Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 16, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2007, Pages 157-166

  Chang, Chih Hung ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerized adaptive testing; Item response theory; Patient reported outcomes; Technology

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOFTWARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34447133040     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9196-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Patrick, D. L., & Chiang, Y. P. (2000). Measurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: conceptual and methodological challenges. Medical Care, 38(9 Suppl), II14-II25.
2. McHorney, C. A. (1997). Generic health measurement: past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(8_Part_2), 743-750.
3. Donaldson, M. S. (2004). Taking stock of health-related quality-of-life measurement in oncology practice in the United States. Journal of National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 33, 155-167.
4. White, E. B. (1998). Outcomes: essential information for clinical decision support: an interview with Ellen B. White. Interview by Melinda L. Orlando. Journal of Health Care Finance, 24(3), 71-81.
5. Ware, J. E. Jr. (2003). Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: comments on an evolving field. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(4 Suppl 2), S43-S51.
6. Emery, M. P., Perrier, L. L., & Acquadro, C. (2005). Patient-reported outcome and quality of life instruments database (PROQOLID): frequently asked questions. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 12.
7. US Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (2006) US Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4(1), 79.
8. Bradley, C. (2006). Feedback on the FDA's February 2006 draft guidance on patient reported outcome (PRO) measures from a developer of PRO measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 78.
9. Willke, R. J., Burke, L. B., & Erickson, P. (2004). Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels. Controlled Clinical Trials, 25(6), 535-552.
10. Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Measuring quality of life: using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ, 322(7297), 1297-1300.
11. Jacobsen, P. B., Davis, K., & Cella, D. (2002). Assessing quality of life in research and clinical practice. Oncology (Williston Park), 16(9 Suppl 10), 133-139.
12. Morris, J., Perez, D., & McNoe, B. (1998). The use of quality of life data in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 7(1), 85-91.
13. Bezjak, A., Ng, P., Taylor, K., MacDonald, K., & Depetrillo, A. D. (1997). A preliminary survey of oncologists' perceptions of quality of life information. Psychooncology, 6(2), 107-113.
14. Davis, K., & Cella, D. (2002). Assessing quality of life in oncology clinical practice: a review of barriers and critical success factors. Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management, 9, 327-332.
15. Ruta, D., Coutts, A., & Abdalla, M., et al. (1995). Feasibility of monitoring patient based health outcomes in a routine hospital setting. Quality of Health Care, 4(3), 161-165.
16. Deyo, R. A., & Patrick, D. L. (1989). Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research. Medical Care, 27(3 Suppl), S254-S268.
17. McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research, 4(4), 293-307.
18. Rubenstein, L. V., McCoy, J. M., & Cope, D. W., et al. (1995). Improving patient quality of life with feedback to physicians about functional status. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10(11), 607-614.
19. Nelson, E. C., Landgraf, J. M., Hays, R. D., Wasson, J. H., & Kirk, J. W. (1990). The functional status of patients. How can it be measured in physicians' offices? Medical Care, 28(12), 1111-1126.
20. Bezjak, A., Ng, P., Taylor, K., MacDonald, K., & Depetrillo, A. D. (1997). A preliminary survey of oncologists' perceptions of quality of life information. Psychooncology, 6(2), 107-113.
21. Taylor, K. M., Macdonald, K. G., Bezjak, A., Ng P., & DePetrillo, A. D. (1996). Physicians' perspective on quality of life: an exploratory study of oncologists. Quality of Life Research, 5(1), 5-14.
22. Bates, D. W., & Gawande, A. A. (2003). Improving safety with information technology. The New England Journal of Medicine 348(25), 19 June 2003, pp. 2526-2534.
23. Koppel, R., Metlay, J. P., & Cohen, A., et al. (2005). Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. The Journal of American Medical Association, 293(10), 1197-1203.
24. Yancik, R., Edwards, B. K., & Yates, J. W. (1989). Assessing the quality of life of cancer patients: Practical issues in study implementation. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 7(4), 59-74.
25. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., Rogers, H. J. (2000). Fundamentals of item response theory; 1991.
26. Humana buys into Web-based surveys to ID high-risk members. Health Demand Dis Manag, 6(6), 89-92.
27. Wyatt, J. C. (2000). When to use web-based surveys. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 7(4), 426-429.
28. Naylor, M. R., Helzer, J. E., Naud, S., & Keefe, F. J. (2002). Automated telephone as an adjunct for the treatment of chronic pain: a pilot study. Journal of Pain, 3(6), 429-438.
29. Piette, J. D. (2000). Interactive voice response systems in the diagnosis and management of chronic disease. American Journal of Management Care, 6(7), 817-827.
30. Ware, J. E. Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473-483.
31. Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., & Gray, G., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570-579.
32. Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., & Bergman, B., et al. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365-376.
33. Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation, cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation &the Health Professions, 28(2), 212-232.
34. Bowden, A., & Fox-Rushby, J. A. (2003). A systematic and critical review of the process of translation and adaptation of generic health-related quality of life measures in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, South America. Society of Science Medicine, 57(7), 1289-1306.
35. Maneesriwongul, W., & Dixon, J. K. (2004). Instrument translation process: a methods review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(2), 175-186.
36. HIPAA privacy rule and public health. Guidance from CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. MMWR Morb Mortal Weekly Report 52 Suppl, 1-17, 19-20, 2 May 2003.
37. Lax, J. R. (2002). The modified HIPAA Privacy Rule. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Optometry, 73(10), 635-645.
38. Nosowsky, R., & Giordano, T. J. (2006). The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) privacy rule: implications for clinical research. Annual Review of Medicine, 57, 575-590.
39. Wainer H, Dorans NJ, Green BF, et al. (1990).Computerized adaptive testing: A primer.
40. Ware, J. E. Jr., Bjorner, J. B., & Kosinski, M. (2000). Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Medical Care, 38(9 Suppl), II73-II82.
41. Ware, J. E. Jr., Kosinski, M., & Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2003). Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Quality of Life Research, 12(8), 935-952.
42. Payne, T. H. (2000). Computer decision support systems. Chest. 118(2 Suppl), 47S-52S.
43. Cella, D. (2006). The FDA, the person with cancer: give PROs a chance. Oncology (Williston Park), 20(4), 436.
44. Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical Experimental Rheumatology, 23(5 Suppl 39), S53-57.
45. Reeve, B. B. (2006). Special issues for building computerized-adaptive tests for measuring patient-reported outcomes: The National Institute of Health's Investment in New Technology. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S198-S204.