Outstanding knowledge competences and web 2.0 practices for developing successful e-learning project management

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 14-21

  Palacios Marqués, Daniel ^a   Cortés Grao, Rocío ^a   Lobato Carral, Clemente ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

E Learning project management; Knowledge competences; Project manager; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; MANAGERS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; TEACHING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

E-LEARNING MODELS; KNOWLEDGE COMPETENCES; LITERATURE REVIEWS; PROJECT MANAGERS; PROJECT PERFORMANCE; WEB 2.0;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84868301678     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Amit R., Zott C. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22(6-7):493-520.
2. Arbaugh J.B., Benbunan-Finch R. An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments. The Academy of Management Learning and Education 2006, 5(4):435-447.
3. Ashleigh M., Ojiako R. Critical learning themes in project management education: implications for blended learning. International Journal of Project Management 2012, 30:153-161.
4. Azjen I., Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior 1980, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York.
5. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. The American Psychologist 1982, 37(2):122-147.
6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control 1997, Freeman, New York.
7. Berge Z. Facilitating computer conferencing: recommendations from the field. Educational Technology 1995, 35(1):22-30.
8. Bork J., Gunnarsdottir S. The future for learning. Computers in Education 2002, 2(3):1520-1522.
9. Chen R., Hsiang C. A study on the critical success factors for corporation embarking on knowledge community-based e-learning. Information Sciences 2007, 177(2):570-586.
10. Collis B. Tele-learning in a Digital World. The Future of Distance Learning 1997, International Thomson Computer Press, London.
11. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989, 13(3):319-340.
12. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of user technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989, 35(8):982-1002.
13. Eskerod P. Action Learning for Further Developing Project Management Competencies: A Case Study from an Engineering Consultancy Company. International Journal of Project Management 2010, 28(4):352-360.
14. Fetscherin M., Lattemann C. User acceptance of virtual worlds. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 2008, 9(3):231-242.
15. Folorunso O., Ogunseye O., Sharma S. An exploratory study of the critical factors affecting the acceptability of e-learning in Nigerian universities. Information Management and Computer Security 2006, 14(5):496-505.
16. Fullard F. A model to evaluate the effectiveness of enterprise training programmes. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 2006, 3(3):263-276.
17. Garrison D.R., Anderson T. E-learning in XXI Century 2005, Octaedro Publishers, Barcelona.
18. Ho L.A., Kuo T.H., Lin B. Influence of online learning skills in cyberspace. Internet Research 2010, 20(1):55-71.
19. Hodges C. Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments. Performance Improvement Quarterly 2008, 20(3):7-25.
20. Holsapple C., Lee-Post A. Defining, assessing, and promoting e-learning success: an information systems perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 2006, 4(1):67-85.
21. Horton W. Designing Web-based Training 2000, John Wiley Publishers, New York.
22. Keen A. The Coult of the Amateur. How Today's Internet is Killing Our Culture 2007, Double Day, New York.
23. Khan B. Web-based Training 2001, Educational Technology Publications, New Jersey.
24. Lonn S., Teasley S. Saving time or innovating practice: investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems. Computers in Education 2009, 53(3):686-694.
25. Mahdizadeh H., Biemans H., Mulder M. Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers. Computers in Education 2008, 51(1):142-154.
26. Marsh G.E. Blended instruction: adapting conventional instruction for large classes. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 2003, (4).
27. Marsh W., Hattie J. The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education 2002, 73(5):24-35.
28. Mcafee A. Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review 2006, 47(3):21-28.
29. Metters R., Walton S. Strategic supply chain choices for multi-channel Internet retailers. Service Business 2007, 1(4):317-331.
30. Mueller D., Strohmeier S. Design characteristics of virtual learning environments: an expert study. International Journal of Training and Development 2010, 14(3):209-222.
31. O'reilly T. What is web 2.0 Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications and Strategies 2005, (1):17.
32. Oliver M., Trigwell K. Can blended learning be redeemed?. E-learning 2005, 2(1):17-26.
33. Piskurich G.M. On line learning: e-learning. Fast, cheap and good. Performance Improvement 2006, 45(1):18-24.
34. Reddy M., Jansen B. A model for understanding collaborative information behaviour in context: a study of two healthcare systems. Processing and Management 2008, 44:256-273.
35. Resta P. Information and Communication Technologies for Teaching: A Guide for Planning 2004, UNESCO, France.
36. Ryan S., Scott B., Freeman H., Patel D. The Virtual University: The Internet and Resource-based Learning 2000, Kogan Page, London.
37. Schultze U., Stabell Ch. Knowing what you don't know? Discourses and contradictions in knowledge management research. Journal of Management Studies 2004, 41(1):549-573.
38. Urdan T., Weggen C. Corporate E-Learning: Exploring a New Frontier 2000, Hambrecht & Co.
39. Van Raaij E.M., Schepers J.L. The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers in Education 2008, 50(3):838-852.
40. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000, 46(2):186-224.
41. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003, 27(3):425-478.
42. Weinberger D. Everything is Miscellaneous. The Power of the New Digital Disorder 2007, Times Books, New York.
43. Wiley D. The Instructional Use of Learning OBJECTS 2002, Agency for Instructional Technology, Bloomington.
44. Yuen A., Ma W. Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 2008, 36(3):229-243.