S.J. Peloquin, 1975b. The inheritance of three mechanisms and diplandroid (2n pollen) formation in diploid potatoes. Heredity 35: 295-302.
141. Mok, D.W.S. & S.J. Peloquin, 1975c. Breeding value of 2n pollen (diplandroids) in 4x-2x crosses in potatoes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 46: 307-314.
142. Montelongo-Escobedo, H. & P.R. Rowe, 1969. Haploid induction in potato: cytological basis for pollinator effect. Euphytica 18: 116-123.
143. Muntzing, A., 1930. Über Chromosomenvermehrung in Galeopsis - Kreuzungen und ihre phylogenetische Bedeutung. Hereditas 14: 153-172.
144. Murfett, J., T.J. Strabala, D.M. Zurek, B. Mou, B. Beecher & B.A. McClure, 1996. S Rnase and interspecific pollen rejection in the genus Nicotiana: Multiple pollen-rejection pathways contribute to unilateral incompatibility between self-incompatible species. Plant Cell 8: 943-958.
145. Mutschler, M.A. & B.A. Leidl, 1994. Interspecific crossing barriers in Lycopersicon and their relationship to self-incompatibility. In: E.G. Williams, A.E. Clarke & R.B. Knox (Eds), Genetic Control of Self Incompatibility and Reproductive Development in Flowering Plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p. 164-188.
146. Nasrallah, J.B., T.H. Kao, M.L. Goldberg & M.E. Nasrallah, 1985. A cDNA clone encoding an S-locus-specific glycoprotein from Brassica oleracea. Nature 318: 263-267.
147. Nettancourt, D. de, 1977. Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 230 pp.
148. Nettancourt, D. de, 1997. Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Sexual Plant Reproduction 10: 185-199.
149. Nettancourt, D. de, M. Devreux, A. Bozzini, M. Cresti, E. Pacini & G.S. Sarfatti, 1973. Ultrastructural aspects of the self-incompatibility mechanism in Lycopersicon peruvianum Mill. Journal of Cell Science 12: 408-419.
150. Nettancourt, D. de, M. Devreux. U. Laneri, M. Cresti, E. Pacini & G.S. Sarfatti, 1974. Genetical and ultrastructural aspects of self and cross incompatibility in interspecific hybrids between self-compatible Lycopersicon esculentum and self-incompatible L. peruvianum Theoretical and Applied Genetics 44: 278-288.
151. Nijs, P.M. den & S.J. Peloquin, 1977a. 2n gametes in potato species and their function in sexual polyploidization. Euphytica 26: 585-600.
152. Nijs, P.M. den & S.J. Peloquin, 1977b. Polyploid evolution via 2n gametes. American Potato Journal 54: 377-386.
153. Nishiyama, I., 1985. Activating values of male and female gametes, and their interaction in double fertilization. Japanese Journal of Genetics 60: 620 (Abstract, in Japanese).
154. Nishiyama, I. & N. Inomata, 1966. Embryological studies in cross incompatibility between 2x and 4x in Brassica. Japanese Journal of Genetics 41: 27-42.
155. Nishiyama, I. & T. Yabuno, 1978. Causal relationships between the polar nuclei in double fertilization and interspecific cross-incompatibility inAvena. Cytologia 43:453-466.
156. Nishiyama, I. & T. Yabuno, 1979. Triple fusion of the primary endosperm nucleus as a cause of interspecific cross-incompatibility in Avena. Euphytica 28: 57-65.
157. Novy, R.G. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1991. Hybridization between Gp. Tuberosum haploids and 1EBN wild potato species. American Potato Journal 63: 151-169.
158. Ochoa, C.M., 1992. Determinations of chromosome number (2n) and Endosperm Balance Number (EBN) in some little known tuber-bearing Solanum. Phytologia 73(3): 180-182.
159. Okwuagwu, C.O. & S.J. Peloquin, 1981. A method of transferring the intact parental genotype to the offspring via meiotic mutants. American Potato Journal 58: 512-513 (Abstract).
160. Ortiz, R., 1998. Potato breeding via ploidy manipulations. Plant Breeding Reviews 16: 15-86.
161. Ortiz, R. & M.K. Ehlenfeldt, 1992. The importance of Endosperm Balance Number in potato breeding and the evolution of tuber-bearing Solanum species. Euphytica 60: 105-113.
162. Ortiz, R., S.J. Peloquin, R. Freyre & M. Iwanaga, 1991. Efficiency of potato breeding using FDR 2n gametes for multitrait selection and progeny testing. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 82: 602-608.
163. Pandey, K.K., 1962. Interspecific incompatibility in Solanum species. American Journal of Botany 49: 874-882.
164. Pandey, K.K., 1968. Colchicine-induced changes in the self-incompatibility behavior of Nicotiana. Genetica 39: 257-271.
