Applying an extended theoretical framework for data collection mode to health services research

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Robling, Michael R ^a   Ingledew, David K ^b   Greene, Giles ^a   Sayers, Adrian ^c   Shaw, Chris ^d   Sander, Lesley ^a   Russell, Ian T ^e   Williams, John G ^e   Hood, Kerenza ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

^e SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARD; THEORETICAL MODEL;

DATA COLLECTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 77954580303     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-180     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Can clinical trials requiring frequent participant contact be conducted over the internet? Results from an online randomized controlled trial evaluating a topical ointment for herpes labialis. M Formica K Kabbara R Clark T McAlindon, Journal of Medical Internet Research 2004 6 1 6 10.2196/jmir.6.1.e6 15111272
2. Conducting clinical trials over the internet: a feasibility study. T McAlindon M Formica K Kabbara M LaValley M Lehmer, British Medical Journal 2003 327 484 487 10.1136/bmj.327.7413.484 12946971
3. Are they really as bad as they seem? Nonresponse rates at the end of the twentieth century. C Steeh N Kirgis B Cannon J DeWitt, Journal of Official Statistics 2001 17 2 227 247
4. Technology, experimentation, and the quality of survey data. DE Bloom, Science 1998 280 5365 847 848 10.1126/science.280.5365.847 9599156
5. Response rates and mode preferences in web-mail mixed-mode surveys: a meta-analysis. TH Shih X Fan, International Journal of Internet Science 2007 2 1 59 82
6. Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: a meta-analysis. TH Shih X Fan, Educational Research Review 2009 4 26 40 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01. 003
7. RM Groves FJ Fowler Jr MP Couper JM Lepkowski E Singer R Tourangeau, Survey Methodology New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons 2004
8. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. R Crow H Gage S Hampson J Hart A Kimber L Storey H Thomas, Health Technology Assessment 2002 6 32 12925269
9. R Tourangeau LJ Rips K Rasinski, The psychology of survey response Cambridge: Cambridge University Press First 2000
10. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. PM Podsakoff SB MacKenzie JY Lee NP Podsakoff, Journal of Applied Psychology 2003 88 5 879 903 10.1037/0021-9010.88. 5.879 14516251
11. Evaluating the impact of data collection mode upon response to subjective surveys: main results from the MODE ARTS systematic review. MR Robling K Hood G Greene A Sayers DK Ingledew IT Russell R Ivans L Sander J Williams C Shaw, 14th Annual Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Research. Toronto 2007
12. Human research and data collection via the internet. MH Birnbaum, Annual Reviews of Psychology 2004 55 803 832 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601
13. Applying item response theory to enhance health outcomes assessment. BB Reeve RD Hays CH Chang EM Perfetto, Quality of Life Research 2007 16 1 3 10.1007/s11136-007-9220-6 17033892
14. Development of symptom assessments utilising item response theory and computer-adaptive testing - a practical method based on a systematic review. J Walker JR Böhnke T Cerny F Strasser, Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 2010 73 47 67 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.03.007 19375939
15. Applying item response theory and computer adaptive testing: the challenges for health outcomes assessment. PM Fayers, Quality of Life Research 2007 16 187 194 10.1007/s11136-007-9197-1 17417722
16. Survey mode as a source of instability in responses across surveys. DA Dillman LM Christian, Field Methods 2005 17 1 30 52 10.1177/1525822X04269550
17. Cognitive psychology and self-reports: models and methods. JB Jobe, Quality of Life Research 2003 12 3 219 227 10.1023/A:1023279029852 12769134
18. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. JA Krosnick, Applied Cognitive Psychology 1991 5 213 236 10.1002/acp.2350050305
19. The Equalization Phenomenon: status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. VJ Dubrovsky S Kiesler BN Sethna, Human-Computer Interaction 1991 6 119 146 10.1207/s15327051hci0602-2
20. Underreporting of abortions in surveys of U.S. women: 1976 to 1988. EF Jones JD Forrest, Demography 1992 29 1 113 126 10.2307/2061366 1547898
21. Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: does the computer make a difference? S Booth-Kewley JE Edwards P Rosenfeld, Journal of Applied Psychology 1992 77 4 562 566 10.1037/0021-9010.77.4.562
22. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. CF Turner L Ku SM Rogers LD Lindberg JH Pleck FL Sonenstein, Science 1998 280 867 873 10.1126/science.280.5365.867 9572724
23. Humanizing self-adminstered surveys: experiments on social presence in web and IVR surveys. R Tourangeau MP Couper DM Steiger, Computers in Human Behaviour 2003 19 1 24 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00032-8 (Pubitemid 35460100)
24. When the Interface Is a Face. L Sproull M Subramani S Kiesler JH Walker K Waters, Human-Computer Interaction 1996 11 97 124 10.1207/s15327051hci1102-1
25. Recall of health-risky behaviors for the prior 2 or 4 weeks via computerized versus printed questionnaire. BT Yates JL Wagner LM Suprenant, Computers in Human Behaviour 1997 13 1 83 110 10.1016/S0747-5632(96)00031-3
