The Computer-based Health Evaluation Software (CHES): A software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Holzner, Bernhard ^a,b   Giesinger, Johannes M ^a   Pinggera, Jakob ^c   Zugal, Stefan ^c   Schöpf, Felix ^b,d   Oberguggenberger, Anne S ^a   Gamper, Eva M ^a   Zabernigg, August ^e   Weber, Barbara ^c   Rumpold, Gerhard ^a,b  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b Evaluation Software Development OG   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^d Oncotyrol Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine   (Austria)

^e Kufstein Hospital   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SELF REPORT;

HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SELF REPORT; SOFTWARE DESIGN; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84868545009     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-126     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Patient-reported outcomes: assessment and current perspectives of the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration and the reflection paper of the European Medicines Agency. Bottomley A, Jones D, Claassens L, Eur J Cancer 2009 45 3 347 53 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.032 19013787
2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry-Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. U.S. FDA, Clinical/Medical; 2009. Accessed 8th November 2012
3. The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting. Basch E, N Engl J Med 2010 362 10 865 9 10.1056/NEJMp0911494 20220181
4. Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: comments on an evolving field. Ware JE Jr, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003 84 4 Suppl 2 43 51 12692771
5. Logistic feasibility of health related quality of life measurement in clinical practice: results of a prospective study in a large population of chronic liver patients. Gutteling JJ, Busschbach JJ, de Man RA, Darlington AS, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008 6 97 10.1186/1477-7525-6-97 19000316
6. Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, Speca M, DeGagne T, Olson K, Doll R, Rosberger Z, Psychooncology 2000 9 3 203 13 10.1002/1099-1611(200005/06)9:3<203::AID-PON453>3.0.CO;2-Y 10871716 (Pubitemid 30392195)
7. Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. Wright EP, Selby PJ, Crawford M, Gillibrand A, Johnston C, Perren TJ, Rush R, Smith A, Velikova G, Watson K, Gould A, Cull A, J Clin Oncol 2003 21 2 374 82 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.044 12525532 (Pubitemid 46606168)
8. Implementation of computer-based quality-of-life monitoring in brain tumor outpatients in routine clinical practice. Erharter A, Giesinger J, Kemmler G, Schauer-Maurer G, Stockhammer G, Muigg A, Hutterer M, Rumpold G, Sperner-Unterweger B, Holzner B, J Pain Symptom Manage 2010 39 2 219 29 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.015 20152586
9. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S, Value Health 2008 11 2 322 33 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x 18380645 (Pubitemid 351473608)
10. Basch E, and Force IeT, Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Coons S, Gwaltney C, Hays R, Lundy J, Sloan J, Revicki D, Lenderking W, Cella D, Value Health 2009 12 4 419 429 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x 19900250
11. Applying an extended theoretical framework for data collection mode to health services research. Robling MR, Ingledew DK, Greene G, Sayers A, Shaw C, Sander L, Russell IT, Williams JG, Hood K, BMC Health Serv Res 2010 10 180 10.1186/1472-6963-10-180 20576131
12. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM, Selby PJ, J Clin Oncol 2004 22 4 714 24 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.078 14966096 (Pubitemid 41095076)
13. Improving patient outcomes through the routine use of patient-reported data in cancer clinics: future directions. Luckett T, Butow PN, King MT, Psychooncology 2009 18 11 1129 38 10.1002/pon.1545 19319920
14. Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. Basch E, Artz D, Dulko D, Scher K, Sabbatini P, Hensley M, Mitra N, Speakman J, McCabe M, Schrag D, J Clin Oncol 2005 23 15 3552 61 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.275 15908666
15. Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bush N, Donaldson G, Moinpour C, Haberman M, Milliken D, Markle V, Lauson J, Qual Life Res 2005 14 7 77 93 15789943 (Pubitemid 40249083)
16. Validation study of a web-based assessment of functional recovery after radical prostatectomy. Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Shouery M, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Basch EM, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010 8 82 20687938
17. PatientViewpoint: a website for patient-reported outcomes assessment. Snyder CF, Jensen R, Courtin SO, Wu AW, Qual Life Res 2009 18 7 793 800 10.1007/s11136-009-9497-8 19544089
18. User's Guide to Implementing Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice. Aaronson N, Choucair A, Elliott T, Greenhalgh J, Halyard M, Hess R, Miller D, Reeve B, Santana M, Snyder CF, 2011 Available from: http://www.isoqol.org/pdfs/UsersGuide.pdf
19. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Greenhalgh J, Qual Life Res 2009 18 1 115 23 10.1007/s11136-008- 9430-6 19105048
20. Routine collection of patient-reported outcomes in an HIV clinic setting: the first 100 patients. Crane HM, Lober W, Webster E, Harrington RD, Crane PK, Davis TE, Kitahata MM, Curr HIV Res 2007 5 1 109 18 10.2174/157016207779316369 17266562 (Pubitemid 46062364)
21. Evaluation of the Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research (CASPER) as a measure of treatment effectiveness with psychiatric inpatients. Kinnaman J, Farrell A, Bisconer S, Assessment 2006 13 2 154 67 10.1177/1073191105285952 16672730 (Pubitemid 43707963)
22. Computerized self-assessment of psychosis severity questionnaire [COSAPSQ] in schizophrenia: preliminary results. Stern RG, Fudge R, Sison CE, Allan ER, Crichton J, Losonczy M, Psychopharmacol Bull 1998 34 1 9 12 9564192 (Pubitemid 28176295)
23. Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. McLachlan SA, Allenby A, Matthews J, Wirth A, Kissane D, Bishop M, Beresford J, Zalcberg J, J Clin Oncol 2001 19 21 4117 25 11689579 (Pubitemid 33049529)
24. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LDV, Aaronson NK, Jama 2002 288 23 3027 34 10.1001/jama.288.23.3027 12479768 (Pubitemid 35471165)
25. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R, Soc Sci Med 2005 60 4 833 43 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.022 15571900 (Pubitemid 39574779)
26. Beck K, Andres C, Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change Boston: Addison-Wesley 2nd edition 2005
27. The PROMIS network, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2011 Available from: http://www.nihpromis.org
28. Development of computerised adaptive testing (CAT) for the EORTC QLQ-C30 dimensions-general approach and initial results for physical functioning. Petersen MA, Groenvold M, Aaronson NK, Chie WC, Conroy T, Costantini A, Fayers P, Helbostad J, Holzner B, Kaasa S, Singer S, Velikova G, Young T, Eur J Cancer 2010 46 8 1352 8 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.011 20231085
29. Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Green B, Bock R, Humphreys L, Journal of Educational Measurement 1984 21 347 360 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb01039.x
30. Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Chang CH, Qual Life Res 2007 16 Suppl 1 157 66 17530448
31. Daemen J, Rijmen V, The Design of RijndaeL: AES-The Advanced Encryption Standard (Information Security and Cryptography) Berlin: Springer 2002
32. EORTC Quality of Life Group, EORTC Quality of Life 2012 Available from: http://groups.eortc.be/qol/
33. Testis cancer. Sokoloff MH, Joyce GF, Wise M, J Urol 2007 177 6 2030 41 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.127 17509283 (Pubitemid 46726398)
34. PHT Corporation, PHT Firsthand Knowledge. 2011 2011 Available from: http://www.phtcorp.com/
35. Invivo Data Inc, 2011 [cited 2011 30 Nov 2011]; Available from: http://www.invivodata.com/
36. AssisTek Inc, 2011 [cited 2011 30 Nov 2011]; Available from: http://www.assistek.com/
37. Assessment Cente. The PROMIS network, 2011 cited 2010 30 Nov 2011]; Available from: https://www.assessmentcenter.net
38. Integrating cancer survivors' experiences into UK cancer registries: design and development of the ePOCS system (electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors). Ashley L, Jones H, Thomas J, Forman D, Newsham A, Morris E, Johnson O, Velikova G, Wright P, Br J Cancer 2011 105 Suppl 1 74 81 22048035