165. Pandey, K.K., 1973. Phases in the S-gene expression, and S-allele interaction in the control of interspecific incompatibility. Heredity 31: 381-400.
166. Peloquin, S.J., 1981. Chromosomal and cytoplasmic manipulations. In: K.J. Frey (Ed.), Plant Breeding II. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, p. 117-150.
167. Peloquin, S.J., 1982. Meiotic mutants in potato breeding. In: G.P. Redei (Ed.), Stadler Genetic Symposium Vol 14. University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, p. 99-109.
168. Peloquin, S.J., 1983. Genetic engineering with meiotic mutants. In: D.L. Mulcahy & E. Ottaviano (Eds), Pollen: Biology and Implications for Plant Breeding. New York, p. 311-316.
169. Peloquin, S.J., 1984. Utilization of exotic germplasm in potato breeding: germplasm transfer with haploids, and 2n gametes. In: W.L. Brown (Ed.), Conservation and Utilization of Exotic Germplasm to Improve Varieties. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Des Moines, Iowa, p. 147-158.
170. Peloquin, S.J., A.C. Gabert & R. Ortiz, 1996. Nature of "pollinator" effect in potato haploid production. American Journal of Botany 77: 539-542.
171. Peloquin, S.J., R.W. Hougas & A.C. Gabert, 1966. Haploidy as a new approach to the cytogenetics and breeding of Solanum tuberosum. In: R. Riley & K.R. Lewis (Eds), Chromosome Manipulations and Plant Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, p. 21-28.
172. Peloquin, S.J., S.H. Jansky & G.L. Yerk, 1989a. Potato cytogenetics and germplasm utilization. American Potato Journal 66: 629-638.
173. Peloquin, S.J. & R. Ortiz, 1992. Techniques for introgressing unadapted germplasm to breeding populations. In: T.P. Stalker & J.P. Murphy (Eds), Plant Breeding Populations in 1990s. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, p. 485-507.
174. Peloquin, S.J., J.E. Werner & G.L. Yerk, 1990. The use of potato haploids in potato genetics and breeding. In: P.K. Gupta & T. Tsuchiya (Eds), Chomosome Engineering in Plants, Part B. Elsevier, Barking, Essex, England, p. 79-92.
175. Peloquin, S.J., G.L. Yerk & J.E. Werner, 1989b. Ploidy manipulation in the potato. In: K.W. Adolph (Ed.), Chromosomes: Eukaryotic, Prokaryotic and Viral, Vol. II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, p. 167-178.
176. Pushkarnath, 1953. Studies in sterility in potatoes. IV. Genetics of incompatibility in Solanum aracc-papa. Euphytica 2: 49-58.
177. Quinn, A.A., D.W.S. Mok & S.J. Peloquin, 1974. Distribution and significance of diplandroids among the diploid Solanums. American Potato Journal 51: 16-21.
178. Ross, H., 1986. Potato breeding - Problems and perspectives. Advances in Plant Breeding (Supplement 13). Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin and Hamburg, 132 pp.
179. Rowe, P.R., 1967. Performance of diploid and vegetatively doubled clones of Phureja-haploid Tuberosum hybrids. American Potato Journal 44: 195-203.
180. Rudorf, W., 1950. Methods and results of breeding resistant strains of potatoes. American Potato Journal 27: 332-339.
181. Sarkar, K.R. & E.H. Coe, Jr, 1971. Anomalous fertilization in diploid-tetraploid crosses in maize. Crop Science 11: 539-542.
182. Shevtsov, I.A., 1972. Hybridization of diploid and tetraploid forms of certain species of Solanum (translated from Russian). Genetika 8: 10-15.
183. Shivanna, K.-R., Y. Heslop-Harrison & J. Heslop-Harrison. 1982. The pollen-stigma interaction in the grasses. 3. Features of the self-incompatibility response. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 31: 307-319.
184. Singh, A.K., H. Uhrig & F. Salamini, 1988. Implications of chromosome pairing in a monohaploid and its colchidiploid of Solanum tubcrosuin (x=12). Genome 30: 347-351.
185. Smith, J.A., 1984. Seed formation in inter-and intraspecific hybrids of Solanum species. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota-St. Paul, 141 pp.
186. Smith, J.A. & S.L. Desborough, 1986. Interpretation of genomic balance in seed formation in interspecific hybrids of Solanum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 72: 346-352.
187. Sprague, G.F., 1933. Pollen tube establishment and the deficiency of waxy seeds in certain maize crosses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 9: 838-841.
188. Stebbins, G.L., 1974. Flowering plants: Evolution above the species level. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 339 pp.
189. Stebbins, G.L., 1976. Seeds, seedlings, and the origin of angiosperms. In: C.D. Beck (Ed.), Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 300-311.