26. The impact of the presence of others on a respondent's answers to questions. TW Smith, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 1997 9 1 33 47
27. Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation. RM Groves E Singer A Corning, Public Opinion Quarterly 2000 64 299 308 10.1086/317990 11114270
28. DA Dillman, Mail and internet surveys New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc Second 2000
29. Survey research. JA Krosnick, Annual Reviews of Psychology 1999 50 537 567 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537
30. The impact of "no opinion" response options on data quality: non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? JA Krosnick AL Holbrook MK Berent RT Carson WM Hanemann RJ Kopp RC Mitchell S Presser PA Ruud VK Smith,, et al. Public Opinion Quarterly 2002 66 371 403 10.1086/341394 (Pubitemid 37239583)
31. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires. AL Holbrook MC Green JA Krosnick, Public Opinion Quarterly 2003 67 79 125 10.1086/346010
32. Questionnaire mode effects in interactive information retrieval experiments. D Kelly DJ Harper B Landau, Information processing and management 2008 44 122 141 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.007 (Pubitemid 350007901)
33. An evaluation of cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. JA Krosnick DF Alwin, Public Opinion Quarterly 1987 51 201 219 10.1086/269029
34. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing: mode effects on data quality and likely causes. Report on phase II of the ESS-Gallup Mixed Mode Methodology Project. A Jäckle C Roberts P Lynn, Colchester: University of Essex 2006
35. S Sudman NM Bradburn, Response effects in surveys Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company 1974
36. S Sudman NM Bradburn, Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers 1982
37. Two-component models of socially desirable responding. DL Paulhus, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984 46 3 598 609 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
38. Data quality in mail, telephone and face to face surveys. ED de Leeuw, Amsterdam: TT Publicaties 1992
39. A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires and interviews. WL Richman S Kiesler S Weisband F Drasgow, Journal of Applied Psychology 1999 84 5 754 775 10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.754
40. A quantitative review of the effect of computerized testing on the measurement of social desirability. SA Dwight ME Feigelson, Educational and psychological measurement 2000 60 340 360 10.1177/00131640021970583
41. Equivalance of computerized and traditional research methods: the roles of scanning, social environment, and social desirability. EM Whitener HJ Klein, Computers in Human Behaviour 1995 11 1 65 75 10.1016/0747-5632(94)00023-B
42. The science of asking questions. NC Shaeffer S Presser, Annual Reviews of Sociology 2003 29 65 88 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.110702.110112 (Pubitemid 37395366)
43. Why people say "Yes": a dual-process theory of acquiescence. ES Knowles CA Condon, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999 77 2 379 386 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.379
44. Response styles in telephone and household interviewing: a field experiment. LA Jordan AC Marcus LG Reeder, Public Opinion Quarterly 1980 44 2 210 222 10.1086/268585
45. Asking senstive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. R Tourangeau TW Smith, Public Opinion Quarterly 1996 60 275 304 10.1086/297751
46. Lessons from the literature: towards a holistic model of quality of life. H Day S Jankey, Quality of life in health promotion and rehabilitation Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Renwick R, Brown I, Nagler M, 1996
47. Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal. CE Schwartz BD Rapkin, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2004 2 16 10.1186/1477-7525-2-16 15038830
48. Estimating trait, method, and error variance: generalizing across 70 construct validation studies. JA Cote R Buckley, Journal of Marketing Research 1987 24 315 318 10.2307/3151642
49. Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patients. KG Ghanem HE Hutton JM Zenilman R Zimba EJ Erbelding, Sexually Transmitted Infections 2004 81 421 425 10.1136/sti.2004.013193
50. Methods used to maintain a high level of involvement in a clinical trial. ME Hellard MI Sinclair AB Forbes CK Fairley, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2001 55 348 351 10.1136/jech.55.5.348 11297658
51. Patient recruitment to a randomized clinical trial of behavioral therapy for chronic heart failure. BH Chang AM Hendricks MT Slawsky JS Locastro, BMC Medical Research Methodology 2003 4 8 10.1186/1471-2288-4-8
52. South Asian patients' views and experiences of clinical trial participation. M Hussain-Gambles, Family Practice 2004 21 6 636 642 10.1093/fampra/cmh611 15528290
53. Attitudes toward interview mode and comparability of reporting sexual behaviour by personal interview and audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: analyses of the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. M Hewitt, Sociological Methods & Research 2002 31 3 3 10.1177/0049124102031001001
54. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. R Fitzpatrick C Davey MJ Buxton DR Jones, Health Technology Assessment 1998 2 14
55. Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data. O Dale KB Hagen, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2007 60 8 17 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.04.005 17161749
56. The application of computer touch-screen technology in screening for psychosocial distress in an ambulatory oncology setting. A Allenby J Matthews J Beresford S McLachlan, Euopean Journal of Cancer Care 2002 11 245 253 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00310.x
57. Validation of electronic data capture of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Quality of Life measure, and Acitvity Impairment Questionnaire for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and the EuroQol. DM Bushnell MC Reilly C Galani ML Martin JF Ricci DL Patrick CR McBurney, Value in Health 2006 9 2 98 105 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00087.x 16626413
58. Research sensitivities to palliative care patients. J Addington-Hall, Euopean Journal of Cancer Care 2002 11 220 224 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00343.x
59. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. S Marshall K Haywood R Fitzpatrick, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2006 12 5 559 568 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00650.x 16987118
60. Routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. J Dawson H Doll R Fitzpatrick C Jenkinson AJ Carr, British Medical Journal 2010 340 464 467 10.1136/bmj.c464
61. Assessing patient care - NHS goes to the PROMS. N Timmins, British Medical Journal 2008 336 1464 1465 10.1136/bmj.39618.627951.80 18583674
62. The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Greenhalgh K Meadows, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1999 5 4 410 416 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00209.x (Pubitemid 29519188)
63. Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. M Espallargues JM Valderas, Medical Care 2000 38 2 175 186 10.1097/00005650-200002000-00007 10659691
64. Exploration of the value of health-related quality-of-life information from clinical research and into clinical practice. GH Guyatt C Estwing Ferrans MY Halyard DA Revicki TL Symonds CG Varricchio A Kotzeva JM Valderas JL Alonso Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group, Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2007 82 10 1229 1239 10.4065/82.10.1229 17908529
65. Logistic feasibility of health related quality of life measurement in clinical practice: results of a prospective study in a large population of chronic liver patients. JJ Gutteling JJ Busschbach RA de Man A-SE Darlington, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2008 6 97 10.1186/1477-7525-6-97 19000316
66. Role of health-related quality of life measures in the routine care of people with multiple sclerosis. A Solari, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2005 3 16 10.1186/1477-7525-3-16 15777478
67. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? J Greenhalgh AF Long R Flynn, Social Science & Medicine 2005 60 833 843 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.022 (Pubitemid 39574779)
68. Guidance on the routine collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Department of Health, http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-092647
69. Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: an appraisal and precept for future research and application. JW Varni TM Burwinkle MM Lane, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2005 3 34 10.1186/1477-7525-3-34 15904527
70. Development and implementation of a patient reported outcome intervention (QLIC-ON PROfile) in clinical paediatric oncology practice. V Engelen L Haverman H Koopman N Schouten-van Meeteren E Meijer-van den Bergh J Vrijmoet-Wiersma EM van Dijk B Last S Detmar M Grootenhuis, Patient Education and Counseling 2010 10.1016/j.pec.2010.1002.1003 20189747
71. Mixing modes of data collection in surveys: a methodological review. C Roberts, http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/418/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-008.pdf
72. Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. SJ Blumberg JV Luke ML Cynamon, American Journal of Public Health 2006 96 5 926 931 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057885 16571707
73. Non-response to a life course socioeconomic position indicator in surveillance: comparison of telephone and face-to-face modes. CR Chittleborough AW Taylor FE Baum JE Hiller, BMC Medical Research Methodology 2008 8 54 10.1186/1471-2288-8-54 18700038
74. Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. SL Warner, Journal of the American Statistical Association 1965 60 309 63 69 10.2307/2283137 12261830
75. Meta-analysis of randomized response research: thirty-five years of validation. GJLM Lensvelt-Mulders JJ Hox PGM van der Heijden CJM Maas, Sociological Methods & Research 2005 33 3 319 348 10.1177/0049124104268664 (Pubitemid 40217174)
76. Using implict goal priming to improve the quality of self-report data. KA Rasinski PS Visser M Zagatasky EM Rickett, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005 41 321 327 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.07.001 (Pubitemid 40435766)