I'm sorry, dave: I'm afraid i won't do that: Social aspects of human-agent conflict

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 2099-2107

  Takayama, Leila ^a,b   Groom, Victoria ^a,b   Nass, Clifford ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Willow Garage Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Disagreement; Distancing; Face threatening acts; Human agent interaction; Human robot interaction; Politeness; Throwing voices

Indexed keywords

DISAGREEMENT; DISTANCING; FACE-THREATENING ACTS; HUMAN-AGENT INTERACTION; POLITENESS;

FELT; HUMAN ENGINEERING; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84892454007     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1518701.1519021     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Black, A. W. and Lenzo, K. A. Building synthetic voices. Language Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University and Cepstral LLC. http://festvox.org/bsv/.
2. Breazeal, C., Gray, J., Hoffman, G. and Berlin, M. Social robots: Beyond tools to partners. Proc. ROMAN 2004, IEEE (2004), 551-556.
3. Breazeal, C., Kidd, C.D., Thomaz, A.L., Hoffman, G. and Berlin, M. Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork. IROS 2005, IEEE (2005).
4. Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. Politeness: Some universal in language usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1978.
5. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I. and Dautenhahn, K. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42 (2003), 143-166.
6. Friedman, B., Kahn, R.H. and Hagman, J. Hardware Companions? What Online AIBO Discussion Forums Reveal about the Human-Robotic Relationship. Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 273-280.
7. Gemperle, F., DiSalvo, C., Forlizzi, J. and Yonkers, W. The hug: A new form for communication. Proc. DUX 2003, ACM Press (2003), 1-4.
8. Geertz, C. The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
9. Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books, New York, NY, USA, 1959.
10. Groom, V. and Nass, C. Can robots Be teammates?: Benchmarks and predictors of failure in human-robot teams. Interaction Studies (2008), 8(3), 483-500.
11. Guerin, B. Mere presence effects in humans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22 (1986), 38-77.
12. Horwitz, S. K. The compositional impact of team diversity on performance. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 2 (2005), 219-245.
13. Klemmer, S.R., Hartmann, B. and Takayama, L. How bodies matter: Five themes for interaction design. Proc. DIS2006. ACM Press (2006).
14. Kubrick, S. 2001: A Space Odyssey. MGM (1968).
15. Kulyukin, V.A. On natural language dialog with assistive robots. HRI2006, ACM Press (2006), 164-171.
16. Lafferty, J.C. and Eady, P.M. The desert survival problem. Experimental Learning Methods, Plymouth, MI, 1974.
17. Lee, K.M. Presence, explicated. Communication Theory 14 (2004), 27-50.
18. Lee, K.M., Jung, Y., Kim, J. and Kim, S.R. Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents? IJHCS 64 (2006), 962-973.
19. Maglio, P., Matlock, T, Gould, S.J., Koons, D. and Campbell, C.S. On understanding discourse in human- computer interaction. Proc. Cog Sci 2002, LEA (2002), 602-607.
20. Mutlu, B., Oman, S, Forlizzi, J., Hodgins, J. and Kiesler, S. Perceptions of ASIMO. Proc. HRJ 2006, ACM Press (2006), 351-352.
21. Nass, C. and Brave, S.B. Wired For Speech. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005.
22. Nass, C. and Steuer, J. Voices, boxes, and sources of messages. Human Communication Research 19, 4 (1993), 504-527.
23. Nass, C., Takayama, L. and Brave, S.B. Social Consistency. In Zhang, P. and Galletta, D. (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, USA, 2006.
24. Nielsen, J. Coordinating User Interfaces for Consistency. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2002.
25. Patel, K, Bailenson, J.N., Hack-Jung, S., Diankov, R. and Bajcsy, R. The effects of fully immersive virtual reality on the learning of physical tasks. Proc. Presence 2006, ISPR (2006).
26. Powers, A. and Kiesler, S. The advisor robot: Tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. Proc. HRI2006, ACM Press (2006), 218-225.
27. Powers, A., Kiesler, S., Fussell, S.R. and Torrey, C. Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. Proc. HRI 2007, ACM/IEEE (2007), 145-152.26.
28. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. The Media Equation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, CA, USA, 1996.
29. Steinfeld, A.M., Fong, T, Kaber, D, Lewis, M., Scholtz, J., Schultz, A. and Goodrich, M. Common metrics for human-robot interaction. Proc. HRI2006, ACM Press (2006), 33-40.
30. Sundar, S. S. and Nass, C. Source orientation in human- computer interaction. Communication Research 27, 6 (2000), 683-703.
31. Takayama, L. Throwing voices: Investigating the psychological effects of the spatial location of projected voices. Dissertation (2008).
32. Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S.N. and Koay, K.L. Robot etiquette. Proc. HRI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 317-324.
33. Wang, E, Lignos, C., Vatsal, A. and Scassellati, B. Effects of head movement on perceptions of humanoid robot behavior. Proc. HRI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 180-185.