Investigating the effects of robotic displays of protest and distress

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7621 LNAI, Issue , 2012, Pages 238-247

  Briggs, Gordon ^a   Scheutz, Matthias ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL AGENTS; ETHICAL BEHAVIOR; HUMAN SUBJECTS;

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; ROBOTICS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84868679205     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Kahn, P., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B., Kanda, T., Freier, N., Severson, R., Ruckert, J., Shen, S.: Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now: Children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology 48, 303-314 (2012)
2. Wallach, W.: Robot minds and human ethics: the need for a comprehensive model of moral decision making. Ethics of Information Technology 12, 243-250 (2010)
3. Arkin, R.: Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture. Technical Report GIT-GVU-07-11, Georgia Institute of Technology (2009)
4. Takayama, L., Groom, V., Nass, C.: I'm sorry, dave: I'm afraid i won't do that: Social aspect of human-agent conflict. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM SIGCHI, pp. 2099-2107 (2009)
5. Ogawa, K., Bartneck, C., Sakamoto, D., Kanda, T., Ono, T., Ishiguro, H.: Can an android persuade you? In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 516-521. IEEE (2009)
6. Siegel, M., Breazeal, C., Norton, M.: Persuasive robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2563-2568. IEEE (2009)
7. Rose, R., Scheutz, M., Schermerhorn, P.: Towards a conceptual and methodological framework for determining robot believability. Interaction Studies 11(2), 314-335 (2010)
8. Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56(1), 81-103 (2000)
9. Nass, C.: Etiquette equality: exhibitions and expectations of computer politeness. Communications of the ACM 47(4), 35-37 (2004)
10. Dennett, D.: Intentional systems. The Journal of Philosophy 68(4), 87-106 (1971)
11. Zeng, Z., Pantic, M., Roisman, G., Huang, T.: A survey of affect recognition methods: Audio, visual, and spontaneous expressions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31(1), 39-58 (2009)
12. Turkle, S.: Relational artifacts/children/elders: The complexities of cybercompanions. In: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science,, pp. 62-73. Cognitive Science Society (2005)
13. Bartneck, C., Verbunt,M., Mubin, O., Mahmud, A.A.: To kill a mockingbird robot. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 81-87. ACM (2007)
14. Bartneck, C., van der Hoek, M., Mubin, O., Mahmud, A.A.: 'daisy, daisy, give me your answer do!': Switching off a robot. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 217-222. ACM (2007)