Framing, decision-aid systems, and culture: Exploring influences on fraud investigations

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 316-333

  Huerta, Esperanza ^a   Glandon, TerryAnn ^a   Petrides, Yanira ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO AUTÓNOMO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Cognitive bias; Culture; Decision aid; Framing; Fraud prevention software

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868300112     PISSN: 14670895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2012.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ACFE 2010 Report to the nations on occupational fraud & abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners 2010 [cited July 20th 2011]. Available from. http://www.acfe.com/rttn-2010.pdf.
2. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior 1980, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Arnold V., Collier P.A., Leech S.A., Sutton S.G. Impact of intelligent decision aids on expert and novice decision-makers' judgments. Acc Finance 2004, 44(1):1-26.
4. Arnold V., Clark N., Collier P.A., Leech S.A., Sutton S.G. An investigation of knowledge-based systems' use to promote judgment consistency in multicultural firm environments. J Emerg Technol Acc 2005, 2:33-59.
5. Bhandari G., Hassanein K., Deaves R. Debiasing investors with decision support systems: an experimental investigation. Decis Support Syst 2008, 46(1):399-410.
6. Biehl M. Success factors for implementing global information systems. Commun ACM 2007, 50(1):53-58.
7. Brown D.L., Jones D.R. Factors that influence reliance on decision aids: a model and an experiment. J Inf Syst 1998, 12(2):75-94.
8. Brumagim A.L., Wu X. An examination of cross-cultural differences in attitudes towards risk: testing prospect theory in the People's Republic of China. Multinat Bus Rev 2005, 13(3):67-86.
9. Cheng F.-F., Wu C.-S. Debiasing the framing effect: the effect of warning and involvement. Decis Support Syst 2010, 49(3):328-334.
10. Gamst G., Meyers L.S., Guarino A.J. Analysis of variance designs 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Hampton C. Determinants of reliance: an empirical test of the theory of technology dominance. Int J Account Inf Syst 2005, 6(4):217-240.
12. Hens T., Wang M. Does finance have a cultural dimension? (No. 377). National Centre of Competence in Research Financial Valuation and Risk Management 2007 [cited July 20th 2011]. Available from. http://www.nccr-finrisk.uzh.ch/media/pdf/wp/WP377_A1.pdf.
13. Hofstede G.H. Culture's consequences, international differences in work-related values 1980, Sage, Beverly Hills.
14. Hofstede G.H. Organizations and culture: software of the mind 1997, McGraw-Hill, New York.
15. Hogarth R.M. A perspective on cognitive research in accounting. Account Rev 1991, 66(2):277-290.
16. Hogarth R.M. Accounting for decisions and decisions for accounting. Account Organ Soc 1993, 18(5):407-424.
17. Holton C. Identifying disgruntled employee systems fraud risk through text mining: a simple solution for a multi-billion dollar problem. Decis Support Syst 2009, 46(4):853-864.
18. Culture, leadership, and organizations: the GLOBE study of 62 societies 2004, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. R.J. House, P.J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P.W. Dorfman, V. Gupta (Eds.).
19. Hughes P.A., Slepian J.L., Radosevich D.J. Reframing the framing effect: on the role of professional learning and decision frames in management decision-making. Int J Bus Res 2010, 10(6):156-165.
20. Hunter P. Email meets Enron to bring lawyers down on big corporations. Comput Fraud Secur 2007, (5):18-20.
21. Igou E.R., Bless H. On undesirable consequences of thinking: framing effects as a function of substantive processing. J Behav Decis Mak 2007, 20(2):125-142.
22. Jensen M.L., Lowry P.B., Burgoon J.K., Nunamaker J.F.J. Technology dominance in complex decision making: the case of aided credibility assessment. J Manag Inf Syst 2010, 27(1):175-201.
23. Kerlinger F.N., Lee H.B. Foundations of behavioral research 2000, Harcourt College Publishers, Fort Worth. 4th ed.
24. Kirkman B., Lowe K.B., Gibson C.B. A quarter century of culture's consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. J Int Bus Stud 2006, 37(2):285-320.
25. Lee J.D., See K.A. Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum Factors 2004, 46(1):50-80.
26. Levin I.P., Schneider S.L., Gaeth G.J. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1998, 76(2):149-188.
27. Li X., Hess T.J., Valacich J.S. Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems. J Strateg Inf Syst 2008, 17(1):39-71.
28. Marshall R., Huan T.-C., Xu Y., Nam I. Extending prospect theory cross-culturally by examining switching behavior in consumer and business-to-business contexts. J Bus Res 2011, 64(8):871-878.
29. McCoy S., Galletta D.F., King W.R. Integrating national culture into IS research: the need for current individual-level measures. Commun AIS 2005, (15):211-224.
30. Nunnally J.C., Bernstein I.H. Psychometric theory 1994, McGraw-Hill, New York. 3rd ed.
31. O'Donnell E., David J.S. How information systems influence user decisions: a research framework and literature review. Int J Account Inf Syst 2000, 1(3):178-203.
32. Pemble M. Email & web abuse - monitoring and investigations: the preliminaries. Comput Fraud Secur 2003, (7):6-9.
33. Pemble M. Email and web abuse - monitoring & investigations: part II: web monitoring. Comput Fraud Secur 2003, (8):5-9.
34. Perrin B.M., Barnett B.J., Walrath L., Grossman J.D. Information order and outcome framing: an assessment of judgment bias in a naturalistic decision-making context. Hum Factors 2001, 43(2):227-238.
35. Rose J.M. Behavioral decision aid research: decision aid use and effects. Researching accounting as an information systems discipline 2002, 111-133. American Accounting Association. V. Arnold, S.G. Sutton (Eds.).
36. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology 1992, 1-65. Academic Press. P.Z. Mark (Ed.).
37. Schwartz S.H. Beyond individualism/collectivism: new cultural dimensions of values. Individualism and collectivism: theory, method, and applications 1994, 85-119. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, G. Yoon (Eds.).
38. Schwartz S.H. A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. European Social Survey Core Questionnaire Development 2002, 259-319. E.S. Survey (Ed.).
39. Sivakumar K., Nakata C. The stampede toward Hofstede's framework: avoiding the sample design pit in cross-cultural research. J Int Bus Stud 2001, 32(3):555.
40. Todd P., Benbasat I. The impact of information technology on decision making: a cognitive perspective. Framing the domains of IT management 2000, 1-14. Pinnaflex Education Resources, Cincinnati, Ohio. R.W. Zmud (Ed.).
41. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211(4481):453-458.