39. Feasibility test of a UK-scalable electronic system for regular collection of patient-reported outcome measures and linkage with clinical cancer registry data: The electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system. Ashley L, Jones H, Forman D, Newsham A, Brown J, Downing A, Velikova G, Wright P, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011 11 66 10.1186/1472-6947-11- 66 22029686
40. The Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship registry: scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts. van de Poll-Franse LV, Horevoorts N, van Eenbergen M, Denollet J, Roukema JA, Aaronson NK, Vingerhoets A, Coebergh JW, de Vries J, Essink-Bot ML, Mols F, Eur J Cancer 2011 47 14 2188 94 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04. 034 21621408
41. Touch screen computer-assisted health-related quality of life and distress data collection in head and neck cancer patients. de Bree R, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Keizer AL, Houffelaar A, Leemans CR, Clin Otolaryngol 2008 33 2 138 142 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01676.x 18429869 (Pubitemid 351569631)
42. VU medisch centrum and NDDO Institute for Prevention and Early Diagnostics (NIPED), OncoKompas 2011 cited 2011 30 Nov 2011]; Available from: http://www.oncokompas.nl/
43. Development and implementation of a patient reported outcome intervention (QLIC-ON PROfile) in clinical paediatric oncology practice. Engelen V, Haverman L, Koopman H, Schouten-van Meeteren N, Meijer-van D, Bergh E, Vrijmoet-Wiersma J, van Dijk EM, Last B, Detmar S, Grootenhuis M, Patient Educ Couns 2010 81 2 235 244 10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.003 20189747
44. Monitoring health-related quality of life in paediatric practice: development of an innovative web-based application. Haverman L, Engelen V, van Rossum MA, Heymans HS, Grootenhuis MA, BMC Pediatr 2011 11 3 10.1186/1471-2431-11-3 21226913
45. A comparison of electronic records to paper records in mental health centers. Tsai J, Bond G, Int J Qual Health Care 2008 20 2 136 43 18079127 (Pubitemid 351436970)
46. Clinical computing in a teaching hospital. Bleich HL, Beckley RF, Horowitz GL, Jackson JD, Moody ES, Franklin C, Goodman SR, McKay MW, Pope RA, Walden T, et al. N Engl J Med 1985 312 12 756 64 10.1056/NEJM198503213121205 3838364 (Pubitemid 15104797)
47. Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model. Szajna B, Management Science 1996 42 1 82 85
48. Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic. Carlson LE, Speca M, Hagen N, Taenzer P, J Palliat Care 2001 17 1 46 52 11324185 (Pubitemid 33710836)
49. Can a computerized format replace a paper form in PRO and HRQL evaluation? Psychometric testing of the computer-assisted LCSS instrument (eLCSS-QL). Hollen PJ, Gralla RJ, Stewart JA, Meharchand JM, Wierzbicki R, Leighl N, Support Care Cance 2012 Jun 10. [Epub ahead of print]
50. Feasibility and acceptance of electronic quality of life assessment in general practice: an implementation study. Rogausch A, Sigle J, Seibert A, Thuring S, Kochen MM, Himmel W, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009 7 51 10.1186/1477-7525-7-51 19493355
51. Physicians' knowledge of health-related quality of life and perception of its importance in daily clinical practice. Bossola M, Murri R, Onder G, Turriziani A, Fantoni M, Padua L, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010 8 43 10.1186/1477-7525-8-43 20416062
52. Management of patients with asthma and COPD: monitoring quality of life and the relationship to subsequent GP interventions. Jacobs JE, van de Lisdonk EH, Smeele I, van Weel C, Grol RP, Fam Pract 2001 18 6 574 80 10.1093/fampra/18.6.574 11739339 (Pubitemid 34026578)
53. Long-term toxicity monitoring via electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy. Basch E, Iasonos A, Barz A, Culkin A, Kris MG, Artz D, Fearn P, Speakman J, Farquhar R, Scher HI, McCabe M, Schrag D, J Clin Oncol 2007 25 34 5374 80 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.2243 18048818 (Pubitemid 350232212)
54. Development of a computer-adaptive version of the Forgotten Joint Score. Giesinger J, Kuster M, Holzner B, Giesinger K, J Arthroplasty in press