190. Stelly, D.M., S.J. Peloquin, R.G. Palmer & C.F. Crane, 1983. Mayer's hemaluin-methyl salicylate: a stain-clearing technique for observations within whole ovules. Stain Technology 59: 155-161.
191. Stephens, S.C., 1942. Colchicine-produced polyploids in Gossipium. I. An autotetraploid asiatic cotton and certain of its hybrids with wild diploid species. Journal of Genetics 44: 272-295.
192. Stettler, R.F., R. Koster & V. Steenackers, 1980. Interspecific crossability studies in poplars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 58: 273-282.
193. Summers, D. & P. Grun, 1981. Reproductive isolation barriers to gene exchange between Solanum chacoense and S. commersonii (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 68: 1240-1248.
194. Tai, G.C.C., 1994. Use of 2n gametes. In: J.E. Bradshaw & C.R. MacKay (Eds), Potato Genetics. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, p. 109-132.
195. Thill, C.A. & S.J. Peloquin, 1995. A breeding method for accelerated development of cold chipping clones in potato. Euphytica 84: 73-80.
196. Trognitz, B.R. & P.E. Schmiediche, 1993. A new look at incompatibility relationships in higher plants. Sexual Plant Reproduction 6: 183-190.
197. Tsuchiya, T., 1960. Studies on cross incompatibility of diploid, triploid and tetraploid barleys. 2. Results of crosses between triploids, diploids and induced autotetraploids. Japanese Journal of Genetics 35: 337-343.
198. Valentine, D.H., 1954. Seed incompatibility. Proceedings 8th International Botanical Congress Section 9: 170-171.
199. Valentine, D.H., 1956. Studies in British Primula. 5. The inheritance of seed incompatibility. New Phytologist 55: 305-318.
200. Veilleux, R.E., J. Booze-Daniels & E. Pehu, 1985. Anther culture of a 2n pollen producing clone of Solanium phureja Juz et. Buk. Canadian Journal of Genetic Cytology 27: 559-564.
201. Wangenheim, K.H. von. 1955. Zur Ursache der Kreuzungsschwierigkeiten zwischen Solanum tuberosum L. und S. acaule Bitt. bzw. S. stoloniferum Schlechtd. et Bouche. Zeitschrift für Pftanzenzüchtung 34: 7-48.
202. Wangenheim, K.H. von, S.J. Peloquin & R.W. Hougas, 1960. Embryological investigations on the formation of haploids in the potato (Solanum tuberosum). Zeitschrift für Vererbungslehre 91: 391-399.
203. Walker, R.I., 1955. Cytological and embryological studies in Solanum, section Tuberarium. Bulletin Torrey Botanical Club 82:87-101.
204. Watanabe, K.M., M. Orillo, S. Perez & J. Crusado, 1996a. Testing yield of diploid potato breeding lines for cultivar development. Breeding Science 46: 245-249.
205. Watanabe, K.N., M. Orillo, S. Vega, A.M. Golmirzaie, S. Perez, J. Crusado & J.A. Watanabe, 1996b. Generation of pest resistant diploid potato germplasm with short-day adaptation from diverse genetic stocks. Breeding Science 46: 329-336.
206. Watanabe, K. & S.J. Peloquin. 1989. Occurrence of 2n pollen and ps gene frequencies in cultivated groups and their related wild species in tuber-bearing Solanums. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 78: 329-336.
207. Watkins, A.E., 1932. Hybrid sterility and incompatibility. Journal of Genetics 25: 125-162.
208. Wellensiek, S.J., 1955. The genetics of diploid × tetraploid and reciprocal cyclamen crosses. Züchter 25: 299-230.
209. Wenzel, G., C. Meyer, T. Przewozny, H. Ulrig & O. Schieder, 1982. Incorporation of microspore and protoplast techniques into potato breeding programs. In: E.D. Earle & Y. Demarly (Eds), Variability in Plants Regenerated from Tissue Culture. Praeger Publishers. New York, p. 290-302.
210. Wenzel, G., O. Schieder, T. Przewozny, S.K. Sopory & G. Melchers, 1979. Comparison of single cell culture derived Solanum tuberosum L. plants and a model for their application in breeding program. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 55: 49-55.
211. Werner, J.E. & S.J. Peloquin, 1991. Occurrence and mechanisms of 2n egg formation in 2x potato. Genome 34: 975-982.
212. Wilkinson, M.J., S.T. Bennet, S.A. Clulow, J. Alla-Inguillaume, K. Harding & M.D. Bennet. 1995. Evidence for somatic translocation during potato dihaploid induction. Heredity 74: 146-151.
213. Williams, E.G., R.B. Knox & J.L. Rouse, 1982. Pollination sub-systems distinguished by pollen tube arrest after incompatible interspecific crosses in Rhododendron (Ericaceae). Journal of Cell Science 53: 255-277.